Pub Date : 2013-06-01 DOI:10.3176/ARCH.2013.1.02
H. Luik
{"title":"Late Bronze Age Bone Crafting in the Eastern Baltic: Standardization of Artefact Types and Individual ingenuity/Noorema Pronksiaja Luutootlemisest Laanemere Idakaldal: Esemetuupide Standardiseerumine Ja Luutootleja Leidlikkus","authors":"H. Luik","doi":"10.3176/ARCH.2013.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Late Bronze Age (about 1300/1100-500 BC) was the time when fortified settlements first appeared as part of the settlement pattern in the eastern Baltic region (Fig. 1). At many of these settlements no traces of significant fortifications have been discovered, but in such cases they have been built in places with natural defensive qualities (Lang 2007a, 55 ff.; 2007b, 39 ff.). The oldest fortified settlements in the Baltic countries come from Lithuania, where they were already established in the last quarter of the 2nd millennium BC; in Latvia they appeared at the end of the 2nd millennium BC (Lang 2007a, 67). The fortified settlements in Estonia date to the first half of the 1st millennium BC (op. cit., 57 ff.). Fortified settlements are indicators of important social and economic changes that took place in the eastern Baltic region at that time. They were centres of authority, as well as of trade and crafts, and played an important role in the organization of bronze circulation (Lang 2007b, 77 ff.). The most important craft was probably bronze casting, witnessed by numerous clay moulds and their fragments found at such settlements (Vasks 1994, pl. XV, XVI; Grigalaviciene 1995, 102 ff.; Sperling 2006, 37 ff.; 2011, 90 ff.). Pottery-making was also of great importance, lots of fragments of both coarse-grained and fine-grained ceramic vessels have been found (Vasks 1994, pl. XVIII ff.; Grigalaviciene 1995, 202 ff., figs 117 ff.; Sperling 2006, 42 ff.; 2011, 157 ff.; Lang 2007a, 125 ff., fgs 58 ff.). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Bone and antler artefacts constitute the most numerous find group after ceramic vessels and clay moulds. The large number of bone and antler artefacts among the finds from the Bronze Age sites demonstrates the importance of bone and antler as raw materials in the society of the period. Although simple ad hoc tools are represented among them, a certain standardization of selected material and shape is characteristic of many bone tool types in the period under discussion. Such artefact types were e.g. bone arrow- and spearheads, harpoon heads and hoes or ard points made of antler, awls of goat/sheep metapodials, antler spoons and handles (e.g. Luik & Maldre 2007; Luik 2011; 2013; Luik et al. 2011). Such standardization probably reflects some degree of organization and control in bone and antler-working. Some foreign bronze artefacts have been replicated in more easily available local materials--bone and antler. For example double buttons imitating Scandinavian bronze double buttons and tutuli were made from antler (Luik & Ots 2007). Bone has been used to make decorative pins in shapes resembling bronze specimens spread across Scandinavia and central Europe. Some of these imitations are carved very skilfully, requiring certain skills and experience from their producer (Lang & Luik in print). People never copy things blindly; copying often involves the idea that the copy gains some power from the thing copied (Hodder 2012, 123). Imitations made in other substances have been regarded as characteristic of periods when important social changes took place in the society (Choyke 2008). Presumably a new social rank arose whose needs such replicated artefacts met and therefore craftspeople with necessary skills were also needed (Luik 2007). But sometimes an ancient craftsman tried to make local standardized artefacts from some other available substance. The aim of the article is to discuss some exceptional finds among Late Bronze Age bone and antler artefacts in the eastern Baltic region and to seek an answer to the question of why artisans chose different raw materials. Standardized artefact, unusual material Three case studies from the fortified settlement sites in the eastern Baltic region are presented where an artefact that usually has a very standardized shape and material was made from another skeletal element for some reason or other. …","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ARCH.2013.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

