两种粘合剂在捕虫器中捕虫的效果

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences

New Zealand Plant Protection Pub Date : 2019-07-27 DOI:10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.301

P. Lo, R. Wallis, D. Bellamy

{"title":"两种粘合剂在捕虫器中捕虫的效果","authors":"P. Lo, R. Wallis, D. Bellamy","doi":"10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sticky traps for monitoring insects use polybutene adhesive (PBA) to entangle insects. This glue is effective but messy to use and an alternative, hot-melt pressure-sensitive adhesive (HMPSA) is available. The effectiveness of these two adhesives was compared for catching pest and beneficial insects, primarily in apples. Various types of trap with either PBA or HMSPA were placed in orchards and vineyards in Hawke’s Bay and Nelson. Eight pests from six families, six parasitoids, five predators and one pollinator were commonly recorded. Traps with HMPSA generally caught similar numbers or more of both insect pests and beneficial insects than traps with PBA. Traps with HMPSA performed better for larger insects (>1.5 mm), whereas those with PBA tended to be more effective for smaller insects. Both types of adhesive were effective for up to 4 weeks. HMPSA was effective for monitoring a range of insect pests and beneficial insects. Compared with PBA, HMPSA was more consistent and much cleaner and easier to use. It is recommended that HMPSA replaces PBA in traps for monitoring moth pests in the pipfruit industry.","PeriodicalId":19180,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Plant Protection","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of two types of adhesive for catching insects in traps\",\"authors\":\"P. Lo, R. Wallis, D. Bellamy\",\"doi\":\"10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sticky traps for monitoring insects use polybutene adhesive (PBA) to entangle insects. This glue is effective but messy to use and an alternative, hot-melt pressure-sensitive adhesive (HMPSA) is available. The effectiveness of these two adhesives was compared for catching pest and beneficial insects, primarily in apples. Various types of trap with either PBA or HMSPA were placed in orchards and vineyards in Hawke’s Bay and Nelson. Eight pests from six families, six parasitoids, five predators and one pollinator were commonly recorded. Traps with HMPSA generally caught similar numbers or more of both insect pests and beneficial insects than traps with PBA. Traps with HMPSA performed better for larger insects (>1.5 mm), whereas those with PBA tended to be more effective for smaller insects. Both types of adhesive were effective for up to 4 weeks. HMPSA was effective for monitoring a range of insect pests and beneficial insects. Compared with PBA, HMPSA was more consistent and much cleaner and easier to use. It is recommended that HMPSA replaces PBA in traps for monitoring moth pests in the pipfruit industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Plant Protection\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Plant Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30843/NZPP.2019.72.301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

用于监测昆虫的粘捕器使用聚丁烯胶粘剂(PBA)缠绕昆虫。这种胶水很有效，但用起来很乱，还有一种替代品，热熔压敏胶(HMPSA)。比较了两种胶粘剂对苹果害虫和益虫的捕获效果。在霍克湾和纳尔逊的果园和葡萄园中放置了各种带有PBA或HMSPA的诱捕器。常见害虫6科8种，寄生蜂6种，捕食者5种，传粉者1种。与PBA诱捕器相比，HMPSA诱捕器捕获的害虫和有益昆虫的数量通常相似或更多。HMPSA诱捕器对较大的昆虫(>1.5 mm)效果较好，而PBA诱捕器对较小的昆虫更有效。两种胶粘剂的有效时间均达4周。HMPSA对一系列害虫和有益昆虫的监测是有效的。与PBA相比，HMPSA更一致，更清洁，更易于使用。建议用HMPSA代替PBA，在果业中进行害虫监测。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The effectiveness of two types of adhesive for catching insects in traps

Sticky traps for monitoring insects use polybutene adhesive (PBA) to entangle insects. This glue is effective but messy to use and an alternative, hot-melt pressure-sensitive adhesive (HMPSA) is available. The effectiveness of these two adhesives was compared for catching pest and beneficial insects, primarily in apples. Various types of trap with either PBA or HMSPA were placed in orchards and vineyards in Hawke’s Bay and Nelson. Eight pests from six families, six parasitoids, five predators and one pollinator were commonly recorded. Traps with HMPSA generally caught similar numbers or more of both insect pests and beneficial insects than traps with PBA. Traps with HMPSA performed better for larger insects (>1.5 mm), whereas those with PBA tended to be more effective for smaller insects. Both types of adhesive were effective for up to 4 weeks. HMPSA was effective for monitoring a range of insect pests and beneficial insects. Compared with PBA, HMPSA was more consistent and much cleaner and easier to use. It is recommended that HMPSA replaces PBA in traps for monitoring moth pests in the pipfruit industry.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Zealand Plant Protection Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Zealand Plant Protection is the journal of the New Zealand Plant Protection Society. It publishes original research papers on all aspects of biology, ecology and control of weeds, vertebrate and invertebrate pests, and pathogens and beneficial micro-organisms in agriculture, horticulture, forestry and natural ecosystems of relevance to New Zealand.