Jessie Hutchison Curtis, Qianqian Zhang‐Wu, Chris K. Chang‐Bacon
{"title":"特刊简介","authors":"Jessie Hutchison Curtis, Qianqian Zhang‐Wu, Chris K. Chang‐Bacon","doi":"10.1080/15348458.2023.2202582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to this special issue, which centers on critical language awareness (CLA) as a framework for working with multilingual students in U.S. schools. The seminal idea for the issue arose from a colloquium, Language Aware Teaching in Multilingual and Remote Contexts, organized by TESOL’s Research Professional Council and held during the 2021 TESOL Convention. By 2021, the educational community was reeling from the effects of COVID-19 and the inescapable evidence that the pandemic had exacerbated already-existing educational inequities globally. These were especially seen in lower-income urban and rural school districts—social geographies that tend to overlap with racialized and linguistically marginalized communities. In the U.S., the disproportionate impact on schools in these communities was widely reported. With educational equity both an ongoing and urgent concern, the research colloquium highlighted instructional approaches that center multilingual students’ linguistic and cultural knowledge in school curricula through critical and liberatory teaching that seeks social change. This issue unpacks the ideological, pedagogical, and practical complexities, as well as the possibilities reported by teacher educators, preand in-service teachers, and students as they engaged these approaches in their multilingual classrooms. Instructional approaches committed to leveraging community languages, language practices, and knowledge in school curricula have gained traction in teacher education programs over the past three decades. Among these approaches, funds of knowledge research (Moll et al., 1992); linguistically and culturally sustaining pedagogies (Paris & Alim, 2017); linguistic landscape research (Shohamy & Gorter, 2009); youth participatory action research (Cammarota & Fine, 2008); and translanguaging (García et al., 2017) are represented in this issue. Yet those involved in the work of education have reported tensions between these approaches and established ideologies and practices in school settings. In the U.S., where English monolingualism rather than bilingualism has been predominantly promoted as an educational goal, there is a need to recognize and affirm the multilingual nature of schools as the worldwide norm (García, 2016), and to support and de-isolate teachers as they take up instructional approaches that value diverse forms of community knowledge. The articles in this issue demonstrate how CLA offers such an avenue. By illustrating how centering students’ languages, language practices, and knowledge unearths ideological and structural challenges, these CLAfocused articles offer possibilities for how teachers and students can be empowered by alternative pedagogies that engage their own decision-making along the way.","PeriodicalId":46978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","volume":"120-121 1","pages":"301 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the Special Issue\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Hutchison Curtis, Qianqian Zhang‐Wu, Chris K. Chang‐Bacon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15348458.2023.2202582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to this special issue, which centers on critical language awareness (CLA) as a framework for working with multilingual students in U.S. schools. The seminal idea for the issue arose from a colloquium, Language Aware Teaching in Multilingual and Remote Contexts, organized by TESOL’s Research Professional Council and held during the 2021 TESOL Convention. By 2021, the educational community was reeling from the effects of COVID-19 and the inescapable evidence that the pandemic had exacerbated already-existing educational inequities globally. These were especially seen in lower-income urban and rural school districts—social geographies that tend to overlap with racialized and linguistically marginalized communities. In the U.S., the disproportionate impact on schools in these communities was widely reported. With educational equity both an ongoing and urgent concern, the research colloquium highlighted instructional approaches that center multilingual students’ linguistic and cultural knowledge in school curricula through critical and liberatory teaching that seeks social change. This issue unpacks the ideological, pedagogical, and practical complexities, as well as the possibilities reported by teacher educators, preand in-service teachers, and students as they engaged these approaches in their multilingual classrooms. Instructional approaches committed to leveraging community languages, language practices, and knowledge in school curricula have gained traction in teacher education programs over the past three decades. Among these approaches, funds of knowledge research (Moll et al., 1992); linguistically and culturally sustaining pedagogies (Paris & Alim, 