学校体育学习的实施:现实与伤害

Ali Satia Graha, Sumaryanto Sumaryanto, Sumaryanti Sumaryanti, N. Arovah, Rizki Mulyawan
{"title":"学校体育学习的实施:现实与伤害","authors":"Ali Satia Graha, Sumaryanto Sumaryanto, Sumaryanti Sumaryanti, N. Arovah, Rizki Mulyawan","doi":"10.21831/cp.v42i2.53754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good sport learning planning could minimize injury risk in sports learning. The study aimed at finding out the preparation process of sport learning planning and the number of injury cases. It used a cross-sectional design with a quantitative approach. It was conducted in April-October 2022 at junior high schools in the Special District of Yogyakarta. Its samples were drawn from 20,401 students and 33 physical, sports, and health education teachers using a random sampling technique that gave 400 samples (171 males and 229 females). The validity test of the student questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.235) and alpha Cronbach of 0.928 0.655, while the validity test of the teacher questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.344) and alpha Cronbach of 0.737 0.655. Results: There were 158 students (39.50%) who got cervical vertebrae injuries, 193 students (48.25%) who got shoulder injuries, 133 students (33.25%) who got elbow injuries, 182 students (45.50%) who got wrist injuries, 163 students (40.75%) who got finger injury, 198 students (49.50%) who got waist injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got pelvis injury, 202 students (50.50%) who got knee injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got ankle injury, and 165 students (41.25%) who got toe injury. Concerning sports learning planning, there were 2 teachers (6.1%) who never planned sports learning, 8 teachers (24.2%) who rarely planned it, 13 teachers (39.4%) who occasionally planned it, 9 teachers (27.3%) who often planned, and 1 teacher (3.0%) who always planned it. Conclusion: Knee injury was the most common one and teachers have not well-planned sport learning. It was necessary to conduct further study of the correlation between sports learning planning and the injury","PeriodicalId":17767,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of sport learning at school: Reality and Injury\",\"authors\":\"Ali Satia Graha, Sumaryanto Sumaryanto, Sumaryanti Sumaryanti, N. Arovah, Rizki Mulyawan\",\"doi\":\"10.21831/cp.v42i2.53754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A good sport learning planning could minimize injury risk in sports learning. The study aimed at finding out the preparation process of sport learning planning and the number of injury cases. It used a cross-sectional design with a quantitative approach. It was conducted in April-October 2022 at junior high schools in the Special District of Yogyakarta. Its samples were drawn from 20,401 students and 33 physical, sports, and health education teachers using a random sampling technique that gave 400 samples (171 males and 229 females). The validity test of the student questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.235) and alpha Cronbach of 0.928 0.655, while the validity test of the teacher questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.344) and alpha Cronbach of 0.737 0.655. Results: There were 158 students (39.50%) who got cervical vertebrae injuries, 193 students (48.25%) who got shoulder injuries, 133 students (33.25%) who got elbow injuries, 182 students (45.50%) who got wrist injuries, 163 students (40.75%) who got finger injury, 198 students (49.50%) who got waist injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got pelvis injury, 202 students (50.50%) who got knee injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got ankle injury, and 165 students (41.25%) who got toe injury. Concerning sports learning planning, there were 2 teachers (6.1%) who never planned sports learning, 8 teachers (24.2%) who rarely planned it, 13 teachers (39.4%) who occasionally planned it, 9 teachers (27.3%) who often planned, and 1 teacher (3.0%) who always planned it. Conclusion: Knee injury was the most common one and teachers have not well-planned sport learning. It was necessary to conduct further study of the correlation between sports learning planning and the injury\",\"PeriodicalId\":17767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.53754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.53754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

良好的运动学习计划可以降低运动学习中受伤的风险。本研究旨在了解运动学习计划的准备过程及受伤个案的数目。它采用了定量方法的横断面设计。该调查于2022年4月至10月在日惹特区的初中进行。该研究采用随机抽样技术,从20401名学生和33名体育、运动和健康教育教师中抽取了400个样本(171名男性和229名女性)。学生问卷效度检验的r-count r-table为0.235,alpha Cronbach为0.928 0.655;教师问卷效度检验的r-count r-table为0.344,alpha Cronbach为0.737 0.655。结果:颈椎损伤158人(39.50%),肩部损伤193人(48.25%),肘部损伤133人(33.25%),腕部损伤182人(45.50%),手指损伤163人(40.75%),腰部损伤198人(49.50%),骨盆损伤170人(42.50%),膝关节损伤202人(50.50%),踝关节损伤170人(42.50%),足趾损伤165人(41.25%)。在体育学习计划方面,从不计划体育学习的教师有2人(6.1%),很少计划体育学习的教师有8人(24.2%),偶尔计划体育学习的教师有13人(39.4%),经常计划体育学习的教师有9人(27.3%),总是计划体育学习的教师有1人(3.0%)。结论:膝关节损伤是最常见的损伤,教师对运动学习的规划不完善。因此,有必要进一步研究运动学习计划与损伤之间的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The implementation of sport learning at school: Reality and Injury
A good sport learning planning could minimize injury risk in sports learning. The study aimed at finding out the preparation process of sport learning planning and the number of injury cases. It used a cross-sectional design with a quantitative approach. It was conducted in April-October 2022 at junior high schools in the Special District of Yogyakarta. Its samples were drawn from 20,401 students and 33 physical, sports, and health education teachers using a random sampling technique that gave 400 samples (171 males and 229 females). The validity test of the student questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.235) and alpha Cronbach of 0.928 0.655, while the validity test of the teacher questionnaire gave r-count r-table (0.344) and alpha Cronbach of 0.737 0.655. Results: There were 158 students (39.50%) who got cervical vertebrae injuries, 193 students (48.25%) who got shoulder injuries, 133 students (33.25%) who got elbow injuries, 182 students (45.50%) who got wrist injuries, 163 students (40.75%) who got finger injury, 198 students (49.50%) who got waist injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got pelvis injury, 202 students (50.50%) who got knee injury, 170 students (42.50%) who got ankle injury, and 165 students (41.25%) who got toe injury. Concerning sports learning planning, there were 2 teachers (6.1%) who never planned sports learning, 8 teachers (24.2%) who rarely planned it, 13 teachers (39.4%) who occasionally planned it, 9 teachers (27.3%) who often planned, and 1 teacher (3.0%) who always planned it. Conclusion: Knee injury was the most common one and teachers have not well-planned sport learning. It was necessary to conduct further study of the correlation between sports learning planning and the injury
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信