重新思考护理:从实践到本体政治

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
F. G. Selgas, María Teresa Martín Palomo
{"title":"重新思考护理:从实践到本体政治","authors":"F. G. Selgas, María Teresa Martín Palomo","doi":"10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repensar los cuidados: de las prácticas a la ontopolítica\",\"authors\":\"F. G. Selgas, María Teresa Martín Palomo\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RIS.2021.79.3.20.68","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文是对大多数主要护理研究所遵循的课程的理论回顾,以及女权主义者对其中心地位的主张。我们认为,它到达了一个概念的护理作为复杂的社会实践过程,这是基本的主体性,社会共识和共同世界的延续。考虑到这种实践中的相互依赖,“护理伦理”和后人文主义观点的出现,我们能够在第二个运动中超越这个概念,将护理实践的特定逻辑描述为修补逻辑,并声称从这些伦理过渡到最终的“护理事项”本体,这不可避免地是政治性的,改变了我们对自己和我们在环境中的位置的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repensar los cuidados: de las prácticas a la ontopolítica
This paper is a theoretical review of the course followed by most of the main care researches, along with feminist claims of its centrality. We argue that it arrives at a concept of care as complex socio-practical processes which are fundamental for subjectivities, social consensus and the perpetuation of a common world. Thinking about interdependence in such practices, ‘ethics of care’ and the emergence of a post-humanist perspective, we are able to go, in a second movement, beyond that concept describing the specific logic of care practices as a tinkering logic and claiming for a transition from those ethics to an eventual ontology of “matters of care” which is inevitably political and changes our vision of ourselves and our placement in environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信