罕见肿瘤:对正义的呼吁

E. Bloustein
{"title":"罕见肿瘤:对正义的呼吁","authors":"E. Bloustein","doi":"10.2174/1874189401004010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While cancers with 40,000 or fewer diagnoses a year are considered rare, they make up about 25% of cancer mortalities. Despite this, rare cancers remain largely ignored by investigators because of insufficient research funding. Their neglect has been justified in the belief that a focus on common tumors will yield benefits for all tumors, including rare tumors. This however has not happened. One solution proposed to address this problem is to mobilize those diagnosed with rare tumors to advocate for research in rare tumors. But is it fair to place a burden of self-advocacy on some cancer patients but not on others? A better solution, proposed here, invokes a theory of justice developed by John Rawls, and offers an alternative statement of the ethical basis for involving human subjects in research and suggestions for restructuring the cancer research enterprise itself.","PeriodicalId":87833,"journal":{"name":"The open clinical cancer journal","volume":"5 4 1","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice\",\"authors\":\"E. Bloustein\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874189401004010003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While cancers with 40,000 or fewer diagnoses a year are considered rare, they make up about 25% of cancer mortalities. Despite this, rare cancers remain largely ignored by investigators because of insufficient research funding. Their neglect has been justified in the belief that a focus on common tumors will yield benefits for all tumors, including rare tumors. This however has not happened. One solution proposed to address this problem is to mobilize those diagnosed with rare tumors to advocate for research in rare tumors. But is it fair to place a burden of self-advocacy on some cancer patients but not on others? A better solution, proposed here, invokes a theory of justice developed by John Rawls, and offers an alternative statement of the ethical basis for involving human subjects in research and suggestions for restructuring the cancer research enterprise itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open clinical cancer journal\",\"volume\":\"5 4 1\",\"pages\":\"3-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open clinical cancer journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874189401004010003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open clinical cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874189401004010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然每年确诊人数少于4万的癌症被认为是罕见的,但它们占癌症死亡人数的25%左右。尽管如此,由于研究经费不足,研究人员在很大程度上仍然忽视了罕见癌症。他们的忽视是合理的,因为他们相信,对常见肿瘤的关注将对所有肿瘤,包括罕见肿瘤产生益处。然而,这并没有发生。针对这一问题的一个解决方案是动员那些被诊断患有罕见肿瘤的人来倡导对罕见肿瘤的研究。但是,把自我辩护的重担放在一些癌症患者身上,而不是其他人身上,这公平吗?这里提出了一个更好的解决方案,它援引了约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)提出的正义理论,并提供了另一种关于将人类受试者纳入研究的伦理基础的声明,以及重组癌症研究事业本身的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rare Tumors: An Appeal for Justice
While cancers with 40,000 or fewer diagnoses a year are considered rare, they make up about 25% of cancer mortalities. Despite this, rare cancers remain largely ignored by investigators because of insufficient research funding. Their neglect has been justified in the belief that a focus on common tumors will yield benefits for all tumors, including rare tumors. This however has not happened. One solution proposed to address this problem is to mobilize those diagnosed with rare tumors to advocate for research in rare tumors. But is it fair to place a burden of self-advocacy on some cancer patients but not on others? A better solution, proposed here, invokes a theory of justice developed by John Rawls, and offers an alternative statement of the ethical basis for involving human subjects in research and suggestions for restructuring the cancer research enterprise itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信