宗教自由:普世主义主张,伊斯兰世界的抵抗,重新概念化

Fawaizul Umam
{"title":"宗教自由:普世主义主张,伊斯兰世界的抵抗,重新概念化","authors":"Fawaizul Umam","doi":"10.14421/ESENSIA.V21I2.2234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractReligious freedom is one type of human rights which caused major resistance to the universalism claim of human rights in Muslim countries. This article attempted to describe why that resistance arose and how Islam should reconceptualize religious freedom. The religious freedom issues are important to be explored in the context of contemporary Islamic studies because its value and scope tended to be limited in the Islamic conservatism discourse. One of the issues is the fallacy in categorizing the apostasy (riddah)—a non-derogable right—verdicted as a blasphemy in Islam. By reconceptualizing the Islamic meaning of religious freedom, this study applied document analysis to enrich the contemporary Islamist studies, especially to postulate the significant relationship between Islam and human rights and to argue that Islam actually legitimized religious freedom as one of the non-derogable rights.","PeriodicalId":33284,"journal":{"name":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Religious Freedom: Universalism Claim, Resistance of Islamic World, Reconceptualization\",\"authors\":\"Fawaizul Umam\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/ESENSIA.V21I2.2234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractReligious freedom is one type of human rights which caused major resistance to the universalism claim of human rights in Muslim countries. This article attempted to describe why that resistance arose and how Islam should reconceptualize religious freedom. The religious freedom issues are important to be explored in the context of contemporary Islamic studies because its value and scope tended to be limited in the Islamic conservatism discourse. One of the issues is the fallacy in categorizing the apostasy (riddah)—a non-derogable right—verdicted as a blasphemy in Islam. By reconceptualizing the Islamic meaning of religious freedom, this study applied document analysis to enrich the contemporary Islamist studies, especially to postulate the significant relationship between Islam and human rights and to argue that Islam actually legitimized religious freedom as one of the non-derogable rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/ESENSIA.V21I2.2234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ESENSIA.V21I2.2234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要宗教自由作为一种人权,在穆斯林国家引起了对普世主义人权主张的强烈抵制。本文试图描述为什么会出现这种抵抗,以及伊斯兰教应该如何重新定义宗教自由。宗教自由问题在当代伊斯兰研究的背景下是很重要的,因为它的价值和范围往往在伊斯兰保守主义话语中受到限制。其中一个问题是将叛教(riddah)——一种不可贬损的权利——归类为伊斯兰教中的亵渎行为的谬论。通过对宗教自由在伊斯兰教中的意义进行重新概念化,本研究运用文献分析丰富了当代伊斯兰教的研究,特别是对伊斯兰教与人权之间的重要关系进行了假设,并论证了伊斯兰教实际上将宗教自由合法化为不可减损的权利之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Religious Freedom: Universalism Claim, Resistance of Islamic World, Reconceptualization
AbstractReligious freedom is one type of human rights which caused major resistance to the universalism claim of human rights in Muslim countries. This article attempted to describe why that resistance arose and how Islam should reconceptualize religious freedom. The religious freedom issues are important to be explored in the context of contemporary Islamic studies because its value and scope tended to be limited in the Islamic conservatism discourse. One of the issues is the fallacy in categorizing the apostasy (riddah)—a non-derogable right—verdicted as a blasphemy in Islam. By reconceptualizing the Islamic meaning of religious freedom, this study applied document analysis to enrich the contemporary Islamist studies, especially to postulate the significant relationship between Islam and human rights and to argue that Islam actually legitimized religious freedom as one of the non-derogable rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信