发射线和接收线间距对地震数据质量影响的评价——维兹比卡三维AGH地震实验

IF 0.4 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Barmuta, Monika Korbecka, Piotr Hadro, Krzysztof Pieniądz, M. Stefaniuk, K. Dzwinel, A. Buniak
{"title":"发射线和接收线间距对地震数据质量影响的评价——维兹比卡三维AGH地震实验","authors":"J. Barmuta, Monika Korbecka, Piotr Hadro, Krzysztof Pieniądz, M. Stefaniuk, K. Dzwinel, A. Buniak","doi":"10.7494/geol.2020.46.2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attempt was made to describe the quality of the stacked seismic data semi-quantitatively with respect to the spacing of shot and receiver lines. The methods used included: signal-to-noise ratio calculation, seismic-to-well tie accuracy, wavelet extraction effectiveness and reliability of semi-automated interpretation of seismic attributes. This study was focused on the Ordovician-Silurian interval of the Lublin Basin, Poland, as it was considered as a main target for the exploration of unconventional hydrocarbon deposits. Our results reconfirm the obvious dependency between the density of the acquisition parameters and data quality. However, we also discovered that the seismic data quality is less affected by the shot line spacing than by comparable receiver line spacing. We attributed this issue to the fact of the higher irregularity of the shot points than receiver points, imposed by the terrain accessibility. We have also proven that the regularity of receiver and shot point distribution is crucial for the reliable interpretation of structural seismic attributes, since these were found to be highly sensitive to the acquisition geometry.","PeriodicalId":12724,"journal":{"name":"Geology, Geophysics and Environment","volume":"78 1","pages":"93-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the impact of shot and receiver lines spacing on seismic data quality – the Wierzbica 3D AGH seismic experiment\",\"authors\":\"J. Barmuta, Monika Korbecka, Piotr Hadro, Krzysztof Pieniądz, M. Stefaniuk, K. Dzwinel, A. Buniak\",\"doi\":\"10.7494/geol.2020.46.2.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An attempt was made to describe the quality of the stacked seismic data semi-quantitatively with respect to the spacing of shot and receiver lines. The methods used included: signal-to-noise ratio calculation, seismic-to-well tie accuracy, wavelet extraction effectiveness and reliability of semi-automated interpretation of seismic attributes. This study was focused on the Ordovician-Silurian interval of the Lublin Basin, Poland, as it was considered as a main target for the exploration of unconventional hydrocarbon deposits. Our results reconfirm the obvious dependency between the density of the acquisition parameters and data quality. However, we also discovered that the seismic data quality is less affected by the shot line spacing than by comparable receiver line spacing. We attributed this issue to the fact of the higher irregularity of the shot points than receiver points, imposed by the terrain accessibility. We have also proven that the regularity of receiver and shot point distribution is crucial for the reliable interpretation of structural seismic attributes, since these were found to be highly sensitive to the acquisition geometry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geology, Geophysics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"93-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geology, Geophysics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2020.46.2.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geology, Geophysics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2020.46.2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尝试用发射线和接收线的间距半定量地描述叠加地震资料的质量。采用的方法包括:信噪比计算、地震井联系精度、小波提取有效性和地震属性半自动解释的可靠性。本次研究的重点是波兰卢布林盆地奥陶系—志留系段,该段被认为是非常规油气勘探的主要目标。我们的结果再次证实了采集参数的密度与数据质量之间的明显依赖关系。然而,我们也发现,与类似的接收线间距相比,发射线间距对地震数据质量的影响较小。我们将这一问题归因于地形可达性造成的击球点比接球点更不规则。我们还证明,接收器和发射点分布的规律性对于结构地震属性的可靠解释至关重要,因为它们对采集几何形状高度敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of the impact of shot and receiver lines spacing on seismic data quality – the Wierzbica 3D AGH seismic experiment
An attempt was made to describe the quality of the stacked seismic data semi-quantitatively with respect to the spacing of shot and receiver lines. The methods used included: signal-to-noise ratio calculation, seismic-to-well tie accuracy, wavelet extraction effectiveness and reliability of semi-automated interpretation of seismic attributes. This study was focused on the Ordovician-Silurian interval of the Lublin Basin, Poland, as it was considered as a main target for the exploration of unconventional hydrocarbon deposits. Our results reconfirm the obvious dependency between the density of the acquisition parameters and data quality. However, we also discovered that the seismic data quality is less affected by the shot line spacing than by comparable receiver line spacing. We attributed this issue to the fact of the higher irregularity of the shot points than receiver points, imposed by the terrain accessibility. We have also proven that the regularity of receiver and shot point distribution is crucial for the reliable interpretation of structural seismic attributes, since these were found to be highly sensitive to the acquisition geometry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信