论证中的解耦:图尔明的直观循环

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
C. Santibáñez
{"title":"论证中的解耦:图尔明的直观循环","authors":"C. Santibáñez","doi":"10.32735/s0718-2201201900049752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I propose to understand argumentative decoupling, that is, the structural fact of presenting something as data in one argument and then the same information as a conclusion in another argument, as the decoupling of representations. To achieve this approach, I discuss perspectives from cognitive and evolutionary theories that describe this phenomenon in intentional communication in other species, as well as in human infants. I conclude by discussing the relationship between this human cognitive capacity and the problem of reflexivity.","PeriodicalId":43217,"journal":{"name":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","volume":"38 1","pages":"225-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desacoplamiento en la argumentación: El bucle intuitivo de Toulmin\",\"authors\":\"C. Santibáñez\",\"doi\":\"10.32735/s0718-2201201900049752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I propose to understand argumentative decoupling, that is, the structural fact of presenting something as data in one argument and then the same information as a conclusion in another argument, as the decoupling of representations. To achieve this approach, I discuss perspectives from cognitive and evolutionary theories that describe this phenomenon in intentional communication in other species, as well as in human infants. I conclude by discussing the relationship between this human cognitive capacity and the problem of reflexivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"225-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201201900049752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-2201201900049752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我建议理解论证解耦,即在一个论证中作为数据呈现某些东西,然后在另一个论证中作为结论呈现相同信息的结构事实,作为表征的解耦。为了实现这一方法,我讨论了认知和进化理论的观点,这些理论描述了其他物种以及人类婴儿有意交流中的这种现象。最后,我将讨论这种人类认知能力与反身性问题之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Desacoplamiento en la argumentación: El bucle intuitivo de Toulmin
In this paper, I propose to understand argumentative decoupling, that is, the structural fact of presenting something as data in one argument and then the same information as a conclusion in another argument, as the decoupling of representations. To achieve this approach, I discuss perspectives from cognitive and evolutionary theories that describe this phenomenon in intentional communication in other species, as well as in human infants. I conclude by discussing the relationship between this human cognitive capacity and the problem of reflexivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia
Alpha-Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信