Muhammad Fahmi Md Ramzan, M. Z. Abdul Rahman, Nurfarhana Mohd Daud
{"title":"Analisis Legitimasi Campur Tangan Kemanusiaan: Sorotan Terhadap Prinsip-Prinsip Asas Undang-Undang Antarabangsa","authors":"Muhammad Fahmi Md Ramzan, M. Z. Abdul Rahman, Nurfarhana Mohd Daud","doi":"10.22452/peradaban.vol15no1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention as an international doctrine that has often provoked debate among international legal thinkers. It is a controversial concept in international relations because considered violated the basic provisions and principles of international law enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations (UN), namely the principle of sovereignty, the principle of non-intervention and the principle of non-use of force. However, the results of the analysis found that humanitarian intervention is in fact not contrary to those basic principles and even has a strong enough legitimacy to be implement. Thus, this article attempts to reveal and refute the arguments put forward by critics regarding the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention by bringing a qualitative descriptive analysis along with textual interpretation to evaluate and interpret the relevant legal text in detail.","PeriodicalId":34326,"journal":{"name":"Nalar Jurnal Peradaban dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nalar Jurnal Peradaban dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/peradaban.vol15no1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了人道主义干预作为一种经常引起国际法律思想家争论的国际学说的合法性。它在国际关系中是一个有争议的概念,因为它违反了《联合国宪章》所载的国际法基本规定和原则,即主权原则、不干涉原则和不使用武力原则。然而,分析的结果发现,人道主义干预实际上并不违反这些基本原则,甚至有足够的合法性来实施。因此,本文试图通过定性的描述性分析和文本解释,对相关法律文本进行详细的评价和解释,从而揭示和反驳批评者对人道主义干预合法性的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Legitimasi Campur Tangan Kemanusiaan: Sorotan Terhadap Prinsip-Prinsip Asas Undang-Undang Antarabangsa
This article discusses the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention as an international doctrine that has often provoked debate among international legal thinkers. It is a controversial concept in international relations because considered violated the basic provisions and principles of international law enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations (UN), namely the principle of sovereignty, the principle of non-intervention and the principle of non-use of force. However, the results of the analysis found that humanitarian intervention is in fact not contrary to those basic principles and even has a strong enough legitimacy to be implement. Thus, this article attempts to reveal and refute the arguments put forward by critics regarding the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention by bringing a qualitative descriptive analysis along with textual interpretation to evaluate and interpret the relevant legal text in detail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信