Lonnie Turpin, Jr., K. Bruchhaus, Keith R. Credo, Gerard Ornas, Jr.
{"title":"相对熵和无嫉妒分配","authors":"Lonnie Turpin, Jr., K. Bruchhaus, Keith R. Credo, Gerard Ornas, Jr.","doi":"10.3934/jdg.2022013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this brief work, we study a basic environment consisting of a single receiver taking actions based on information (called signals) from multiple senders. The receiver is a rational Bayesian who uses optimization as a mechanism to convert the signals to actions. The conversions are gambles as the actions must be taken before signal reception. Formal comparisons of differences between the solution sets of both prior and posterior optimization frameworks and their respective probability distributions are given. The difference in probability distributions (denoted by relative entropy) presents a useful tool for modifying the receiver's level of risk. We then construct a simple scenario where the receiver acts as a proxy in a Shapely-Shubik-style game with two agents focusing on different objectives under a common risk level. Acting on their behalf, an envy-free allocation mechanism is presented to simultaneously satisfy each using the asymmetric assignment model when findings show the objectives require identical actions.","PeriodicalId":42722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dynamics and Games","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative entropy and envy-free allocation\",\"authors\":\"Lonnie Turpin, Jr., K. Bruchhaus, Keith R. Credo, Gerard Ornas, Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/jdg.2022013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this brief work, we study a basic environment consisting of a single receiver taking actions based on information (called signals) from multiple senders. The receiver is a rational Bayesian who uses optimization as a mechanism to convert the signals to actions. The conversions are gambles as the actions must be taken before signal reception. Formal comparisons of differences between the solution sets of both prior and posterior optimization frameworks and their respective probability distributions are given. The difference in probability distributions (denoted by relative entropy) presents a useful tool for modifying the receiver's level of risk. We then construct a simple scenario where the receiver acts as a proxy in a Shapely-Shubik-style game with two agents focusing on different objectives under a common risk level. Acting on their behalf, an envy-free allocation mechanism is presented to simultaneously satisfy each using the asymmetric assignment model when findings show the objectives require identical actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dynamics and Games\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dynamics and Games\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/jdg.2022013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dynamics and Games","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/jdg.2022013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this brief work, we study a basic environment consisting of a single receiver taking actions based on information (called signals) from multiple senders. The receiver is a rational Bayesian who uses optimization as a mechanism to convert the signals to actions. The conversions are gambles as the actions must be taken before signal reception. Formal comparisons of differences between the solution sets of both prior and posterior optimization frameworks and their respective probability distributions are given. The difference in probability distributions (denoted by relative entropy) presents a useful tool for modifying the receiver's level of risk. We then construct a simple scenario where the receiver acts as a proxy in a Shapely-Shubik-style game with two agents focusing on different objectives under a common risk level. Acting on their behalf, an envy-free allocation mechanism is presented to simultaneously satisfy each using the asymmetric assignment model when findings show the objectives require identical actions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dynamics and Games (JDG) is a pure and applied mathematical journal that publishes high quality peer-review and expository papers in all research areas of expertise of its editors. The main focus of JDG is in the interface of Dynamical Systems and Game Theory.