技术革新是否使使用人类受试者进行致敏提取物效力评估变得不道德

Jason Behrmann
{"title":"技术革新是否使使用人类受试者进行致敏提取物效力评估变得不道德","authors":"Jason Behrmann","doi":"10.1177/2150129711408306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990s, production batch consistency and the standardization of potency units of allergenic extracts used in allergen immunotherapy has been the focus of drug regulatory reforms and much academic debate. This article seeks to expand the current debate by identifying ethical arguments in support of regulatory reforms to eliminate the use of human subjects for potency assessments of these therapeutics. Although human subject testing is the best method to assess biological potency, it also exposes subjects to significant risks, risks that ought to be avoided as much as possible. Innovation in in vitro immunoassays will soon provide feasible alternatives to biological assessments. This article argues that the allergology community must now consider eliminating human subjects in standardization and potency assessment methods as an ethical imperative in regulatory reforms. Moreover, the allergology community will soon need to reach consensus regarding when in vitro tests are “good enough” in replicatin...","PeriodicalId":15244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators","volume":"129 1","pages":"272-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Have Technological Innovations Made Unethical the Use of Human Subjects for Potency Assessments of Allergenic Extracts\",\"authors\":\"Jason Behrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2150129711408306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1990s, production batch consistency and the standardization of potency units of allergenic extracts used in allergen immunotherapy has been the focus of drug regulatory reforms and much academic debate. This article seeks to expand the current debate by identifying ethical arguments in support of regulatory reforms to eliminate the use of human subjects for potency assessments of these therapeutics. Although human subject testing is the best method to assess biological potency, it also exposes subjects to significant risks, risks that ought to be avoided as much as possible. Innovation in in vitro immunoassays will soon provide feasible alternatives to biological assessments. This article argues that the allergology community must now consider eliminating human subjects in standardization and potency assessment methods as an ethical imperative in regulatory reforms. Moreover, the allergology community will soon need to reach consensus regarding when in vitro tests are “good enough” in replicatin...\",\"PeriodicalId\":15244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"272-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2150129711408306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma & Allergy Educators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2150129711408306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自20世纪90年代以来,用于过敏原免疫治疗的致敏提取物的生产批次一致性和效价单位的标准化一直是药物监管改革和许多学术争论的焦点。本文旨在通过确定支持监管改革的伦理论据来扩大当前的争论,以消除使用人类受试者进行这些治疗药物的效力评估。虽然人体试验是评估生物效力的最佳方法,但它也使试验对象面临重大风险,这些风险应该尽可能避免。体外免疫测定的创新将很快为生物评估提供可行的替代方案。本文认为,过敏症界现在必须考虑在标准化和效力评估方法中消除人类受试者,作为监管改革的道德要求。此外,过敏症学界很快就需要就体外试验何时在复制方面“足够好”达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Have Technological Innovations Made Unethical the Use of Human Subjects for Potency Assessments of Allergenic Extracts
Since the 1990s, production batch consistency and the standardization of potency units of allergenic extracts used in allergen immunotherapy has been the focus of drug regulatory reforms and much academic debate. This article seeks to expand the current debate by identifying ethical arguments in support of regulatory reforms to eliminate the use of human subjects for potency assessments of these therapeutics. Although human subject testing is the best method to assess biological potency, it also exposes subjects to significant risks, risks that ought to be avoided as much as possible. Innovation in in vitro immunoassays will soon provide feasible alternatives to biological assessments. This article argues that the allergology community must now consider eliminating human subjects in standardization and potency assessment methods as an ethical imperative in regulatory reforms. Moreover, the allergology community will soon need to reach consensus regarding when in vitro tests are “good enough” in replicatin...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信