Å. Andreassen, P. Brandtzæg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg
{"title":"欧盟根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48)对抗虫和耐除草剂转基因玉米MIR604 x GA21的食品/饲料和环境风险评估","authors":"Å. Andreassen, P. Brandtzæg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary. \n The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 (Unique Identifier SYN-IR6Ø4-5 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since 22 December 2011 (Commission Decision 2011/892/EC). Genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, MIR604 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2006, 2008, 2009b,c,d,e, 2010, 2012, 2013a,b,c,d). \n The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize MI604 x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant. \n The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated MIR604 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c). \n The scientific risk assessment of maize MIR604 x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes. \n It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms. \n Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines MIR604 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize MIR604 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental events. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize MIR604 x GA21 and its parental events MIR604 and GA21 as adequate. \nComparative Assessment: Comparative analyses of agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in USA in 2005 indicate that maize stack MIR604 x GA21 is equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins. The field evaluations support a conclusion of no phenotypic changes indicative of increased plant weed/pest potential of maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize varieties. \nThe applicant has performed a compositional analysis on the triple-stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 instead of maize MIR604 x GA21. The analysis was performed on plant materials from maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 and a near-isogenic control hybrid from field trials in USA in 2006. With the exception of small intermittent variations, no biologically significant compositional differences were found between the triple-stack and the near-isogenic control. The results of the study are considered valid by EFSA also for maize MIR604 x GA21, since maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 encompasses the transgenic properties of maize MIR604 x GA21. This is in accordance with the EFSA guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events (EFSA 2007b). \n The VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that the applicant should have performed a compositional analysis of maize MIR604 x GA21 and not only referred to analyses of the triple- stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21. However, based on all information available, including agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials with maize MIR604 x GA21, a feeding study on broilers showing nutritional equivalence to non-GM maize, and assessments of the single events MIR604 and GA21, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that forage and grain from maize MIR604 x GA21 are compositionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart. \n Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse effects of maize MIR604 x GA21, and shows that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS, proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions. \n Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \n Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 includes import and processing of maize stack MIR604 x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize MIR604 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize MIR604 x GA21. \n Maize MIR604 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize MIR604 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue. \n Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \n The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food/feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-resistant and Herbicide-tolerant Genetically Modified Maize MIR604 x GA21 in the European Union under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48)\",\"authors\":\"Å. Andreassen, P. Brandtzæg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary. \\n The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 (Unique Identifier SYN-IR6Ø4-5 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since 22 December 2011 (Commission Decision 2011/892/EC). Genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, MIR604 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2006, 2008, 2009b,c,d,e, 2010, 2012, 2013a,b,c,d). \\n The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize MI604 x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant. \\n The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated MIR604 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c). \\n The scientific risk assessment of maize MIR604 x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes. \\n It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms. \\n Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines MIR604 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize MIR604 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental events. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize MIR604 x GA21 and its parental events MIR604 and GA21 as adequate. \\nComparative Assessment: Comparative analyses of agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in USA in 2005 indicate that maize stack MIR604 x GA21 is equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins. The field evaluations support a conclusion of no phenotypic changes indicative of increased plant weed/pest potential of maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize varieties. \\nThe applicant has performed a compositional analysis on the triple-stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 instead of maize MIR604 x GA21. The analysis was performed on plant materials from maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 and a near-isogenic control hybrid from field trials in USA in 2006. With the exception of small intermittent variations, no biologically significant compositional differences were found between the triple-stack and the near-isogenic control. The results of the study are considered valid by EFSA also for maize MIR604 x GA21, since maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 encompasses the transgenic properties of maize MIR604 x GA21. This is in accordance with the EFSA guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events (EFSA 2007b). \\n The VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that the applicant should have performed a compositional analysis of maize MIR604 x GA21 and not only referred to analyses of the triple- stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21. However, based