{"title":"确定Lenke 1型青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的影像学参数与患者报告结果之间的关系","authors":"İlker Arık, N. Büker, R. Şavkın, N. Ök, A. Kıter","doi":"10.31362/patd.1251401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to examine sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters in patients with surgically treated Lenke type-1 AIS and to determine the relationship between radiographic outcomes and body image, self-esteem, disability and anxiety. \nMaterials and methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery and followed up for more than 1 years were eveluated (mean age 14.20±1.63 years) retrospectively. Radiographic analysis of A/P and lateral full spine standing radiographs was carried out with the Surgimap software. The patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Correlations between deformity measures and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the Pearson’s correlation test. \nResults: There was a significant decrease in Cobb angle, AVT, trunk shift, T1 tilt and pelvic incidence at early postoperative and final follow up compared with the preoperative measurement (p0.05). \nConclusion: Patient-reported outcomes are important in terms of evaluating the physical and psychosocial effects of scoliosis-related deformity from the patient's perspective. However, low or no correlation was found between radiographic evaluation and patient-reported outcomes. This result indicates that objective and patient-reported results should be interpreted separately.","PeriodicalId":19789,"journal":{"name":"Pamukkale Medical Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the relationship between radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes in Lenke type-1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis\",\"authors\":\"İlker Arık, N. Büker, R. Şavkın, N. Ök, A. Kıter\",\"doi\":\"10.31362/patd.1251401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aims to examine sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters in patients with surgically treated Lenke type-1 AIS and to determine the relationship between radiographic outcomes and body image, self-esteem, disability and anxiety. \\nMaterials and methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery and followed up for more than 1 years were eveluated (mean age 14.20±1.63 years) retrospectively. Radiographic analysis of A/P and lateral full spine standing radiographs was carried out with the Surgimap software. The patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Correlations between deformity measures and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the Pearson’s correlation test. \\nResults: There was a significant decrease in Cobb angle, AVT, trunk shift, T1 tilt and pelvic incidence at early postoperative and final follow up compared with the preoperative measurement (p0.05). \\nConclusion: Patient-reported outcomes are important in terms of evaluating the physical and psychosocial effects of scoliosis-related deformity from the patient's perspective. However, low or no correlation was found between radiographic evaluation and patient-reported outcomes. This result indicates that objective and patient-reported results should be interpreted separately.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pamukkale Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pamukkale Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1251401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pamukkale Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1251401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of the relationship between radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes in Lenke type-1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Purpose: This study aims to examine sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters in patients with surgically treated Lenke type-1 AIS and to determine the relationship between radiographic outcomes and body image, self-esteem, disability and anxiety.
Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery and followed up for more than 1 years were eveluated (mean age 14.20±1.63 years) retrospectively. Radiographic analysis of A/P and lateral full spine standing radiographs was carried out with the Surgimap software. The patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Correlations between deformity measures and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the Pearson’s correlation test.
Results: There was a significant decrease in Cobb angle, AVT, trunk shift, T1 tilt and pelvic incidence at early postoperative and final follow up compared with the preoperative measurement (p0.05).
Conclusion: Patient-reported outcomes are important in terms of evaluating the physical and psychosocial effects of scoliosis-related deformity from the patient's perspective. However, low or no correlation was found between radiographic evaluation and patient-reported outcomes. This result indicates that objective and patient-reported results should be interpreted separately.