Bootstrap-DEA管理效率与银行倒闭早期预测:来自2008-2009年美国银行倒闭的证据

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Abdus Samad, Vaughn S. Armstrong
{"title":"Bootstrap-DEA管理效率与银行倒闭早期预测:来自2008-2009年美国银行倒闭的证据","authors":"Abdus Samad,&nbsp;Vaughn S. Armstrong","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines prediction of U.S. bank failure with a probit model that uses bias-corrected technical efficiency estimated using bootstrap data envelopment analysis as the measure of management quality. The model is tested on a sample of failed and non-failed banks during the sub-prime mortgage meltdown, 2008–2009. Results demonstrate this measure of management efficiency, together with other CAMEL factors (i.e., capital adequacy, asset quality, earnings quality, and liquidity), is significant for predicting bank failure. This measure of managerial quality allows more accurate prediction of failure than other measures. The model successfully predicts bank failure one and two years prior to failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070122000208/pdfft?md5=cb3751c2643b09199abbd9189fb1f1ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1303070122000208-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bootstrap-DEA management efficiency and early prediction of bank failure: Evidence from 2008-2009 U.S. bank failures\",\"authors\":\"Abdus Samad,&nbsp;Vaughn S. Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines prediction of U.S. bank failure with a probit model that uses bias-corrected technical efficiency estimated using bootstrap data envelopment analysis as the measure of management quality. The model is tested on a sample of failed and non-failed banks during the sub-prime mortgage meltdown, 2008–2009. Results demonstrate this measure of management efficiency, together with other CAMEL factors (i.e., capital adequacy, asset quality, earnings quality, and liquidity), is significant for predicting bank failure. This measure of managerial quality allows more accurate prediction of failure than other measures. The model successfully predicts bank failure one and two years prior to failure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Bank Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070122000208/pdfft?md5=cb3751c2643b09199abbd9189fb1f1ec&pid=1-s2.0-S1303070122000208-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Bank Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070122000208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1303070122000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文用一个probit模型来检验美国银行倒闭的预测,该模型使用自举数据包络分析来估计偏差校正的技术效率,作为管理质量的衡量标准。该模型在2008-2009年次贷危机期间破产和未破产银行的样本上进行了测试。结果表明,这种管理效率的衡量标准,连同其他CAMEL因素(即资本充足率、资产质量、盈余质量和流动性),对于预测银行倒闭具有重要意义。这种管理质量的度量比其他度量更能准确地预测失败。该模型成功地预测了银行倒闭前一年和两年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bootstrap-DEA management efficiency and early prediction of bank failure: Evidence from 2008-2009 U.S. bank failures

This paper examines prediction of U.S. bank failure with a probit model that uses bias-corrected technical efficiency estimated using bootstrap data envelopment analysis as the measure of management quality. The model is tested on a sample of failed and non-failed banks during the sub-prime mortgage meltdown, 2008–2009. Results demonstrate this measure of management efficiency, together with other CAMEL factors (i.e., capital adequacy, asset quality, earnings quality, and liquidity), is significant for predicting bank failure. This measure of managerial quality allows more accurate prediction of failure than other measures. The model successfully predicts bank failure one and two years prior to failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信