医疗补助管理医疗处方使用和成本节约。

T. Shireman, R. Hornung, M. Ho, C. Moomaw, R. Jang
{"title":"医疗补助管理医疗处方使用和成本节约。","authors":"T. Shireman, R. Hornung, M. Ho, C. Moomaw, R. Jang","doi":"10.1331/108658002763029562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the impact of Medicaid managed care (MC) enrollment on prescription use and costs.\n\n\nDESIGN\nRetrospective, cross-sectional analysis of claims submitted over a 6-month period.\n\n\nSETTING\nOhio Medicaid.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS\nStratified, random selection of 2,932 MC and 1,335 fee-for-service (FFS) recipients.\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\nDependent variables were the probability of any prescription use and 6-month prescription counts and costs. Independent variables included age, plan enrollment (MC or FFS), county enrollment status (mandatory or voluntary), presence of a chronic comorbidity, and any outpatient medical visit.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter adjusting for comorbidities and outpatient medical visits, plan enrollment effects depended on age. FFS enrollees 8 to 12 and 12 to 18 years old were less likely (adjusted odds ratios 0.56 and 0.58, respectively) to receive a prescription, while enrollees over 30 years of age were 2.98 times more likely to receive a prescription. Among prescription users, level of use and costs were consistent across all ages for MC enrollees. FFS enrollees had 25% to 218% higher levels of prescription use than MC enrollees, depending on age. Prescription costs were 8% lower for FFS enrollees ages 4 to 8 but higher for all enrollees in other age groups (range, 22% to 311% higher).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPrescription use and costs were lower for Medicaid MC enrollees than they were for patients in traditional FFS plans. Further research is needed to examine the quality of care for both FFS and MC enrollees.","PeriodicalId":17212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association","volume":"77 1","pages":"587-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid managed care prescription use and cost savings.\",\"authors\":\"T. Shireman, R. Hornung, M. Ho, C. Moomaw, R. Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1331/108658002763029562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo evaluate the impact of Medicaid managed care (MC) enrollment on prescription use and costs.\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nRetrospective, cross-sectional analysis of claims submitted over a 6-month period.\\n\\n\\nSETTING\\nOhio Medicaid.\\n\\n\\nPATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS\\nStratified, random selection of 2,932 MC and 1,335 fee-for-service (FFS) recipients.\\n\\n\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\nDependent variables were the probability of any prescription use and 6-month prescription counts and costs. Independent variables included age, plan enrollment (MC or FFS), county enrollment status (mandatory or voluntary), presence of a chronic comorbidity, and any outpatient medical visit.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAfter adjusting for comorbidities and outpatient medical visits, plan enrollment effects depended on age. FFS enrollees 8 to 12 and 12 to 18 years old were less likely (adjusted odds ratios 0.56 and 0.58, respectively) to receive a prescription, while enrollees over 30 years of age were 2.98 times more likely to receive a prescription. Among prescription users, level of use and costs were consistent across all ages for MC enrollees. FFS enrollees had 25% to 218% higher levels of prescription use than MC enrollees, depending on age. Prescription costs were 8% lower for FFS enrollees ages 4 to 8 but higher for all enrollees in other age groups (range, 22% to 311% higher).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nPrescription use and costs were lower for Medicaid MC enrollees than they were for patients in traditional FFS plans. Further research is needed to examine the quality of care for both FFS and MC enrollees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"587-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1331/108658002763029562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1331/108658002763029562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的评价医疗补助管理医疗(MC)入组对处方使用和成本的影响。设计对6个月期间提交的索赔进行回顾性、横断面分析。SETTINGOhio医疗补助。患者和其他参与者分层,随机选择2,932名MC和1,335名服务收费(FFS)接受者。主要结局指标:因变量为任何处方使用的概率和6个月的处方计数和费用。独立变量包括年龄、计划登记(MC或FFS)、县登记状况(强制或自愿)、是否存在慢性合并症以及任何门诊就诊。结果调整合并症和门诊就诊后,计划入组效果与年龄有关。8至12岁和12至18岁的FFS参保者获得处方的可能性较低(调整后的比值比分别为0.56和0.58),而30岁以上的参保者获得处方的可能性是其2.98倍。在处方使用者中,MC参保者的使用水平和费用在所有年龄段都是一致的。根据年龄的不同,FFS参保者的处方使用率比MC参保者高25%至218%。4至8岁FFS参保者的处方费用降低了8%,但其他年龄组所有参保者的处方费用较高(范围,高出22%至311%)。结论医疗补助MC计划参保者的处方使用和费用低于传统FFS计划参保者。需要进一步的研究来检查FFS和MC注册者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicaid managed care prescription use and cost savings.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of Medicaid managed care (MC) enrollment on prescription use and costs. DESIGN Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of claims submitted over a 6-month period. SETTING Ohio Medicaid. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS Stratified, random selection of 2,932 MC and 1,335 fee-for-service (FFS) recipients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Dependent variables were the probability of any prescription use and 6-month prescription counts and costs. Independent variables included age, plan enrollment (MC or FFS), county enrollment status (mandatory or voluntary), presence of a chronic comorbidity, and any outpatient medical visit. RESULTS After adjusting for comorbidities and outpatient medical visits, plan enrollment effects depended on age. FFS enrollees 8 to 12 and 12 to 18 years old were less likely (adjusted odds ratios 0.56 and 0.58, respectively) to receive a prescription, while enrollees over 30 years of age were 2.98 times more likely to receive a prescription. Among prescription users, level of use and costs were consistent across all ages for MC enrollees. FFS enrollees had 25% to 218% higher levels of prescription use than MC enrollees, depending on age. Prescription costs were 8% lower for FFS enrollees ages 4 to 8 but higher for all enrollees in other age groups (range, 22% to 311% higher). CONCLUSION Prescription use and costs were lower for Medicaid MC enrollees than they were for patients in traditional FFS plans. Further research is needed to examine the quality of care for both FFS and MC enrollees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信