知识分子是一个事件:瓦兰人的遗产和它的守护者在苏联后期

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Екатерина Александровна Мельникова
{"title":"知识分子是一个事件:瓦兰人的遗产和它的守护者在苏联后期","authors":"Екатерина Александровна Мельникова","doi":"10.1353/imp.2023.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY:The articles argues that during the last Soviet decades, preservationist activism focused on sites of historical heritage mobilized public interest and produced cohesion of the Soviet intelligentsia as a collective social actor and thus a distinctive social group. This approach deconstructs the notion of \"intelligentsia\" as an elusive self-referential entity – a stable community of formal status. Instead, \"intelligentsia\" is interpreted as a situational product of a social process that demonstrated groupness only inasmuch as its participants shared common scenarios of activism. The article specifically studies the case of the Valaam archipelago in Lake Ladoga, the site of a fourteenth-century Orthodox monastery, as a venue for developing in the 1960s–1980s the cohesiveness of the intelligentsia as an emotional community and a collective social agent. Since the mid-1960s, Valaam has been a popular tourist destination that attracts Soviet citizens seeking to \"perform cultureness\" by experiencing exquisite \"cultural consumption.\" With old monastery buildings neglected or occupied by retirement homes for war veterans, Valaam emblematized cultural ruins. As a powerful symbol of historical discontinuity and loss, it was an ideal object for the rhetoric of salvation developed by Soviet preservationists. People who shared this rhetoric and concern coalesced into a group that has typically been identified as \"intelligentsia.\" Some of the activists moved to live on Valaam more or less permanently, forming the local cultural elite who considered it a place for communal work and spirituality. Through the late 1980s, the community of Valaam preservationists mobilized and politicized by escalating the rhetoric of loss and identifying the Russian Orthodox Church as a force capable of restoring Valaam to its alleged former glory. Such rhetoric and the practical scenario brought together various groups of preservationists into a single community of social action. However, when the Russian Orthodox Church eventually fully legalized and firmly established itself in the political sphere, the result was disappointing to the intelligentsia activists. The return of the former monastery to the church, an event wholeheartedly propagated by the old Valaam keepers, made the intelligentsia redundant and even discredited them as members of the Soviet establishment. No longer having a common mission and single object of devotion, they lost their former discursive unity and group cohesiveness, and thus experienced bitter disillusionment with their goal and mission.","PeriodicalId":45377,"journal":{"name":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Интеллигенция как событие: валаамское наследие и его хранители в позднем СССР\",\"authors\":\"Екатерина Александровна Мельникова\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/imp.2023.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY:The articles argues that during the last Soviet decades, preservationist activism focused on sites of historical heritage mobilized public interest and produced cohesion of the Soviet intelligentsia as a collective social actor and thus a distinctive social group. This approach deconstructs the notion of \\\"intelligentsia\\\" as an elusive self-referential entity – a stable community of formal status. Instead, \\\"intelligentsia\\\" is interpreted as a situational product of a social process that demonstrated groupness only inasmuch as its participants shared common scenarios of activism. The article specifically studies the case of the Valaam archipelago in Lake Ladoga, the site of a fourteenth-century Orthodox monastery, as a venue for developing in the 1960s–1980s the cohesiveness of the intelligentsia as an emotional community and a collective social agent. Since the mid-1960s, Valaam has been a popular tourist destination that attracts Soviet citizens seeking to \\\"perform cultureness\\\" by experiencing exquisite \\\"cultural consumption.\\\" With old monastery buildings neglected or occupied by retirement homes for war veterans, Valaam emblematized cultural ruins. As a powerful symbol of historical discontinuity and loss, it was an ideal object for the rhetoric of salvation developed by Soviet preservationists. People who shared this rhetoric and concern coalesced into a group that has typically been identified as \\\"intelligentsia.