2017); linguistic landscape research (Shohamy & Gorter, 2009); youth participatory action research (Cammarota & Fine, 2008); and translanguaging (García et al., 2017) are represented in this issue. Yet those involved in the work of education have reported tensions between these approaches and established ideologies and practices in school settings. In the U.S., where English monolingualism rather than bilingualism has been predominantly promoted as an educational goal, there is a need to recognize and affirm the multilingual nature of schools as the worldwide norm (García, 2016), and to support and de-isolate teachers as they take up instructional approaches that value diverse forms of community knowledge. The articles in this issue demonstrate how CLA offers such an avenue. By illustrating how centering students’ languages, language practices, and knowledge unearths ideological and structural challenges, these CLAfocused articles offer possibilities for how teachers and students can be empowered by alternative pedagogies that engage their own decision-making along the way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Identity and Education\",\"volume\":\"120-121 1\",\"pages\":\"301 - 307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Identity and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2202582\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Identity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2202582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
欢迎阅读本期特刊,本期特刊的重点是将批判性语言意识(CLA)作为与美国学校多语种学生合作的框架。这一问题的开创性想法来自于由TESOL研究专业委员会组织并在2021年TESOL大会期间举行的“多语言和远程环境中的语言意识教学”研讨会。到2021年,教育界受到COVID-19的影响,并且有无可辩驳的证据表明,大流行加剧了全球本已存在的教育不平等。这种情况在低收入的城市和农村学区尤其明显,这些地区往往与种族化和语言边缘化的社区重叠。在美国,这些社区对学校不成比例的影响被广泛报道。由于教育公平是一个持续和紧迫的问题,研究讨论会强调了通过寻求社会变革的批判性和解放性教学,将多语种学生的语言和文化知识集中在学校课程中的教学方法。本期报告揭示了意识形态、教学和实践的复杂性,以及教师教育者、在职教师和学生在多语言课堂中使用这些方法时所报告的可能性。在过去的三十年里,致力于在学校课程中利用社区语言、语言实践和知识的教学方法在教师教育项目中获得了牵引力。在这些方法中,知识研究基金(Moll等,1992);在语言和文化上维持教学法(Paris & Alim, 2017);语言景观研究(Shohamy & Gorter, 2009);青年参与行动研究(Cammarota & Fine, 2008);和译语言(García et al., 2017)在本期中有代表。然而,那些参与教育工作的人报告说,这些方法与学校环境中既定的意识形态和实践之间存在紧张关系。在美国,英语单语而不是双语作为教育目标被大力提倡,因此有必要承认和肯定学校的多语性质是全球规范(García, 2016),并在教师采取重视多种形式的社区知识的教学方法时给予支持和消除孤立。本期的文章演示了CLA是如何提供这种途径的。通过说明以学生的语言、语言实践和知识为中心是如何发现意识形态和结构上的挑战的,这些以语言为中心的文章为教师和学生提供了一种可能性,即如何通过参与他们自己的决策的替代教学法来增强他们的能力。
Welcome to this special issue, which centers on critical language awareness (CLA) as a framework for working with multilingual students in U.S. schools. The seminal idea for the issue arose from a colloquium, Language Aware Teaching in Multilingual and Remote Contexts, organized by TESOL’s Research Professional Council and held during the 2021 TESOL Convention. By 2021, the educational community was reeling from the effects of COVID-19 and the inescapable evidence that the pandemic had exacerbated already-existing educational inequities globally. These were especially seen in lower-income urban and rural school districts—social geographies that tend to overlap with racialized and linguistically marginalized communities. In the U.S., the disproportionate impact on schools in these communities was widely reported. With educational equity both an ongoing and urgent concern, the research colloquium highlighted instructional approaches that center multilingual students’ linguistic and cultural knowledge in school curricula through critical and liberatory teaching that seeks social change. This issue unpacks the ideological, pedagogical, and practical complexities, as well as the possibilities reported by teacher educators, preand in-service teachers, and students as they engaged these approaches in their multilingual classrooms. Instructional approaches committed to leveraging community languages, language practices, and knowledge in school curricula have gained traction in teacher education programs over the past three decades. Among these approaches, funds of knowledge research (Moll et al., 1992); linguistically and culturally sustaining pedagogies (Paris & Alim, 2017); linguistic landscape research (Shohamy & Gorter, 2009); youth participatory action research (Cammarota & Fine, 2008); and translanguaging (García et al., 2017) are represented in this issue. Yet those involved in the work of education have reported tensions between these approaches and established ideologies and practices in school settings. In the U.S., where English monolingualism rather than bilingualism has been predominantly promoted as an educational goal, there is a need to recognize and affirm the multilingual nature of schools as the worldwide norm (García, 2016), and to support and de-isolate teachers as they take up instructional approaches that value diverse forms of community knowledge. The articles in this issue demonstrate how CLA offers such an avenue. By illustrating how centering students’ languages, language practices, and knowledge unearths ideological and structural challenges, these CLAfocused articles offer possibilities for how teachers and students can be empowered by alternative pedagogies that engage their own decision-making along the way.