测量学生对学生评价教学(set)的反应及教师对干预前后学生评价教学的认知

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lisa Moralejo, Elizabeth Andersen, Norma Hilsmann, L. Kennedy
{"title":"测量学生对学生评价教学(set)的反应及教师对干预前后学生评价教学的认知","authors":"Lisa Moralejo, Elizabeth Andersen, Norma Hilsmann, L. Kennedy","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.8052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At most colleges and universities, students are invited to complete Student Evaluation of Teaching (SETs), which have both formative and summative purposes. In this convergent mixed methods study we evaluated if we could influence (a) students’ numerical responses and nature of their comments and (b) instructors’ physical and emotional responses to SET results, their perceptions of their results, and perceptions of SETs overall. Students who received an in-class intervention submitted more qualified comments, addressed specific issues, and made more recommendations for improvements compared to students who did not receive the intervention. Instructors reported reduced physical symptoms related to SETs after they received the intervention. Instructors reported that the intervention helped them let go of feelings of frustration and isolation and that they had acquired new strategies for opening, reading, and interpreting SET results. They continued, however, to report feeling apprehensive, uneasy, and uncertain about impending SET results.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Student Responses in and Instructors’ Perceptions of Student Evaluation Teaching (SETs), Pre and Post Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Moralejo, Elizabeth Andersen, Norma Hilsmann, L. Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.8052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At most colleges and universities, students are invited to complete Student Evaluation of Teaching (SETs), which have both formative and summative purposes. In this convergent mixed methods study we evaluated if we could influence (a) students’ numerical responses and nature of their comments and (b) instructors’ physical and emotional responses to SET results, their perceptions of their results, and perceptions of SETs overall. Students who received an in-class intervention submitted more qualified comments, addressed specific issues, and made more recommendations for improvements compared to students who did not receive the intervention. Instructors reported reduced physical symptoms related to SETs after they received the intervention. Instructors reported that the intervention helped them let go of feelings of frustration and isolation and that they had acquired new strategies for opening, reading, and interpreting SET results. They continued, however, to report feeling apprehensive, uneasy, and uncertain about impending SET results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.8052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.3.8052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在大多数学院和大学,学生都被邀请完成学生教学评估(set),这既有形成性的目的,也有总结性的目的。在这个融合的混合方法研究中,我们评估了我们是否可以影响(a)学生的数字反应和他们评论的性质,(b)教师对SET结果的身体和情感反应,他们对结果的看法,以及对SET整体的看法。与没有接受课堂干预的学生相比,接受课堂干预的学生提交了更多合格的评论,解决了具体问题,并提出了更多改进建议。教师报告说,在接受干预后,与set相关的身体症状有所减轻。教师们报告说,干预帮助他们摆脱了沮丧和孤立的感觉,他们掌握了打开、阅读和解释SET结果的新策略。然而,他们继续报告对即将到来的SET结果感到忧虑、不安和不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Student Responses in and Instructors’ Perceptions of Student Evaluation Teaching (SETs), Pre and Post Intervention
At most colleges and universities, students are invited to complete Student Evaluation of Teaching (SETs), which have both formative and summative purposes. In this convergent mixed methods study we evaluated if we could influence (a) students’ numerical responses and nature of their comments and (b) instructors’ physical and emotional responses to SET results, their perceptions of their results, and perceptions of SETs overall. Students who received an in-class intervention submitted more qualified comments, addressed specific issues, and made more recommendations for improvements compared to students who did not receive the intervention. Instructors reported reduced physical symptoms related to SETs after they received the intervention. Instructors reported that the intervention helped them let go of feelings of frustration and isolation and that they had acquired new strategies for opening, reading, and interpreting SET results. They continued, however, to report feeling apprehensive, uneasy, and uncertain about impending SET results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信