\\\" Some of the activists moved to live on Valaam more or less permanently, forming the local cultural elite who considered it a place for communal work and spirituality. Through the late 1980s, the community of Valaam preservationists mobilized and politicized by escalating the rhetoric of loss and identifying the Russian Orthodox Church as a force capable of restoring Valaam to its alleged former glory. Such rhetoric and the practical scenario brought together various groups of preservationists into a single community of social action. However, when the Russian Orthodox Church eventually fully legalized and firmly established itself in the political sphere, the result was disappointing to the intelligentsia activists. The return of the former monastery to the church, an event wholeheartedly propagated by the old Valaam keepers, made the intelligentsia redundant and even discredited them as members of the Soviet establishment. No longer having a common mission and single object of devotion, they lost their former discursive unity and group cohesiveness, and thus experienced bitter disillusionment with their goal and mission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ab Imperio-Studies of New Imperial History and Nationalism in the Post-Soviet Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2023.0013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:文章认为,在苏联最后的几十年里,保护主义活动集中在历史遗产遗址上,动员了公共利益,并使苏联知识分子作为一个集体的社会行动者产生了凝聚力,从而成为一个独特的社会群体。这种方法解构了“知识分子”作为一种难以捉摸的自我参照实体的概念——一种具有正式地位的稳定社区。相反,“知识分子”被解释为一种社会过程的情景产物,这种社会过程仅在其参与者分享共同的行动主义情景时才表现出群体性。本文特别研究了拉多加湖的瓦拉姆群岛的案例,这是一座14世纪东正教修道院的所在地,在20世纪60年代至80年代,作为一个情感社区和集体社会代理人,知识分子的凝聚力得到了发展。自20世纪60年代中期以来,瓦拉姆一直是一个受欢迎的旅游目的地,吸引了寻求通过体验精致的“文化消费”来“表演文化”的苏联公民。由于古老的修道院建筑被忽视或被退伍军人的养老院所占据,瓦拉姆成为文化废墟的象征。作为历史中断和损失的有力象征,它是苏联保护主义者提出的拯救修辞的理想对象。拥有同样的言论和担忧的人联合成一个通常被称为“知识界”的群体。一些活动人士或多或少地永久居住在瓦拉姆,形成了当地的文化精英,他们认为这里是一个社区工作和精神生活的地方。在整个20世纪80年代后期,瓦拉姆保护主义者社区动员起来,通过不断升级损失的言论,并将俄罗斯东正教教会视为能够恢复瓦拉姆所谓的昔日辉煌的力量,将其政治化。这样的修辞和实际情况将不同的保护主义者群体聚集到一个社会行动的单一社区。然而,当俄罗斯东正教最终完全合法化并在政治领域站稳脚跟时,其结果令知识分子积极分子感到失望。从前的修道院回归教堂,这一事件由瓦拉姆的老守门人全心全意地宣传,使知识分子变得多余,甚至使他们失去了作为苏维埃体制成员的信誉。他们不再有共同的使命和单一的奉献对象,失去了以往话语的统一性和群体的凝聚力,从而对自己的目标和使命产生了痛苦的幻灭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Интеллигенция как событие: валаамское наследие и его хранители в позднем СССР
SUMMARY:The articles argues that during the last Soviet decades, preservationist activism focused on sites of historical heritage mobilized public interest and produced cohesion of the Soviet intelligentsia as a collective social actor and thus a distinctive social group. This approach deconstructs the notion of "intelligentsia" as an elusive self-referential entity – a stable community of formal status. Instead, "intelligentsia" is interpreted as a situational product of a social process that demonstrated groupness only inasmuch as its participants shared common scenarios of activism. The article specifically studies the case of the Valaam archipelago in Lake Ladoga, the site of a fourteenth-century Orthodox monastery, as a venue for developing in the 1960s–1980s the cohesiveness of the intelligentsia as an emotional community and a collective social agent. Since the mid-1960s, Valaam has been a popular tourist destination that attracts Soviet citizens seeking to "perform cultureness" by experiencing exquisite "cultural consumption." With old monastery buildings neglected or occupied by retirement homes for war veterans, Valaam emblematized cultural ruins. As a powerful symbol of historical discontinuity and loss, it was an ideal object for the rhetoric of salvation developed by Soviet preservationists. People who shared this rhetoric and concern coalesced into a group that has typically been identified as "intelligentsia." Some of the activists moved to live on Valaam more or less permanently, forming the local cultural elite who considered it a place for communal work and spirituality. Through the late 1980s, the community of Valaam preservationists mobilized and politicized by escalating the rhetoric of loss and identifying the Russian Orthodox Church as a force capable of restoring Valaam to its alleged former glory. Such rhetoric and the practical scenario brought together various groups of preservationists into a single community of social action. However, when the Russian Orthodox Church eventually fully legalized and firmly established itself in the political sphere, the result was disappointing to the intelligentsia activists. The return of the former monastery to the church, an event wholeheartedly propagated by the old Valaam keepers, made the intelligentsia redundant and even discredited them as members of the Soviet establishment. No longer having a common mission and single object of devotion, they lost their former discursive unity and group cohesiveness, and thus experienced bitter disillusionment with their goal and mission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信