青铜时代晚期(约公元前1300/1100-500年)是防御工事作为波罗的海东部地区定居模式的一部分首次出现的时期(图1)。在许多这些定居点中,没有发现重大防御工事的痕迹,但在这种情况下,它们已经建在具有天然防御性质的地方(Lang 2007a, 55 ff);2007b, 39页)。波罗的海国家最古老的防御工事来自立陶宛,它们在公元前2000年的最后25年就已经建立起来了;在拉脱维亚,它们出现在公元前2000年末(Lang 2007a, 67)。爱沙尼亚的设防定居点可以追溯到公元前1千年的上半叶(同上,后57页)。坚固的定居点是当时波罗的海东部地区发生的重要社会和经济变化的指标。它们是权威中心,也是贸易和手工艺的中心,在青铜流通的组织中发挥了重要作用(Lang 2007b, 77 ff.)。最重要的工艺可能是青铜铸造,在这些定居点发现了许多粘土模具和它们的碎片(Vasks 1994, pl. XV, XVI;中国生物医学工程学报,1995,32 (2);Sperling 2006, 37 ff.;2011, 90 ff.)。陶器制作也非常重要,发现了许多粗粒和细粒陶瓷容器的碎片(Vasks 1994, pl. XVIII ff.;中国生物医学工程学报,1997,26(2)。,图117 ff;斯珀林2006,42 ff.;2011, 157 ff.;Lang 2007a, 125 ff。(FGS 58 ff)。[图1省略]骨头和鹿角的人工制品是继陶瓷器皿和粘土模具之后发现的数量最多的一类。在青铜器时代遗址中发现的大量骨头和鹿角工艺品表明,骨头和鹿角在该时期社会中作为原材料的重要性。虽然其中有简单的特别工具,但在所讨论的时期,许多骨工具类型的特征是选择材料和形状的一定标准化。这些人工制品类型包括骨箭和矛头、鱼叉头和鹿角制成的锄头或尖、山羊/绵羊跖骨锥子、鹿角勺子和手柄(例如Luik & Maldre 2007;卢伊克2011;2013;Luik et al. 2011)。这种标准化可能反映了骨和鹿角加工的某种程度的组织和控制。一些外国青铜器被用更容易获得的当地材料——骨头和鹿角——复制。例如,双扣模仿斯堪的纳维亚青铜双扣和tutui由鹿角制成(Luik & Ots 2007)。骨头被用来制作装饰别针,形状类似于遍布斯堪的纳维亚半岛和中欧的青铜标本。这些仿制品中的一些雕刻非常熟练,需要一定的技能和经验,从他们的生产者(Lang & Luik印刷)。人们从不盲目地复制事物;复制通常涉及到拷贝从被拷贝的东西中获得一些力量的想法(Hodder 2012, 123)。在其他物质中制造的模仿被认为是社会发生重大社会变化时期的特征(Choyke 2008)。可能出现了一个新的社会阶层,他们需要这种复制的人工制品,因此也需要具有必要技能的工匠(Luik 2007)。但有时,古代工匠试图用其他可用的物质制作当地标准化的人工制品。这篇文章的目的是讨论在波罗的海东部地区的青铜时代晚期的骨头和鹿角人工制品中的一些特殊发现,并寻求为什么工匠选择不同的原材料这个问题的答案。标准化的人工制品,不寻常的材料来自波罗的海东部地区的三个强化定居点的案例研究,其中一个人工制品通常具有非常标准化的形状和材料,是由另一种骨骼元素出于某种原因制成的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Late Bronze Age Bone Crafting in the Eastern Baltic: Standardization of Artefact Types and Individual ingenuity/Noorema Pronksiaja Luutootlemisest Laanemere Idakaldal: Esemetuupide Standardiseerumine Ja Luutootleja Leidlikkus
Introduction The Late Bronze Age (about 1300/1100-500 BC) was the time when fortified settlements first appeared as part of the settlement pattern in the eastern Baltic region (Fig. 1). At many of these settlements no traces of significant fortifications have been discovered, but in such cases they have been built in places with natural defensive qualities (Lang 2007a, 55 ff.; 2007b, 39 ff.). The oldest fortified settlements in the Baltic countries come from Lithuania, where they were already established in the last quarter of the 2nd millennium BC; in Latvia they appeared at the end of the 2nd millennium BC (Lang 2007a, 67). The fortified settlements in Estonia date to the first half of the 1st millennium BC (op. cit., 57 ff.). Fortified settlements are indicators of important social and economic changes that took place in the eastern Baltic region at that time. They were centres of authority, as well as of trade and crafts, and played an important role in the organization of bronze circulation (Lang 2007b, 77 ff.). The most important craft was probably bronze casting, witnessed by numerous clay moulds and their fragments found at such settlements (Vasks 1994, pl. XV, XVI; Grigalaviciene 1995, 102 ff.; Sperling 2006, 37 ff.; 2011, 90 ff.). Pottery-making was also of great importance, lots of fragments of both coarse-grained and fine-grained ceramic vessels have been found (Vasks 1994, pl. XVIII ff.; Grigalaviciene 1995, 202 ff., figs 117 ff.; Sperling 2006, 42 ff.; 2011, 157 ff.; Lang 2007a, 125 ff., fgs 58 ff.). [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Bone and antler artefacts constitute the most numerous find group after ceramic vessels and clay moulds. The large number of bone and antler artefacts among the finds from the Bronze Age sites demonstrates the importance of bone and antler as raw materials in the society of the period. Although simple ad hoc tools are represented among them, a certain standardization of selected material and shape is characteristic of many bone tool types in the period under discussion. Such artefact types were e.g. bone arrow- and spearheads, harpoon heads and hoes or ard points made of antler, awls of goat/sheep metapodials, antler spoons and handles (e.g. Luik & Maldre 2007; Luik 2011; 2013; Luik et al. 2011). Such standardization probably reflects some degree of organization and control in bone and antler-working. Some foreign bronze artefacts have been replicated in more easily available local materials--bone and antler. For example double buttons imitating Scandinavian bronze double buttons and tutuli were made from antler (Luik & Ots 2007). Bone has been used to make decorative pins in shapes resembling bronze specimens spread across Scandinavia and central Europe. Some of these imitations are carved very skilfully, requiring certain skills and experience from their producer (Lang & Luik in print). People never copy things blindly; copying often involves the idea that the copy gains some power from the thing copied (Hodder 2012, 123). Imitations made in other substances have been regarded as characteristic of periods when important social changes took place in the society (Choyke 2008). Presumably a new social rank arose whose needs such replicated artefacts met and therefore craftspeople with necessary skills were also needed (Luik 2007). But sometimes an ancient craftsman tried to make local standardized artefacts from some other available substance. The aim of the article is to discuss some exceptional finds among Late Bronze Age bone and antler artefacts in the eastern Baltic region and to seek an answer to the question of why artisans chose different raw materials. Standardized artefact, unusual material Three case studies from the fortified settlement sites in the eastern Baltic region are presented where an artefact that usually has a very standardized shape and material was made from another skeletal element for some reason or other. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信