LIBE委员会关于电子证据的妥协提案的关键要素:从基本权利的角度进行批判性概述

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Athina Sachoulidou
{"title":"LIBE委员会关于电子证据的妥协提案的关键要素:从基本权利的角度进行批判性概述","authors":"Athina Sachoulidou","doi":"10.1080/23340460.2021.1999173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the compromise proposal for a Regulation on cross-border access to electronic information in criminal matters the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs voted in favour of in December 2020. It explores the origins of the e-evidence initiative as a whole by placing it in the context of the EU cooperation on counter-terrorism and digitalization strategy. On this basis, it presents the key elements of the compromise proposal with a focus on the envisaged function of the so-called European Production and Preservation Orders. To contribute to the ongoing debate on the suitability of that proposal compared to the one released by the Commission in April 2018, it argues that the LIBE Committee’s proposal fits better into a Union of Security and Freedom, but further improvements are needed to increase the protection of fundamental rights, given the intrusiveness of the suggested investigative measures.","PeriodicalId":36949,"journal":{"name":"Russia in Global Affairs","volume":"49 1","pages":"777 - 793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The key elements of the LIBE Committee’s compromise proposal on e-evidence: a critical overview through a fundamental rights lens\",\"authors\":\"Athina Sachoulidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23340460.2021.1999173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines the compromise proposal for a Regulation on cross-border access to electronic information in criminal matters the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs voted in favour of in December 2020. It explores the origins of the e-evidence initiative as a whole by placing it in the context of the EU cooperation on counter-terrorism and digitalization strategy. On this basis, it presents the key elements of the compromise proposal with a focus on the envisaged function of the so-called European Production and Preservation Orders. To contribute to the ongoing debate on the suitability of that proposal compared to the one released by the Commission in April 2018, it argues that the LIBE Committee’s proposal fits better into a Union of Security and Freedom, but further improvements are needed to increase the protection of fundamental rights, given the intrusiveness of the suggested investigative measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russia in Global Affairs\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"777 - 793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russia in Global Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1999173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia in Global Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1999173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了欧洲议会公民自由、司法和内政委员会于2020年12月投票赞成的关于刑事事务中跨境获取电子信息的监管妥协提案。它通过将电子证据倡议置于欧盟反恐和数字化战略合作的背景下,探讨了整个电子证据倡议的起源。在此基础上,它提出了折衷建议的关键要素,重点是所谓欧洲生产和保存令设想的功能。为了促进正在进行的关于该提案与委员会2018年4月发布的提案的适用性的辩论,它认为,LIBE委员会的提案更适合安全与自由联盟,但考虑到拟议的调查措施的侵入性,需要进一步改进以增加对基本权利的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The key elements of the LIBE Committee’s compromise proposal on e-evidence: a critical overview through a fundamental rights lens
ABSTRACT This article examines the compromise proposal for a Regulation on cross-border access to electronic information in criminal matters the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs voted in favour of in December 2020. It explores the origins of the e-evidence initiative as a whole by placing it in the context of the EU cooperation on counter-terrorism and digitalization strategy. On this basis, it presents the key elements of the compromise proposal with a focus on the envisaged function of the so-called European Production and Preservation Orders. To contribute to the ongoing debate on the suitability of that proposal compared to the one released by the Commission in April 2018, it argues that the LIBE Committee’s proposal fits better into a Union of Security and Freedom, but further improvements are needed to increase the protection of fundamental rights, given the intrusiveness of the suggested investigative measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russia in Global Affairs
Russia in Global Affairs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信