{"title":"无选择的大基数和集合论的潜能论","authors":"Raffaella Cutolo, Joel David Hamkins","doi":"10.1002/malq.202000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We define a <i>potentialist system</i> of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-structures, i.e., a collection of <i>possible worlds</i> in the language of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> connected by a binary <i>accessibility relation</i>, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe <i>V</i>. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>S</mi>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>.</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {S4.2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>S</mi>\n <mn>5</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {S5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, both for assertions in the language of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and for assertions in the full potentialist language.</p>","PeriodicalId":49864,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Logic Quarterly","volume":"68 4","pages":"409-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choiceless large cardinals and set-theoretic potentialism\",\"authors\":\"Raffaella Cutolo, Joel David Hamkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/malq.202000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We define a <i>potentialist system</i> of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-structures, i.e., a collection of <i>possible worlds</i> in the language of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> connected by a binary <i>accessibility relation</i>, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe <i>V</i>. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>.</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {S4.2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n <mn>5</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {S5}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, both for assertions in the language of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and for assertions in the full potentialist language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Logic Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"409-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Logic Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Logic Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Choiceless large cardinals and set-theoretic potentialism
We define a potentialist system of -structures, i.e., a collection of possible worlds in the language of connected by a binary accessibility relation, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe V. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just . It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory . Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory , both for assertions in the language of and for assertions in the full potentialist language.
期刊介绍:
Mathematical Logic Quarterly publishes original contributions on mathematical logic and foundations of mathematics and related areas, such as general logic, model theory, recursion theory, set theory, proof theory and constructive mathematics, algebraic logic, nonstandard models, and logical aspects of theoretical computer science.