慢性星云:处理转移性乳腺癌在英国

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Cinzia Greco
{"title":"慢性星云:处理转移性乳腺癌在英国","authors":"Cinzia Greco","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2022.2041547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I explore how the concept of chronicity is mobilised by different actors in reference to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the transformation of the condition as a consequence of medical innovations. I do so by using data collected in the UK between 2017 and 2019 through in-depth interviews with medical professionals involved in the treatment of MBC and with patients living with MBC. I show how chronicity appears as a multidimensional and uncertain concept, which I analyse through the image of the nebula. While the medical literature tends to consider MBC chronic or on route to chronicisation, the medical professionals interviewed were uncertain as to whether MBC can be considered a chronic disease, and attempted to discuss chronicity through survival times, the kind of management possible for the disease, and how it compares to other conditions more commonly considered chronic. In some cases, the patients considered the idea of chronicity a source of hope or a way to link their condition to those of people with other diseases; however, they generally rejected the definition as inappropriate for their experience of the illness. Analysing the fluid uses of the concept of chronicity in the case of MBC contributes to the debate within medical anthropology on how medical categories acquire different values and uses and on the circulation of meanings between the biomedical context and the patient experience.","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"63 1","pages":"107 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nebula of chronicity: dealing with metastatic breast cancer in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Cinzia Greco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13648470.2022.2041547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, I explore how the concept of chronicity is mobilised by different actors in reference to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the transformation of the condition as a consequence of medical innovations. I do so by using data collected in the UK between 2017 and 2019 through in-depth interviews with medical professionals involved in the treatment of MBC and with patients living with MBC. I show how chronicity appears as a multidimensional and uncertain concept, which I analyse through the image of the nebula. While the medical literature tends to consider MBC chronic or on route to chronicisation, the medical professionals interviewed were uncertain as to whether MBC can be considered a chronic disease, and attempted to discuss chronicity through survival times, the kind of management possible for the disease, and how it compares to other conditions more commonly considered chronic. In some cases, the patients considered the idea of chronicity a source of hope or a way to link their condition to those of people with other diseases; however, they generally rejected the definition as inappropriate for their experience of the illness. Analysing the fluid uses of the concept of chronicity in the case of MBC contributes to the debate within medical anthropology on how medical categories acquire different values and uses and on the circulation of meanings between the biomedical context and the patient experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2041547\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2041547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我探讨了慢性的概念是如何被不同的参与者动员,参考转移性乳腺癌(MBC)和条件的转变作为医学创新的结果。为此,我使用了2017年至2019年在英国收集的数据,这些数据是通过对参与MBC治疗的医疗专业人员和MBC患者的深入访谈收集的。我展示了慢性是如何作为一个多维度和不确定的概念出现的,我通过星云的图像分析了这一点。虽然医学文献倾向于认为MBC是慢性疾病或正在走向慢性疾病,但接受采访的医疗专业人员不确定MBC是否可以被视为慢性疾病,并试图通过生存时间、疾病可能的管理方式以及与其他通常被认为是慢性的疾病相比如何讨论慢性疾病。在某些情况下,患者认为慢性病是希望的源泉,或者是将他们的病情与患有其他疾病的人的病情联系起来的一种方式;然而,他们普遍拒绝这个定义,认为这与他们的疾病经历不合适。在MBC案例中分析慢性病概念的流动用途有助于医学人类学内部关于医疗类别如何获得不同价值和用途以及生物医学背景和患者经验之间意义循环的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The nebula of chronicity: dealing with metastatic breast cancer in the UK
Abstract In this article, I explore how the concept of chronicity is mobilised by different actors in reference to metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the transformation of the condition as a consequence of medical innovations. I do so by using data collected in the UK between 2017 and 2019 through in-depth interviews with medical professionals involved in the treatment of MBC and with patients living with MBC. I show how chronicity appears as a multidimensional and uncertain concept, which I analyse through the image of the nebula. While the medical literature tends to consider MBC chronic or on route to chronicisation, the medical professionals interviewed were uncertain as to whether MBC can be considered a chronic disease, and attempted to discuss chronicity through survival times, the kind of management possible for the disease, and how it compares to other conditions more commonly considered chronic. In some cases, the patients considered the idea of chronicity a source of hope or a way to link their condition to those of people with other diseases; however, they generally rejected the definition as inappropriate for their experience of the illness. Analysing the fluid uses of the concept of chronicity in the case of MBC contributes to the debate within medical anthropology on how medical categories acquire different values and uses and on the circulation of meanings between the biomedical context and the patient experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信