克尔凯郭尔的“寻找上帝的人”作为一种文化和人类学类型

L. Klyukina
{"title":"克尔凯郭尔的“寻找上帝的人”作为一种文化和人类学类型","authors":"L. Klyukina","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-32-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. This article attempts to present Søren Kierkegaard’s “man in search of God” as  a  cultural  and  anthropological  type  of  a  person  that  shapes  their  self-cognition independently in the dimension of their existence.Methodology and sources. The following sources are referred to in this article: “Fear and Trembling”  and  “The  Gospel  of  Sufferings”  by  Søren  Kierkegaard; works  of  ante-revolutionary and  modern  Russian  authors  L.I.  Shestov,  N.A.  Berdyaev,  B.E.  Bykhovsky, P.P. Gidenko, S.S. Khoruzhy, E.N. Levicheva, V.A. Podoroga, V.D. Gubin, L.A. Klyukina; texts by researchers foreign to Russia, such as U. Hubben, T.V. Schitsova. To research and describe the  experience  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  in  Kierkegaard’s  “movement  of  faith”,  the ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach have been employed.Results and discussion. This article demonstrates that it is not faith but search for faith that is the aim of Kierkegaard’s philosophy and meaning of his existence. This is because only in the “movement of faith” is a person able to actualize their inner self in their outer self, or face their own self that searches for God. For Kierkegaard, the example of this is Jesus Christ. With the help of Christ as symbol, a person is capable of comprehending the soul’s immortality as the metaphysical dimension of a human being.In the context of Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach, the author of this articles shows  that  understanding  Christ  as  the  symbol  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  and  selffulfillment can be interpreted as the experience of distinguishing between the symbols of time  and  infinity  in  consciousness.  This  very  reality  of  distinguishing  between  time  and infinity and having to choose between them is referred to in this article as “dynamic infinity”, which is equivalent to Kierkegaard’s notions of “movement of faith” and “moment”.Conclusion.  The  author  concludes  that  in  post-modern  world,  when  a  typical  person  is experiencing acutely the loss of fundamental autonomous individuality while the erosion of personal origin in culture is leading to dehumanization and disintegration of society, Søren Kierkegaard’s  “man  in  search  of  God”  can  become  a  reference  point  for  developing  an individual thinking and integral personality.","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Søren Kierkegaard’s “Man in Search of God” as a Cultural and Anthropological Type\",\"authors\":\"L. Klyukina\",\"doi\":\"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-32-43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. This article attempts to present Søren Kierkegaard’s “man in search of God” as  a  cultural  and  anthropological  type  of  a  person  that  shapes  their  self-cognition independently in the dimension of their existence.Methodology and sources. The following sources are referred to in this article: “Fear and Trembling”  and  “The  Gospel  of  Sufferings”  by  Søren  Kierkegaard; works  of  ante-revolutionary and  modern  Russian  authors  L.I.  Shestov,  N.A.  Berdyaev,  B.E.  Bykhovsky, P.P. Gidenko, S.S. Khoruzhy, E.N. Levicheva, V.A. Podoroga, V.D. Gubin, L.A. Klyukina; texts by researchers foreign to Russia, such as U. Hubben, T.V. Schitsova. To research and describe the  experience  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  in  Kierkegaard’s  “movement  of  faith”,  the ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach have been employed.Results and discussion. This article demonstrates that it is not faith but search for faith that is the aim of Kierkegaard’s philosophy and meaning of his existence. This is because only in the “movement of faith” is a person able to actualize their inner self in their outer self, or face their own self that searches for God. For Kierkegaard, the example of this is Jesus Christ. With the help of Christ as symbol, a person is capable of comprehending the soul’s immortality as the metaphysical dimension of a human being.In the context of Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach, the author of this articles shows  that  understanding  Christ  as  the  symbol  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  and  selffulfillment can be interpreted as the experience of distinguishing between the symbols of time  and  infinity  in  consciousness.  