Guillaume Ha , Ségolène Ferratge , Sina Naserian, Richard Proust, Anne-Charlotte Ponsen, Nassim Arouche, Georges Uzan
{"title":"血管修复中的循环内皮祖细胞","authors":"Guillaume Ha , Ségolène Ferratge , Sina Naserian, Richard Proust, Anne-Charlotte Ponsen, Nassim Arouche, Georges Uzan","doi":"10.1016/j.jocit.2018.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) display pro-angiogenic properties that confer to them a therapeutic potential for treating ischemic lesions. In culture, EPCs generate Endothelial Colony Forming Cells (ECFCs) that have endothelial features but still retain properties of stem/progenitor cells. EPCs can be obtained either from cord blood (CB) or adult blood (AB). For clinical perspectives, both CB-ECFCs and AB-ECFCs have advantages and inconveniences. On one hand, CB-ECFCs are allogenic, with potential immune rejection, but are more clonogenic, proliferative and angiogenic than AB-ECFCs. We have found that these cells display high inter-individual variation in terms of clonogenic profile. Low clonogenic CB-ECFCs had functional properties similar to those of AB-ECFCs. Conversely, a high initial clonogenicity was associated to an enhanced proliferation, angiogenic potential and to an increased expression of genes linked to stem cell-ness. Selecting CB-ECFCs according the initial clonogenicity represent a relevant marker of their potential efficacy on vascular repair. On the other hand, AB-ECFCs are autologous, and should be immunologically well tolerated, but these cells give rise to only few colonies, proliferate less and are less angiogenic than CB-ECFCs. In order to go further in CB-/AB- characterization, we have analyzed the mechanisms of AB-ECFC premature senescence, and shown that GDF15 had pivotal role in this context. Taken together, these new data constitute important steps toward clinical use of EPCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cellular Immunotherapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jocit.2018.09.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating endothelial progenitors in vascular repair\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Ha , Ségolène Ferratge , Sina Naserian, Richard Proust, Anne-Charlotte Ponsen, Nassim Arouche, Georges Uzan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocit.2018.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) display pro-angiogenic properties that confer to them a therapeutic potential for treating ischemic lesions. In culture, EPCs generate Endothelial Colony Forming Cells (ECFCs) that have endothelial features but still retain properties of stem/progenitor cells. EPCs can be obtained either from cord blood (CB) or adult blood (AB). For clinical perspectives, both CB-ECFCs and AB-ECFCs have advantages and inconveniences. On one hand, CB-ECFCs are allogenic, with potential immune rejection, but are more clonogenic, proliferative and angiogenic than AB-ECFCs. We have found that these cells display high inter-individual variation in terms of clonogenic profile. Low clonogenic CB-ECFCs had functional properties similar to those of AB-ECFCs. Conversely, a high initial clonogenicity was associated to an enhanced proliferation, angiogenic potential and to an increased expression of genes linked to stem cell-ness. Selecting CB-ECFCs according the initial clonogenicity represent a relevant marker of their potential efficacy on vascular repair. On the other hand, AB-ECFCs are autologous, and should be immunologically well tolerated, but these cells give rise to only few colonies, proliferate less and are less angiogenic than CB-ECFCs. In order to go further in CB-/AB- characterization, we have analyzed the mechanisms of AB-ECFC premature senescence, and shown that GDF15 had pivotal role in this context. Taken together, these new data constitute important steps toward clinical use of EPCs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cellular Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 13-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jocit.2018.09.004\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cellular Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352177518300098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cellular Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352177518300098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Circulating endothelial progenitors in vascular repair
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) display pro-angiogenic properties that confer to them a therapeutic potential for treating ischemic lesions. In culture, EPCs generate Endothelial Colony Forming Cells (ECFCs) that have endothelial features but still retain properties of stem/progenitor cells. EPCs can be obtained either from cord blood (CB) or adult blood (AB). For clinical perspectives, both CB-ECFCs and AB-ECFCs have advantages and inconveniences. On one hand, CB-ECFCs are allogenic, with potential immune rejection, but are more clonogenic, proliferative and angiogenic than AB-ECFCs. We have found that these cells display high inter-individual variation in terms of clonogenic profile. Low clonogenic CB-ECFCs had functional properties similar to those of AB-ECFCs. Conversely, a high initial clonogenicity was associated to an enhanced proliferation, angiogenic potential and to an increased expression of genes linked to stem cell-ness. Selecting CB-ECFCs according the initial clonogenicity represent a relevant marker of their potential efficacy on vascular repair. On the other hand, AB-ECFCs are autologous, and should be immunologically well tolerated, but these cells give rise to only few colonies, proliferate less and are less angiogenic than CB-ECFCs. In order to go further in CB-/AB- characterization, we have analyzed the mechanisms of AB-ECFC premature senescence, and shown that GDF15 had pivotal role in this context. Taken together, these new data constitute important steps toward clinical use of EPCs.