剖宫产患者硬膜穿刺后头痛的评估:25g Quinke V/S Whitacre针的比较

Sujata Ghosh, Sushil Nayak, Saroj Roy
{"title":"剖宫产患者硬膜穿刺后头痛的评估:25g Quinke V/S Whitacre针的比较","authors":"Sujata Ghosh, Sushil Nayak, Saroj Roy","doi":"10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: PDPH (post dural puncture headache) is a common complication Methodology: In this randomised prospective single blind study, 200 patients undergoing Elective Caesarian Section were divided into two groups Q & W (n=100), each to receive subarachnoid block with Quinke needle (25G) and Whitcre Needle (25G) respectively. Assessment of the incidence of postdural puncture headache was done on the 1 st , 2 nd & 3 rd and 5 th postoperative days using a standard questionnaire. The presence, severity duration and nature and onset of headache was assessed. Results: The demographic profile was similar in both groups Q & W. The incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) was greater with 25 G Quinke’s needle. The intensity and duration of PDPH was higher in group Q ie in whom Quinkes needle was used. Nausea and vomiting was also greater in group Q. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of postdural puncture headache using conical tipped pencil point 25G Whitacre spinal needle. There was no statistical difference in the onset of PDPH and the accompanying symptoms with the use of Quinke or Whitacre needles.","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section: A Comparison between 25 G Quinke V/S Whitacre Needles\",\"authors\":\"Sujata Ghosh, Sushil Nayak, Saroj Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: PDPH (post dural puncture headache) is a common complication Methodology: In this randomised prospective single blind study, 200 patients undergoing Elective Caesarian Section were divided into two groups Q & W (n=100), each to receive subarachnoid block with Quinke needle (25G) and Whitcre Needle (25G) respectively. Assessment of the incidence of postdural puncture headache was done on the 1 st , 2 nd & 3 rd and 5 th postoperative days using a standard questionnaire. The presence, severity duration and nature and onset of headache was assessed. Results: The demographic profile was similar in both groups Q & W. The incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) was greater with 25 G Quinke’s needle. The intensity and duration of PDPH was higher in group Q ie in whom Quinkes needle was used. Nausea and vomiting was also greater in group Q. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of postdural puncture headache using conical tipped pencil point 25G Whitacre spinal needle. There was no statistical difference in the onset of PDPH and the accompanying symptoms with the use of Quinke or Whitacre needles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of medicine and medical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是常见并发症。方法:本随机前瞻性单盲研究将200例择期剖宫产患者分为Q组和W组(n=100),分别用Quinke针(25G)和Whitcre针(25G)进行蛛网膜下腔阻滞。术后第1天、第2天、第3天和第5天采用标准问卷评估硬脊膜穿刺后头痛的发生率。评估头痛的存在、严重程度、持续时间、性质和发作。结果:两组患者的人口学特征相似(Q和w)。使用25g奎克针时,硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的发生率更高。使用Quinkes针的Q组PDPH强度和持续时间较高。结论:锥形笔尖25G Whitacre脊髓针对硬脊膜后穿刺头痛的发生率有统计学意义的降低。使用Quinke或Whitacre针头在PDPH的发病和伴随症状方面没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section: A Comparison between 25 G Quinke V/S Whitacre Needles
Background: PDPH (post dural puncture headache) is a common complication Methodology: In this randomised prospective single blind study, 200 patients undergoing Elective Caesarian Section were divided into two groups Q & W (n=100), each to receive subarachnoid block with Quinke needle (25G) and Whitcre Needle (25G) respectively. Assessment of the incidence of postdural puncture headache was done on the 1 st , 2 nd & 3 rd and 5 th postoperative days using a standard questionnaire. The presence, severity duration and nature and onset of headache was assessed. Results: The demographic profile was similar in both groups Q & W. The incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) was greater with 25 G Quinke’s needle. The intensity and duration of PDPH was higher in group Q ie in whom Quinkes needle was used. Nausea and vomiting was also greater in group Q. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of postdural puncture headache using conical tipped pencil point 25G Whitacre spinal needle. There was no statistical difference in the onset of PDPH and the accompanying symptoms with the use of Quinke or Whitacre needles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信