在改用多替格拉韦加拉米夫定与继续三联治疗后,病毒学抑制的hiv感染患者的炎症标志物:在现实环境中48周的结果

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
F. Lombardi, S. Belmonti, D. Moschese, M. Fabbiani, A. Borghetti, A. Ciccullo, E. Visconti, S. Di Giambenedetto
{"title":"在改用多替格拉韦加拉米夫定与继续三联治疗后,病毒学抑制的hiv感染患者的炎症标志物:在现实环境中48周的结果","authors":"F. Lombardi, S. Belmonti, D. Moschese, M. Fabbiani, A. Borghetti, A. Ciccullo, E. Visconti, S. Di Giambenedetto","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a treatment switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine on the soluble inflammatory biomarkers of HIV-infected patients treated in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal study that enrolled virologically-suppressed patients on stable 3-drug ART who switched at baseline to dolutegravir + lamivudine (2DR-group), based on the clinician’s decision, or maintained triple therapy (3DR-group). Subjects in the 3DR-group were matched with those in the 2DR-group for age, gender and type of anchor drug. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), I-FABP, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified by a microfluidic ultrasensitive ELISA assay at baseline and at 48 weeks. Results: Overall 208 subjects were enrolled: 101 in the 2DR-group and 107 in the 3DR-group. At baseline, biomarker levels were comparable between groups. The differences in mean log10 change from baseline to 48 weeks between groups (2DR versus 3DR) were: IL-6 (pg/L) −0.051(95% CI −0.115/0.009) versus 0.004 (95% CI −0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159); I-FABP (pg/mL), −0.088 (95% CI −0.14/-0.041) versus 0.033 (95%CI −0.007/0.072) (p < 0.001); D-dimer (pg/mL), −0.011(95% CI-0.055/0.033) versus −0.021 (95% CI −0.071/0.030) (p = 0.780) and CRP (pg/mL), −0.028 (95%CI −0.118/0.063) versus 0.118 (95% CI 0.024/0.211) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: At 1 year, switching to a dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual regimen in this setting showed a favorable trend for two biomarkers analyzed, i.e., I-FABP and CRP, as compared to continuing a triple therapy. These results add important new data in support of the safety of this approach in terms of its effect on the inflammatory milieu.","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"117 1","pages":"28 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inflammation markers in virologically suppressed HIV-Infected patients after switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine vs continuing triple therapy: 48-week results in real-life setting\",\"authors\":\"F. Lombardi, S. Belmonti, D. Moschese, M. Fabbiani, A. Borghetti, A. Ciccullo, E. Visconti, S. Di Giambenedetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a treatment switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine on the soluble inflammatory biomarkers of HIV-infected patients treated in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal study that enrolled virologically-suppressed patients on stable 3-drug ART who switched at baseline to dolutegravir + lamivudine (2DR-group), based on the clinician’s decision, or maintained triple therapy (3DR-group). Subjects in the 3DR-group were matched with those in the 2DR-group for age, gender and type of anchor drug. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), I-FABP, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified by a microfluidic ultrasensitive ELISA assay at baseline and at 48 weeks. Results: Overall 208 subjects were enrolled: 101 in the 2DR-group and 107 in the 3DR-group. At baseline, biomarker levels were comparable between groups. The differences in mean log10 change from baseline to 48 weeks between groups (2DR versus 3DR) were: IL-6 (pg/L) −0.051(95% CI −0.115/0.009) versus 0.004 (95% CI −0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159); I-FABP (pg/mL), −0.088 (95% CI −0.14/-0.041) versus 0.033 (95%CI −0.007/0.072) (p < 0.001); D-dimer (pg/mL), −0.011(95% CI-0.055/0.033) versus −0.021 (95% CI −0.071/0.030) (p = 0.780) and CRP (pg/mL), −0.028 (95%CI −0.118/0.063) versus 0.118 (95% CI 0.024/0.211) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: At 1 year, switching to a dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual regimen in this setting showed a favorable trend for two biomarkers analyzed, i.e., I-FABP and CRP, as compared to continuing a triple therapy. These results add important new data in support of the safety of this approach in terms of its effect on the inflammatory milieu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评估在现实环境中,治疗切换到多替格拉韦加拉米夫定对hiv感染患者可溶性炎症生物标志物的影响。材料和方法:这是一项纵向研究,纳入了病毒学抑制的患者,他们在基线时根据临床医生的决定切换到多替格拉韦+拉米夫定(2dr组),或维持三联治疗(3dr组)。3dr组受试者与2dr组受试者在年龄、性别和锚药类型上进行匹配。在基线和48周时,采用微流体超灵敏ELISA法测定血浆白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、I-FABP、d -二聚体和c -反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果:共入组208例,2dr组101例,3dr组107例。在基线时,两组之间的生物标志物水平具有可比性。两组(2DR vs 3DR)从基线到48周的平均log10变化差异为:IL-6 (pg/L) - 0.051(95% CI - 0.115/0.009) vs . 0.004 (95% CI - 0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159);I-FABP (pg / mL),−0.088 (95% CI−0.14/-0.041)和0.033(95%可信区间−0.007/0.072)(p < 0.001);肺动脉栓塞(pg / mL)−0.011 (95% CI - 0.055/0.033)与−0.021 (95% CI−0.071/0.030)(p = 0.780)和c反应蛋白(pg / mL)−0.028 (95% CI−0.118/0.063)和0.118(95%可信区间0.024/0.211)(p = 0.028)。结论:在1年时,与继续三联治疗相比,在这种情况下切换到多替格拉韦加拉米夫定的双重治疗方案,分析了两种生物标志物,即I-FABP和CRP的有利趋势。这些结果增加了重要的新数据,支持这种方法对炎症环境的影响的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inflammation markers in virologically suppressed HIV-Infected patients after switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine vs continuing triple therapy: 48-week results in real-life setting
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a treatment switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine on the soluble inflammatory biomarkers of HIV-infected patients treated in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal study that enrolled virologically-suppressed patients on stable 3-drug ART who switched at baseline to dolutegravir + lamivudine (2DR-group), based on the clinician’s decision, or maintained triple therapy (3DR-group). Subjects in the 3DR-group were matched with those in the 2DR-group for age, gender and type of anchor drug. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), I-FABP, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified by a microfluidic ultrasensitive ELISA assay at baseline and at 48 weeks. Results: Overall 208 subjects were enrolled: 101 in the 2DR-group and 107 in the 3DR-group. At baseline, biomarker levels were comparable between groups. The differences in mean log10 change from baseline to 48 weeks between groups (2DR versus 3DR) were: IL-6 (pg/L) −0.051(95% CI −0.115/0.009) versus 0.004 (95% CI −0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159); I-FABP (pg/mL), −0.088 (95% CI −0.14/-0.041) versus 0.033 (95%CI −0.007/0.072) (p < 0.001); D-dimer (pg/mL), −0.011(95% CI-0.055/0.033) versus −0.021 (95% CI −0.071/0.030) (p = 0.780) and CRP (pg/mL), −0.028 (95%CI −0.118/0.063) versus 0.118 (95% CI 0.024/0.211) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: At 1 year, switching to a dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual regimen in this setting showed a favorable trend for two biomarkers analyzed, i.e., I-FABP and CRP, as compared to continuing a triple therapy. These results add important new data in support of the safety of this approach in terms of its effect on the inflammatory milieu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信