{"title":"在忠实的达米科的音乐评论中,1900年和后现代主义。对大学课程历史方法的思考","authors":"R. Pozzi","doi":"10.7358/ecps-2019-020-pozz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines a university course held in 1978 by the music critic Fedele d’Amico (Rome, 1912 - Rome, 1990) at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Rome La Sapienza. The course offers a reading of the twentieth century, through the analysis of the main movements and composers of the first half of the century, highlighting the historiographical method and the teacher’s critical positions. The historiographical method of Fedele d’Amico attempts to identify the dominant character of the twentieth century through a comparison with nineteenth-century music. This character resides, according to d’Amico, in the general tendency of 20th century composers to be «anti-nineteenth century», to mark the discontinuity with respect to the previous century. In the more radical experiences of modernity represented above all by expressionism, dodecaphony and the serial avant-garde of the Darmstadt mouvement, d’Amico underlines the destruction of the linguistic character of music which, according to him, is the foundation of understanding in musical listening. The author, emphasizing the reductionism of some of d’Amico’s statements, avoids a generic charge of conservatism by relating them to the crisis of modernism and to the spread, in the criticism of the arts during the seventies, of a new postmodern image of the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":41872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"245-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novecento e postmodernità nella critica musicale di Fedele d’Amico. Riflessioni sul metodo storiografico di un corso universitario\",\"authors\":\"R. Pozzi\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/ecps-2019-020-pozz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines a university course held in 1978 by the music critic Fedele d’Amico (Rome, 1912 - Rome, 1990) at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Rome La Sapienza. The course offers a reading of the twentieth century, through the analysis of the main movements and composers of the first half of the century, highlighting the historiographical method and the teacher’s critical positions. The historiographical method of Fedele d’Amico attempts to identify the dominant character of the twentieth century through a comparison with nineteenth-century music. This character resides, according to d’Amico, in the general tendency of 20th century composers to be «anti-nineteenth century», to mark the discontinuity with respect to the previous century. In the more radical experiences of modernity represented above all by expressionism, dodecaphony and the serial avant-garde of the Darmstadt mouvement, d’Amico underlines the destruction of the linguistic character of music which, according to him, is the foundation of understanding in musical listening. The author, emphasizing the reductionism of some of d’Amico’s statements, avoids a generic charge of conservatism by relating them to the crisis of modernism and to the spread, in the criticism of the arts during the seventies, of a new postmodern image of the twentieth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"245-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2019-020-pozz\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2019-020-pozz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这篇文章考察了1978年由音乐评论家Fedele d 'Amico(罗马,1912 - 1990)在罗马大学文学院开设的一门大学课程。本课程通过对20世纪上半叶的主要运动和作曲家的分析,提供了对20世纪的阅读,突出了史学方法和教师的批判立场。Fedele d 'Amico的史学方法试图通过与19世纪音乐的比较来确定20世纪的主要特征。根据达米科的说法,这种特征存在于20世纪作曲家“反19世纪”的总体趋势中,以标志与前一个世纪的不连续性。在表现主义、十二音符和达姆施塔特运动的一系列先锋派所代表的更为激进的现代性经验中,达米科强调了音乐的语言特征的破坏,根据他的说法,这是理解音乐聆听的基础。作者强调了d 'Amico的一些陈述的还原论,通过将它们与现代主义的危机和传播联系起来,避免了保守主义的一般指控,在70年代的艺术批评中,20世纪的新后现代形象。
Novecento e postmodernità nella critica musicale di Fedele d’Amico. Riflessioni sul metodo storiografico di un corso universitario
The article examines a university course held in 1978 by the music critic Fedele d’Amico (Rome, 1912 - Rome, 1990) at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Rome La Sapienza. The course offers a reading of the twentieth century, through the analysis of the main movements and composers of the first half of the century, highlighting the historiographical method and the teacher’s critical positions. The historiographical method of Fedele d’Amico attempts to identify the dominant character of the twentieth century through a comparison with nineteenth-century music. This character resides, according to d’Amico, in the general tendency of 20th century composers to be «anti-nineteenth century», to mark the discontinuity with respect to the previous century. In the more radical experiences of modernity represented above all by expressionism, dodecaphony and the serial avant-garde of the Darmstadt mouvement, d’Amico underlines the destruction of the linguistic character of music which, according to him, is the foundation of understanding in musical listening. The author, emphasizing the reductionism of some of d’Amico’s statements, avoids a generic charge of conservatism by relating them to the crisis of modernism and to the spread, in the criticism of the arts during the seventies, of a new postmodern image of the twentieth century.