氯胺酮-异丙酚(酮酚)与单氯胺酮对经胃肠道内镜手术患者静脉全身麻醉后恢复质量评分(Qor-40)的影响比较

Samawi Husein Ramud, D. W. Wijaya, Yutu Solihat
{"title":"氯胺酮-异丙酚(酮酚)与单氯胺酮对经胃肠道内镜手术患者静脉全身麻醉后恢复质量评分(Qor-40)的影响比较","authors":"Samawi Husein Ramud, D. W. Wijaya, Yutu Solihat","doi":"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures cause discomfort to patients. Administration of sedation to relieve anxiety and discomfort, improve the results of the examination, and reduce the patient's memory of the event. Effective sedation can be judged by how well the drug achieves rapid onset of sedation, hemodynamic stability and fast recovery time. Ketamine maintains hemodynamic stability and sufficient depth of sedation during EGI procedures. Administering ketamine prevents bradycardia, hypotension and achieves sufficient and prolonged sedation.. Objective : This study aims to compare the effect of giving ketamine-propofol (ketofol) with ketamine alone on the recovery quality score of patients after intravenous general anesthesia as measured by QoR-40 in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. Methods : This study is a randomized blinded clinical trial. This research was conducted from July to September 2022. A total of 30 research subjects who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n=15) was given intravenous sedation Ketamine 0.5 mg/KgBW + Propofol 0.5 mg/KgBW, group B (n=15) was given Ketamine 1 mg/KgBW. The patient's recovery score was measured using the QoR-40 questionnaire 60 minutes after the endoscopy procedure was completed. Data were analyzed by univariate and bivariate. Bivariate data were analyzed by Chi-Square test, Independent T-Test and Mann-Whitney.. Results : The assessment of the safety score and the total score in this study found significant differences between the two groups with a p value <0.05. No significant difference was found in the assessment of feelings, support for patients, physical independence and pain scores with a p>0.05. Conclusion : The Ketamine-Propofol group on the comfort score and total score had higher scores than the single ketamine group, whereas on feelings, patient support, physical independence and pain scores there was no difference between the two groups.","PeriodicalId":14290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effect Administration Ketamine-Propofol (Ketofol) With Ketamin Single On The Quality Score Of Recovery In Patients Post Intravenous General Anesthesia As Measured By Qor-40 In Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedure\",\"authors\":\"Samawi Husein Ramud, D. W. Wijaya, Yutu Solihat\",\"doi\":\"10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures cause discomfort to patients. Administration of sedation to relieve anxiety and discomfort, improve the results of the examination, and reduce the patient's memory of the event. Effective sedation can be judged by how well the drug achieves rapid onset of sedation, hemodynamic stability and fast recovery time. Ketamine maintains hemodynamic stability and sufficient depth of sedation during EGI procedures. Administering ketamine prevents bradycardia, hypotension and achieves sufficient and prolonged sedation.. Objective : This study aims to compare the effect of giving ketamine-propofol (ketofol) with ketamine alone on the recovery quality score of patients after intravenous general anesthesia as measured by QoR-40 in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. Methods : This study is a randomized blinded clinical trial. This research was conducted from July to September 2022. A total of 30 research subjects who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n=15) was given intravenous sedation Ketamine 0.5 mg/KgBW + Propofol 0.5 mg/KgBW, group B (n=15) was given Ketamine 1 mg/KgBW. The patient's recovery score was measured using the QoR-40 questionnaire 60 minutes after the endoscopy procedure was completed. Data were analyzed by univariate and bivariate. Bivariate data were analyzed by Chi-Square test, Independent T-Test and Mann-Whitney.. Results : The assessment of the safety score and the total score in this study found significant differences between the two groups with a p value <0.05. No significant difference was found in the assessment of feelings, support for patients, physical independence and pain scores with a p>0.05. Conclusion : The Ketamine-Propofol group on the comfort score and total score had higher scores than the single ketamine group, whereas on feelings, patient support, physical independence and pain scores there was no difference between the two groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.01.2023.p13336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃肠内窥镜检查会给患者带来不适。给予镇静以缓解焦虑和不适,改善检查结果,减少患者对事件的记忆。有效的镇静可通过药物在多大程度上实现快速起效、血流动力学稳定性和快速恢复时间来判断。氯胺酮在EGI过程中维持血流动力学稳定性和足够的镇静深度。给予氯胺酮可预防心动过缓、低血压,并达到充分和持久的镇静作用。目的:比较氯胺酮-异丙酚(酮酚)与单独氯胺酮对胃肠内镜手术患者静脉全身麻醉后恢复质量评分(QoR-40)的影响。方法:采用随机、盲法临床试验。该研究于2022年7月至9月进行。将30例行胃肠内镜检查的研究对象分为两组。A组(n=15)给予氯胺酮0.5 mg/KgBW +异丙酚0.5 mg/KgBW静脉镇静,B组(n=15)给予氯胺酮1 mg/KgBW。在内镜检查完成后60分钟,使用QoR-40问卷测量患者的恢复评分。数据采用单因素和双因素分析。双变量数据采用卡方检验、独立t检验和Mann-Whitney检验。结果:本研究安全性评分及总分评定两组间差异有统计学意义,p值为0.05。结论:氯胺酮-异丙酚组在舒适评分和总分上均高于单氯胺酮组,而在感觉评分、患者支持评分、身体独立性评分和疼痛评分上,两组差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Effect Administration Ketamine-Propofol (Ketofol) With Ketamin Single On The Quality Score Of Recovery In Patients Post Intravenous General Anesthesia As Measured By Qor-40 In Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedure
Introduction: Gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures cause discomfort to patients. Administration of sedation to relieve anxiety and discomfort, improve the results of the examination, and reduce the patient's memory of the event. Effective sedation can be judged by how well the drug achieves rapid onset of sedation, hemodynamic stability and fast recovery time. Ketamine maintains hemodynamic stability and sufficient depth of sedation during EGI procedures. Administering ketamine prevents bradycardia, hypotension and achieves sufficient and prolonged sedation.. Objective : This study aims to compare the effect of giving ketamine-propofol (ketofol) with ketamine alone on the recovery quality score of patients after intravenous general anesthesia as measured by QoR-40 in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. Methods : This study is a randomized blinded clinical trial. This research was conducted from July to September 2022. A total of 30 research subjects who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were divided into 2 groups. Group A (n=15) was given intravenous sedation Ketamine 0.5 mg/KgBW + Propofol 0.5 mg/KgBW, group B (n=15) was given Ketamine 1 mg/KgBW. The patient's recovery score was measured using the QoR-40 questionnaire 60 minutes after the endoscopy procedure was completed. Data were analyzed by univariate and bivariate. Bivariate data were analyzed by Chi-Square test, Independent T-Test and Mann-Whitney.. Results : The assessment of the safety score and the total score in this study found significant differences between the two groups with a p value <0.05. No significant difference was found in the assessment of feelings, support for patients, physical independence and pain scores with a p>0.05. Conclusion : The Ketamine-Propofol group on the comfort score and total score had higher scores than the single ketamine group, whereas on feelings, patient support, physical independence and pain scores there was no difference between the two groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信