{"title":"探索设计和实施社会故事干预的最佳证据研究:一个批判性评估的主题","authors":"S. Johnston, Robyn Thompson, C. Blue, J. Reichle","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"23 1","pages":"218 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the best evidence research to design and implement social story interventions: A critically appraised topic\",\"authors\":\"S. Johnston, Robyn Thompson, C. Blue, J. Reichle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"218 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the best evidence research to design and implement social story interventions: A critically appraised topic
Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.