使用社区开发的规范语言推进协调网络调查和工具互操作性。

Q1 Social Sciences
Eoghan Casey, Sean Barnum, Ryan Griffith, Jonathan Snyder, Harm van Beek, Alex Nelson
{"title":"使用社区开发的规范语言推进协调网络调查和工具互操作性。","authors":"Eoghan Casey, Sean Barnum, Ryan Griffith, Jonathan Snyder, Harm van Beek, Alex Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.diin.2017.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Any investigation can have a digital dimension, often involving information from multiple data sources, organizations and jurisdictions. Existing approaches to representing and exchanging cyber-investigation information are inadequate, particularly when combining data sources from numerous organizations or dealing with large amounts of data from various tools. To perform digital investigations effectively, there is a pressing need to harmonize how information relevant to cyber-investigations is represented and exchanged. This paper addresses this need for information exchange and tool interoperability with an open community-developed specification language called Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE). To further promote a common structure, CASE aligns with and extends the Unified Cyber Ontology (UCO) construct, which provides a format for representing information in all cyber domains. This ontology abstracts objects and concepts that are not CASE-specific, so that they can be used across other cyber disciplines that may extend UCO. This work is a rational evolution of the Digital Forensic Analysis eXpression (DFAX) for representing digital forensic information and provenance. CASE is more flexible than DFAX and can be utilized in any context, including criminal, corporate and intelligence. CASE also builds on the Hansken data model developed and implemented by the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI). CASE enables the fusion of information from different organizations, data sources, and forensic tools to foster more comprehensive and cohesive analysis. This paper includes illustrative examples of how CASE can be implemented and used to capture information in a structured form to advance sharing, interoperability and analysis in cyber-investigations. In addition to capturing technical details and relationships between objects, CASE provides structure for representing and sharing details about how cyber-information was handled, transferred, processed, analyzed, and interpreted. CASE also supports data marking for sharing information at different levels of trust and classification, as well as protection of sensitive and private information. Furthermore, CASE supports the sharing of knowledge related to cyber-investigations, including distinctive patterns of activity/behavior that are common across cases. This paper features a proof-of-concept implementation using the open source forensic framework named plaso to export data to CASE. Community members are encouraged to participate in the development and implementation of CASE and UCO.</p>","PeriodicalId":50578,"journal":{"name":"Digital Investigation","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Coordinated Cyber-investigations and Tool Interoperability using a Community Developed Specification Language.\",\"authors\":\"Eoghan Casey, Sean Barnum, Ryan Griffith, Jonathan Snyder, Harm van Beek, Alex Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diin.2017.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Any investigation can have a digital dimension, often involving information from multiple data sources, organizations and jurisdictions. Existing approaches to representing and exchanging cyber-investigation information are inadequate, particularly when combining data sources from numerous organizations or dealing with large amounts of data from various tools. To perform digital investigations effectively, there is a pressing need to harmonize how information relevant to cyber-investigations is represented and exchanged. This paper addresses this need for information exchange and tool interoperability with an open community-developed specification language called Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE). To further promote a common structure, CASE aligns with and extends the Unified Cyber Ontology (UCO) construct, which provides a format for representing information in all cyber domains. This ontology abstracts objects and concepts that are not CASE-specific, so that they can be used across other cyber disciplines that may extend UCO. This work is a rational evolution of the Digital Forensic Analysis eXpression (DFAX) for representing digital forensic information and provenance. CASE is more flexible than DFAX and can be utilized in any context, including criminal, corporate and intelligence. CASE also builds on the Hansken data model developed and implemented by the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI). CASE enables the fusion of information from different organizations, data sources, and forensic tools to foster more comprehensive and cohesive analysis. This paper includes illustrative examples of how CASE can be implemented and used to capture information in a structured form to advance sharing, interoperability and analysis in cyber-investigations. In addition to capturing technical details and relationships between objects, CASE provides structure for representing and sharing details about how cyber-information was handled, transferred, processed, analyzed, and interpreted. CASE also supports data marking for sharing information at different levels of trust and classification, as well as protection of sensitive and private information. Furthermore, CASE supports the sharing of knowledge related to cyber-investigations, including distinctive patterns of activity/behavior that are common across cases. This paper features a proof-of-concept implementation using the open source forensic framework named plaso to export data to CASE. Community members are encouraged to participate in the development and implementation of CASE and UCO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Investigation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6774392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

