探索设计和实施社会故事干预的最佳证据研究:一个批判性评估的主题

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Johnston, Robyn Thompson, C. Blue, J. Reichle
{"title":"探索设计和实施社会故事干预的最佳证据研究:一个批判性评估的主题","authors":"S. Johnston, Robyn Thompson, C. Blue, J. Reichle","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"23 1","pages":"218 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the best evidence research to design and implement social story interventions: A critically appraised topic\",\"authors\":\"S. Johnston, Robyn Thompson, C. Blue, J. Reichle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"218 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2022.2044730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:批判性评价的主题(CAT)是一种快速的审查,对研究和实践特别有用。本CAT的目的是双重的,目的是(a)检查最佳证据社会故事(SS)干预研究的设计和实施的异同,以及(b)确定SS干预包中是否存在可能有助于提高有效性的经经验验证的共同干预策略。本CAT的证据表明,SS干预可以有效地增加期望的社会和学业行为,减少破坏性行为。此外,虽然发现了相似之处,但也注意到了SS干预措施的设计和实施方面的差异,并发现了SS干预措施包中嵌入的经验验证的干预策略可能有助于提高有效性。在设计和实施SS干预措施的变化进行了讨论,对实践和研究的影响。作者建议在2024年11月对该CAT进行更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the best evidence research to design and implement social story interventions: A critically appraised topic
Abstract A critically appraised topic (CAT) is a rapid review that can be particularly useful for informing research and practice. The purpose of this CAT was twofold and was conducted to (a) examine the similarities and differences in the design and implementation of best evidence social story (SS) intervention research, and (b) determine whether there are common empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may contribute to effectiveness. Evidence from this CAT suggests that SS interventions can effectively increase desired social and academic behaviors and decrease disruptive behaviors. Further, although similarities were identified, differences in the design and implementation of SS interventions were noted, and empirically validated intervention strategies embedded within SS intervention packages that may be contributing to effectiveness were detected. Variations in the design and implementation of SS interventions are discussed with regard to implications for practice and research. The authors propose an update to this CAT in November 2024.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信