on all information available, including agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials with maize MIR604 x GA21, a feeding study on broilers showing nutritional equivalence to non-GM maize, and assessments of the single events MIR604 and GA21, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that forage and grain from maize MIR604 x GA21 are compositionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart. \\n Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse effects of maize MIR604 x GA21, and shows that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS, proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions. \\n Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \\n Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 includes import and processing of maize stack MIR604 x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize MIR604 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize MIR604 x GA21. \\n Maize MIR604 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize MIR604 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue. \\n Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \\n The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
田间评价支持以下结论:与常规玉米品种相比,玉米MIR604 × GA21没有表型变化表明植物杂草/害虫潜力增加。申请人对三叠Bt11 × MIR604 × GA21进行了成分分析,而不是玉米MIR604 × GA21。对2006年在美国进行大田试验的玉米Bt11 × MIR604 × GA21和一个近等基因对照杂交种的植株材料进行了分析。除了小的间歇性变化外,在三叠和近等基因对照之间没有发现生物学上显著的成分差异。EFSA认为该研究结果同样适用于玉米MIR604 × GA21,因为玉米Bt11 × MIR604 × GA21包含玉米MIR604 × GA21的转基因特性。这符合欧洲食品安全局关于含有堆叠转化事件的转基因植物风险评估的指导文件(EFSA 2007b)。VKM转基因专家小组认为,申请人应该对玉米MIR604 × GA21进行成分分析,而不仅仅是对三叠Bt11 × MIR604 × GA21进行分析。然而,基于所有可获得的信息,包括玉米MIR604 × GA21田间试验的农艺和表型数据,一项显示与非转基因玉米营养等效的肉鸡饲养研究,以及对MIR604和GA21单一事件的评估,VKM转基因专家组得出结论,玉米MIR604 × GA21的饲料和谷物在成分上与传统玉米相当。食品和饲料风险评估:一项对肉鸡的全食物喂养研究未显示玉米MIR604 × GA21有任何不良影响,并表明玉米MIR604 × GA21在营养上与传统玉米相当。mCry3A、PMI和mEPSPS蛋白与其他已知毒素或IgE过敏原没有序列相似性,也没有报道它们引起IgE介导的过敏反应。然而,一些研究表明,哭泣蛋白在过敏反应中作为佐剂的潜在作用。根据目前的知识,VKM转基因专家小组得出结论,玉米MIR604 x GA21在营养上与传统玉米品种相当。与传统玉米相比,mCry3A、PMI或mEPSPS蛋白不太可能在基于玉米MIR604 × GA21的食品或饲料中引入毒性或致敏性。环境风险评估:申请EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48的范围包括进口和加工用于食品和饲料用途的玉米堆MIR604 x GA21。考虑到玉米MIR604 × GA21的预期用途(不包括种植),环境风险评估涉及在运输和加工过程中有活性的谷物意外释放到环境中,以及间接暴露,主要是通过饲喂玉米MIR604 × GA21谷物的动物的粪便和粪便。玉米MIR604 x GA21没有改变生存、繁殖或传播特性,并且没有迹象表明,在玉米MIR604 x GA21的种子意外释放到环境中的情况下,野生玉米植物传播和建立的可能性增加。玉米是玉米属在欧洲的唯一代表,在栽培之外没有杂交相容的野生或杂草亲缘种。VKM转基因生物小组认为,在挪威,基因从偶尔的野生转基因玉米植物流向传统玉米品种的风险可以忽略不计。考虑到作为食品和饲料的预期用途,转基因生物小组认为与生物和非生物环境的相互作用不是一个问题。总体结论:基于目前的知识,VKM转基因专家小组得出结论,玉米MIR604 x GA21在营养上与传统玉米品种相当。与传统玉米相比,mCry3A、PMI或mEPSPS蛋白不太可能在基于玉米MIR604 × GA21的食品或饲料中引入毒性或致敏性。VKM转基因生物小组同样得出结论,根据目前的知识,玉米MIR604 x GA21在挪威的预期用途方面与传统玉米品种的环境风险相当。
Food/feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-resistant and Herbicide-tolerant Genetically Modified Maize MIR604 x GA21 in the European Union under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48)
In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility. The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorised in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary.
The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 (Unique Identifier SYN-IR6Ø4-5 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since 22 December 2011 (Commission Decision 2011/892/EC). Genetically modified maize MIR604 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, MIR604 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2006, 2008, 2009b,c,d,e, 2010, 2012, 2013a,b,c,d).
The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize MI604 x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.
The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated MIR604 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c).
The scientific risk assessment of maize MIR604 x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes.
It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.
Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines MIR604 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize MIR604 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental events. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize MIR604 x GA21 and its parental events MIR604 and GA21 as adequate.
Comparative Assessment: Comparative analyses of agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in USA in 2005 indicate that maize stack MIR604 x GA21 is equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS proteins. The field evaluations support a conclusion of no phenotypic changes indicative of increased plant weed/pest potential of maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize varieties.
The applicant has performed a compositional analysis on the triple-stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 instead of maize MIR604 x GA21. The analysis was performed on plant materials from maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 and a near-isogenic control hybrid from field trials in USA in 2006. With the exception of small intermittent variations, no biologically significant compositional differences were found between the triple-stack and the near-isogenic control. The results of the study are considered valid by EFSA also for maize MIR604 x GA21, since maize Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21 encompasses the transgenic properties of maize MIR604 x GA21. This is in accordance with the EFSA guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events (EFSA 2007b).
The VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that the applicant should have performed a compositional analysis of maize MIR604 x GA21 and not only referred to analyses of the triple- stack Bt11 x MIR604 x GA21. However, based on all information available, including agronomic and phenotypic data from field trials with maize MIR604 x GA21, a feeding study on broilers showing nutritional equivalence to non-GM maize, and assessments of the single events MIR604 and GA21, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that forage and grain from maize MIR604 x GA21 are compositionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart.
Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse effects of maize MIR604 x GA21, and shows that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The mCry3A, PMI and mEPSPS, proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions.
Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize.
Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/48 includes import and processing of maize stack MIR604 x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize MIR604 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize MIR604 x GA21.
Maize MIR604 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize MIR604 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue.
Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the mCry3A, PMI or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize MIR604 x GA21 compared to conventional maize.
The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize MIR604 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.