任何调查都可以具有数字维度,通常涉及来自多个数据源、组织和司法管辖区的信息。现有的表示和交换网络调查信息的方法是不够的,特别是在组合来自众多组织的数据源或处理来自各种工具的大量数据时。为了有效地进行数字调查,迫切需要协调与网络调查相关的信息如何表示和交换。本文通过一个开放的社区开发的规范语言——网络调查分析标准表达(CASE)来解决信息交换和工具互操作性的需求。为了进一步促进通用结构,CASE与统一网络本体(UCO)结构保持一致并对其进行了扩展,后者为所有网络领域中的信息提供了一种表示格式。这个本体抽象了不特定于案例的对象和概念,因此它们可以跨其他可能扩展UCO的网络学科使用。这项工作是数字法医分析表达式(DFAX)的合理演变,用于表示数字法医信息和来源。CASE比DFAX更灵活,可以在任何情况下使用,包括犯罪、企业和情报。CASE还建立在荷兰法医研究所(NFI)开发和实施的汉斯肯数据模型的基础上。CASE允许融合来自不同组织、数据源和取证工具的信息,以促进更全面和更有凝聚力的分析。本文包含了CASE如何实现和用于以结构化形式捕获信息的说明性示例,以推进网络调查中的共享、互操作性和分析。除了捕获技术细节和对象之间的关系之外,CASE还提供了表示和共享有关如何处理、传输、处理、分析和解释网络信息的细节的结构。CASE还支持数据标记,以便在不同的信任和分类级别上共享信息,以及保护敏感信息和私有信息。此外,CASE支持与网络调查相关的知识共享,包括跨案例常见的独特活动/行为模式。本文的特点是使用名为plaso的开源取证框架将数据导出到CASE的概念验证实现。鼓励社区成员参与CASE和UCO的发展和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Coordinated Cyber-investigations and Tool Interoperability using a Community Developed Specification Language.

Any investigation can have a digital dimension, often involving information from multiple data sources, organizations and jurisdictions. Existing approaches to representing and exchanging cyber-investigation information are inadequate, particularly when combining data sources from numerous organizations or dealing with large amounts of data from various tools. To perform digital investigations effectively, there is a pressing need to harmonize how information relevant to cyber-investigations is represented and exchanged. This paper addresses this need for information exchange and tool interoperability with an open community-developed specification language called Cyber-investigation Analysis Standard Expression (CASE). To further promote a common structure, CASE aligns with and extends the Unified Cyber Ontology (UCO) construct, which provides a format for representing information in all cyber domains. This ontology abstracts objects and concepts that are not CASE-specific, so that they can be used across other cyber disciplines that may extend UCO. This work is a rational evolution of the Digital Forensic Analysis eXpression (DFAX) for representing digital forensic information and provenance. CASE is more flexible than DFAX and can be utilized in any context, including criminal, corporate and intelligence. CASE also builds on the Hansken data model developed and implemented by the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI). CASE enables the fusion of information from different organizations, data sources, and forensic tools to foster more comprehensive and cohesive analysis. This paper includes illustrative examples of how CASE can be implemented and used to capture information in a structured form to advance sharing, interoperability and analysis in cyber-investigations. In addition to capturing technical details and relationships between objects, CASE provides structure for representing and sharing details about how cyber-information was handled, transferred, processed, analyzed, and interpreted. CASE also supports data marking for sharing information at different levels of trust and classification, as well as protection of sensitive and private information. Furthermore, CASE supports the sharing of knowledge related to cyber-investigations, including distinctive patterns of activity/behavior that are common across cases. This paper features a proof-of-concept implementation using the open source forensic framework named plaso to export data to CASE. Community members are encouraged to participate in the development and implementation of CASE and UCO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Investigation
Digital Investigation 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Digital Investigation is now continued as Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, advancing digital transformations in forensic science. FSI Digital Investigation covers a broad array of subjects related to crime and security throughout the computerized world. The primary pillar of this publication is digital evidence and multimedia, with the core qualities of provenance, integrity and authenticity. This publication promotes advances in investigating cybercrimes, cyberattacks and traditional crimes involving digital evidence, using scientific practices in digital investigations, and reducing the use of technology for criminal purposes. This widely referenced publication promotes innovations and advances in utilizing digital evidence and multimedia for legal purposes, including criminal justice, incident response, cybercrime analysis, cyber-risk management, civil and regulatory matters, and privacy protection. Relevant research areas include forensic science, computer science, data science, artificial intelligence, and smart technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信