“第二受害者”——护士应对用药差错二十年比较(2005-2018)

{"title":"“第二受害者”——护士应对用药差错二十年比较(2005-2018)","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jnh.04.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medication errors may be a critical event for the patients and caregivers involved. The performance of an erring worker, might be detrimental in the private and organizational life. This situation is known as the “secondary victim”. Objectives: To examine the affect of medication errors on the mental state and function of the caregiver who erred: a comparison between findings in 2005 versus its findings in 2018. Design: The research was conducted in the qualitative method. A semi-structured interviews were held with the participants. The data were processed by means of content analysis. Participants: 40 nurses from a general hospital in central Israel who had made an error in the administration of medication. Ethical considerations: The research was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee. Findings: severe emotional consequences commenced immediately after the incident and continued for several days. They were expressed by fear, anxiety, self-blame, shame etc. The participants’ reactions were grouped as: “Taking responsibility”, “Immediate stress response”, “Why did this happen to me”, “Dilemma - whether to tell the patient and his family”, “The staff’s response to the mistake”, “Fear of punishment” versus “In the past there was fear to tell, today there isn’t, anymore”, “The culture of learning and not punishing” and “The emotional impact over time”. Discussion: The ongoing emotional distress that characterized some of the participants was similar to PTSD. The main differences between the findings after more than a decade were the perception of the organization as investigative rather than blameful, which enabled better functioning. Conclusions: workplaces should plan in advance for such events and offer support mechanisms for the “second victim” regardless of the inquiries and examinations held by the risk management unit.","PeriodicalId":89422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","volume":"529 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The “Second Victim” – Nurses’ Coping with Medication Errors Comparison of Two Decades (2005-2018)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jnh.04.04.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Medication errors may be a critical event for the patients and caregivers involved. The performance of an erring worker, might be detrimental in the private and organizational life. This situation is known as the “secondary victim”. Objectives: To examine the affect of medication errors on the mental state and function of the caregiver who erred: a comparison between findings in 2005 versus its findings in 2018. Design: The research was conducted in the qualitative method. A semi-structured interviews were held with the participants. The data were processed by means of content analysis. Participants: 40 nurses from a general hospital in central Israel who had made an error in the administration of medication. Ethical considerations: The research was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee. Findings: severe emotional consequences commenced immediately after the incident and continued for several days. They were expressed by fear, anxiety, self-blame, shame etc. The participants’ reactions were grouped as: “Taking responsibility”, “Immediate stress response”, “Why did this happen to me”, “Dilemma - whether to tell the patient and his family”, “The staff’s response to the mistake”, “Fear of punishment” versus “In the past there was fear to tell, today there isn’t, anymore”, “The culture of learning and not punishing” and “The emotional impact over time”. Discussion: The ongoing emotional distress that characterized some of the participants was similar to PTSD. The main differences between the findings after more than a decade were the perception of the organization as investigative rather than blameful, which enabled better functioning. Conclusions: workplaces should plan in advance for such events and offer support mechanisms for the “second victim” regardless of the inquiries and examinations held by the risk management unit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness\",\"volume\":\"529 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.04.04.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing and healthcare of chronic illness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jnh.04.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:用药错误对患者和相关护理人员来说可能是一个关键事件。一个犯错的员工的表现,可能对个人生活和组织生活都是有害的。这种情况被称为“第二受害者”。目的:探讨用药差错对护理人员精神状态和功能的影响:2005年与2018年研究结果的比较。设计:本研究采用定性方法。与参与者进行了半结构化访谈。采用内容分析法对数据进行处理。参与者:以色列中部一家综合医院的40名护士,他们在给药方面犯了错误。伦理考虑:该研究得到了赫尔辛基机构委员会的批准。结果:严重的情绪后果在事件发生后立即开始并持续数天。它们表现为恐惧、焦虑、自责、羞愧等。参与者的反应分为:“承担责任”、“即时压力反应”、“为什么这件事会发生在我身上”、“进退两难——是否要告诉病人和他的家人”、“工作人员对错误的反应”、“害怕惩罚”与“过去害怕说出来,今天不再害怕了”、“学习和不惩罚的文化”和“随着时间的推移,情绪的影响”。讨论:一些参与者持续的情绪困扰与PTSD相似。十多年后的调查结果之间的主要区别是,人们认为该组织是在调查,而不是在指责,这使得它能够更好地运作。结论:工作场所应提前为此类事件做好计划,并为“第二受害者”提供支持机制,无论风险管理部门是否进行调查和检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The “Second Victim” – Nurses’ Coping with Medication Errors Comparison of Two Decades (2005-2018)
Background: Medication errors may be a critical event for the patients and caregivers involved. The performance of an erring worker, might be detrimental in the private and organizational life. This situation is known as the “secondary victim”. Objectives: To examine the affect of medication errors on the mental state and function of the caregiver who erred: a comparison between findings in 2005 versus its findings in 2018. Design: The research was conducted in the qualitative method. A semi-structured interviews were held with the participants. The data were processed by means of content analysis. Participants: 40 nurses from a general hospital in central Israel who had made an error in the administration of medication. Ethical considerations: The research was approved by the institutional Helsinki committee. Findings: severe emotional consequences commenced immediately after the incident and continued for several days. They were expressed by fear, anxiety, self-blame, shame etc. The participants’ reactions were grouped as: “Taking responsibility”, “Immediate stress response”, “Why did this happen to me”, “Dilemma - whether to tell the patient and his family”, “The staff’s response to the mistake”, “Fear of punishment” versus “In the past there was fear to tell, today there isn’t, anymore”, “The culture of learning and not punishing” and “The emotional impact over time”. Discussion: The ongoing emotional distress that characterized some of the participants was similar to PTSD. The main differences between the findings after more than a decade were the perception of the organization as investigative rather than blameful, which enabled better functioning. Conclusions: workplaces should plan in advance for such events and offer support mechanisms for the “second victim” regardless of the inquiries and examinations held by the risk management unit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信