This  very  reality  of  distinguishing  between  time  and infinity and having to choose between them is referred to in this article as “dynamic infinity”, which is equivalent to Kierkegaard’s notions of “movement of faith” and “moment”.Conclusion.  The  author  concludes  that  in  post-modern  world,  when  a  typical  person  is experiencing acutely the loss of fundamental autonomous individuality while the erosion of personal origin in culture is leading to dehumanization and disintegration of society, Søren Kierkegaard’s  “man  in  search  of  God”  can  become  a  reference  point  for  developing  an individual thinking and integral personality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Discourse\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-32-43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-32-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。本文试图将克尔凯郭尔的“寻找上帝的人”作为一种文化和人类学类型的人,在他们存在的维度中独立塑造他们的自我认知。方法和来源。本文引用了以下资料:索伦·克尔凯郭尔的《恐惧与颤抖》和《苦难的福音》;反革命和现代俄国作家L.I.舍斯托夫、N.A.别尔佳耶夫、B.E.比霍夫斯基、P.P.吉登科、S.S.霍鲁日、E.N.列维切娃、V.A.波多罗加、V.D.古宾、L.A.克柳金娜的作品;俄罗斯国外研究者的文本,如U. Hubben, T.V. Schitsova。为了研究和描述克尔凯郭尔的“信仰运动”中一个人的自我实现体验,M.K. Mamardashvili的现象学方法被采用。结果和讨论。本文论证了克尔凯郭尔哲学的目的和存在的意义不是信仰,而是对信仰的追求。这是因为只有在“信仰的运动”中,一个人才能在外在的自我中实现内心的自我,或者面对寻找上帝的自我。克尔凯郭尔的例子就是耶稣基督。在基督作为象征的帮助下,一个人能够将灵魂的不朽理解为人类的形而上学维度。在Mamardashvili现象学方法的背景下,本文的作者表明,将基督理解为一个人自我实现和自我实现的象征,可以解释为在意识中区分时间和无限的象征的经验。这种区分时间和无限并不得不在它们之间做出选择的现实在本文中被称为“动态无限”,这相当于克尔凯郭尔的“信仰的运动”和“时刻”的概念。作者认为,在后现代世界中,当一个典型的人正经历着根本的自主个性的急剧丧失,而文化对个人本源的侵蚀正在导致社会的非人化和解体时,克尔凯郭尔的“人在寻找上帝”可以成为发展个体思维和整体人格的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Søren Kierkegaard’s “Man in Search of God” as a Cultural and Anthropological Type
Introduction. This article attempts to present Søren Kierkegaard’s “man in search of God” as  a  cultural  and  anthropological  type  of  a  person  that  shapes  their  self-cognition independently in the dimension of their existence.Methodology and sources. The following sources are referred to in this article: “Fear and Trembling”  and  “The  Gospel  of  Sufferings”  by  Søren  Kierkegaard; works  of  ante-revolutionary and  modern  Russian  authors  L.I.  Shestov,  N.A.  Berdyaev,  B.E.  Bykhovsky, P.P. Gidenko, S.S. Khoruzhy, E.N. Levicheva, V.A. Podoroga, V.D. Gubin, L.A. Klyukina; texts by researchers foreign to Russia, such as U. Hubben, T.V. Schitsova. To research and describe the  experience  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  in  Kierkegaard’s  “movement  of  faith”,  the ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach have been employed.Results and discussion. This article demonstrates that it is not faith but search for faith that is the aim of Kierkegaard’s philosophy and meaning of his existence. This is because only in the “movement of faith” is a person able to actualize their inner self in their outer self, or face their own self that searches for God. For Kierkegaard, the example of this is Jesus Christ. With the help of Christ as symbol, a person is capable of comprehending the soul’s immortality as the metaphysical dimension of a human being.In the context of Mamardashvili’s phenomenological approach, the author of this articles shows  that  understanding  Christ  as  the  symbol  of  a  person’s  self-actualization  and  selffulfillment can be interpreted as the experience of distinguishing between the symbols of time  and  infinity  in  consciousness.  This  very  reality  of  distinguishing  between  time  and infinity and having to choose between them is referred to in this article as “dynamic infinity”, which is equivalent to Kierkegaard’s notions of “movement of faith” and “moment”.Conclusion.  The  author  concludes  that  in  post-modern  world,  when  a  typical  person  is experiencing acutely the loss of fundamental autonomous individuality while the erosion of personal origin in culture is leading to dehumanization and disintegration of society, Søren Kierkegaard’s  “man  in  search  of  God”  can  become  a  reference  point  for  developing  an individual thinking and integral personality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信