P. Andrade, Fábio Salerno Rinaldi, Igor Ribeiro de Castro Bienert, Robson Alves Barbosa, Marcos Henriques Bergonso, Milena Paiva Brasil de Matos, Maycon Soto Simplício, Ederlon Ferreira Nogueira, V. Esteves, Sérgio Kreimer, Marden André Tebet, L. A. Mattos, André Labrunie
{"title":"失败的径向中心技术与大量的程序","authors":"P. Andrade, Fábio Salerno Rinaldi, Igor Ribeiro de Castro Bienert, Robson Alves Barbosa, Marcos Henriques Bergonso, Milena Paiva Brasil de Matos, Maycon Soto Simplício, Ederlon Ferreira Nogueira, V. Esteves, Sérgio Kreimer, Marden André Tebet, L. A. Mattos, André Labrunie","doi":"10.1590/0104-1843000000055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure of the Transradial Approach in a High-Volume Center background: The mechanisms and predictors of failed transradial approach in centers dedicated to this technique are not well characterized and were the main objective of this analysis. methods: 6,808 consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures by operators with utilization rate greater than 90% were included. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of failed transradial approach. Results: Transradial failure rate was 1.7%. Vascular complications were observed in 5%, with a prevalence of asymptomatic arterial occlusion and subcutaneous hematomas. Predictors of failure were female gender (OR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.29-2.71; p = 0.01), age > 70 years (OR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.06-2.98; p = 0.03) and presence of chronic peripheral arterial disease (OR = 5.71; 95% CI 2.40-13.54; p < 0.01). Conclusions: In a high-volume radial center, failure rate was < 2% and variables associated with technical failure were female gender, advanced age and peripheral arterial disease. DesCRIPToRs: Radial artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention. Hemorrhage. Ischemia.","PeriodicalId":101093,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","volume":"71 1","pages":"333-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insucesso da Técnica Radial em Centro com Alto Volume de Procedimentos\",\"authors\":\"P. Andrade, Fábio Salerno Rinaldi, Igor Ribeiro de Castro Bienert, Robson Alves Barbosa, Marcos Henriques Bergonso, Milena Paiva Brasil de Matos, Maycon Soto Simplício, Ederlon Ferreira Nogueira, V. Esteves, Sérgio Kreimer, Marden André Tebet, L. A. Mattos, André Labrunie\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0104-1843000000055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Failure of the Transradial Approach in a High-Volume Center background: The mechanisms and predictors of failed transradial approach in centers dedicated to this technique are not well characterized and were the main objective of this analysis. methods: 6,808 consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures by operators with utilization rate greater than 90% were included. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of failed transradial approach. Results: Transradial failure rate was 1.7%. Vascular complications were observed in 5%, with a prevalence of asymptomatic arterial occlusion and subcutaneous hematomas. Predictors of failure were female gender (OR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.29-2.71; p = 0.01), age > 70 years (OR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.06-2.98; p = 0.03) and presence of chronic peripheral arterial disease (OR = 5.71; 95% CI 2.40-13.54; p < 0.01). Conclusions: In a high-volume radial center, failure rate was < 2% and variables associated with technical failure were female gender, advanced age and peripheral arterial disease. DesCRIPToRs: Radial artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention. Hemorrhage. Ischemia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"333-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1843000000055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1843000000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在大容量中心背景下,经桡骨入路的失败:在专门采用该技术的中心,经桡骨入路失败的机制和预测因素尚未得到很好的表征,这是本分析的主要目的。方法:连续6808例经桡动脉冠状动脉手术患者,手术使用率大于90%。使用简单和多元逻辑回归模型来确定失败的预测因素。结果:经桡动脉失败率为1.7%。血管并发症发生率为5%,伴有无症状动脉闭塞和皮下血肿。失败的预测因素为女性(OR = 1.87;95% ci 1.29-2.71;p = 0.01),年龄> 70岁(OR = 1.78;95% ci 1.06-2.98;p = 0.03)和存在慢性外周动脉疾病(OR = 5.71;95% ci 2.40-13.54;P < 0.01)。结论:在大容量放射状中心,失败率< 2%,与技术失败相关的变量为女性、高龄和外周动脉疾病。描述:桡动脉。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。出血。缺血。
Insucesso da Técnica Radial em Centro com Alto Volume de Procedimentos
Failure of the Transradial Approach in a High-Volume Center background: The mechanisms and predictors of failed transradial approach in centers dedicated to this technique are not well characterized and were the main objective of this analysis. methods: 6,808 consecutive patients undergoing transradial coronary procedures by operators with utilization rate greater than 90% were included. Simple and multiple logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of failed transradial approach. Results: Transradial failure rate was 1.7%. Vascular complications were observed in 5%, with a prevalence of asymptomatic arterial occlusion and subcutaneous hematomas. Predictors of failure were female gender (OR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.29-2.71; p = 0.01), age > 70 years (OR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.06-2.98; p = 0.03) and presence of chronic peripheral arterial disease (OR = 5.71; 95% CI 2.40-13.54; p < 0.01). Conclusions: In a high-volume radial center, failure rate was < 2% and variables associated with technical failure were female gender, advanced age and peripheral arterial disease. DesCRIPToRs: Radial artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention. Hemorrhage. Ischemia.