性别、意识形态与概念隐喻:女性与狩猎的源域

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
María D. López Maestre
{"title":"性别、意识形态与概念隐喻:女性与狩猎的源域","authors":"María D. López Maestre","doi":"10.5209/cjes.68355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration.  ","PeriodicalId":40655,"journal":{"name":"Complutense Journal of English Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt\",\"authors\":\"María D. López Maestre\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/cjes.68355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":40655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complutense Journal of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complutense Journal of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.68355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complutense Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.68355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

隐喻推理作为一种认知过程,是不可避免的,但并不一定是无辜的或中立的。众所周知,在认知语言学中,爱和性的概念领域受到了极大的关注。然而,从性别意识形态的角度来看,一个值得进一步探索的来源领域是狩猎。出于这个原因,本文采用认知语言学与批判性话语分析相结合的方法,通过狩猎隐喻来研究爱情、诱惑和寻找伴侣/丈夫的概念化,重点关注女性和狩猎的话语表现。在所研究的文本中,爱情/诱惑/寻找伴侣或丈夫是一场狩猎的概念隐喻是通过诸如hunt, chase, pursuit, catch, capture, trap等隐喻性语言表达来激活的。在意识形态方面,隐喻是民间信仰和男性气质主导观念的有力传递者。研究发现,显示男性为特权性别的性别价值观,以及支持男性主导和女性顺从的性别歧视意识形态,构成了研究中的文本的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt
As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complutense Journal of English Studies
Complutense Journal of English Studies LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信