基于网络演算的不完全带宽共享策略

A. Bouillard
{"title":"基于网络演算的不完全带宽共享策略","authors":"A. Bouillard","doi":"10.23919/IFIPNetworking57963.2023.10186418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bandwidth-sharing policies aim at enforcing fairness among several classes of traffic by reserving one share of the available bandwidth for each class. They recently attracted a lot of attention, in particular in the context of time-sensitive networking. One advantage of these policies is their simplicity of implementation, especially the Round-Robin policies. Moreover, if a traffic class does not use all its reserved bandwidth, the other classes can use the unused part. Recent works greatly improve the delay bounds by considering this phenomenon for the Deficit Round-Robin policy, when the knowledge about the incoming traffic is available. There was also an attempt to use this approach for Weighted Round-Robin policy. Unfortunately, this was incorrect, mainly due to the variability of the packet lengths and the share of the bandwidth is not perfectly known. In this paper, we propose a generalization of bandwidth-sharing policies, that we call imperfect bandwidth sharing. We compute per-class service guarantees that correct and improves the state of the art on Round-Robin policies, and assess through numerical experiments the algorithmic and performance gain of our solution.","PeriodicalId":31737,"journal":{"name":"Edutech","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imperfect Bandwidth-Sharing Policies using Network Calculus\",\"authors\":\"A. Bouillard\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/IFIPNetworking57963.2023.10186418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bandwidth-sharing policies aim at enforcing fairness among several classes of traffic by reserving one share of the available bandwidth for each class. They recently attracted a lot of attention, in particular in the context of time-sensitive networking. One advantage of these policies is their simplicity of implementation, especially the Round-Robin policies. Moreover, if a traffic class does not use all its reserved bandwidth, the other classes can use the unused part. Recent works greatly improve the delay bounds by considering this phenomenon for the Deficit Round-Robin policy, when the knowledge about the incoming traffic is available. There was also an attempt to use this approach for Weighted Round-Robin policy. Unfortunately, this was incorrect, mainly due to the variability of the packet lengths and the share of the bandwidth is not perfectly known. In this paper, we propose a generalization of bandwidth-sharing policies, that we call imperfect bandwidth sharing. We compute per-class service guarantees that correct and improves the state of the art on Round-Robin policies, and assess through numerical experiments the algorithmic and performance gain of our solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edutech\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edutech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/IFIPNetworking57963.2023.10186418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edutech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/IFIPNetworking57963.2023.10186418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

带宽共享策略旨在通过为每个类别保留一个可用带宽共享来强制几个类别的流量之间的公平性。它们最近引起了很多关注,特别是在时间敏感型网络的背景下。这些策略的一个优点是实现简单,尤其是循环策略。另外,如果一个流量类的预留带宽没有使用完,其他流量类可以使用剩余的部分。最近的研究通过考虑这一现象,极大地改善了赤字轮循策略的延迟边界,当传入流量的信息是可用的。也有人尝试将此方法用于加权轮循策略。不幸的是,这是不正确的,主要是由于数据包长度的可变性和带宽的份额不是完全已知的。在本文中,我们提出了一种广义的带宽共享策略,我们称之为不完全带宽共享。我们计算了每个类的服务保证,正确并改进了轮询策略的最新状态,并通过数值实验评估了我们的解决方案的算法和性能增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imperfect Bandwidth-Sharing Policies using Network Calculus
Bandwidth-sharing policies aim at enforcing fairness among several classes of traffic by reserving one share of the available bandwidth for each class. They recently attracted a lot of attention, in particular in the context of time-sensitive networking. One advantage of these policies is their simplicity of implementation, especially the Round-Robin policies. Moreover, if a traffic class does not use all its reserved bandwidth, the other classes can use the unused part. Recent works greatly improve the delay bounds by considering this phenomenon for the Deficit Round-Robin policy, when the knowledge about the incoming traffic is available. There was also an attempt to use this approach for Weighted Round-Robin policy. Unfortunately, this was incorrect, mainly due to the variability of the packet lengths and the share of the bandwidth is not perfectly known. In this paper, we propose a generalization of bandwidth-sharing policies, that we call imperfect bandwidth sharing. We compute per-class service guarantees that correct and improves the state of the art on Round-Robin policies, and assess through numerical experiments the algorithmic and performance gain of our solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信