{"title":"无选择的大基数和集合论的潜能论","authors":"Raffaella Cutolo, Joel David Hamkins","doi":"10.1002/malq.202000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We define a <i>potentialist system</i> of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-structures, i.e., a collection of <i>possible worlds</i> in the language of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> connected by a binary <i>accessibility relation</i>, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe <i>V</i>. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>S</mi>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>.</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {S4.2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>S</mi>\n <mn>5</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {S5}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, both for assertions in the language of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and for assertions in the full potentialist language.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choiceless large cardinals and set-theoretic potentialism\",\"authors\":\"Raffaella Cutolo, Joel David Hamkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/malq.202000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We define a <i>potentialist system</i> of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>-structures, i.e., a collection of <i>possible worlds</i> in the language of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> connected by a binary <i>accessibility relation</i>, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe <i>V</i>. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>.</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {S4.2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>S</mi>\\n <mn>5</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {S5}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, both for assertions in the language of <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mi>ZF</mi>\\n <annotation>$\\\\mathsf {ZF}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and for assertions in the full potentialist language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Choiceless large cardinals and set-theoretic potentialism
We define a potentialist system of -structures, i.e., a collection of possible worlds in the language of connected by a binary accessibility relation, achieving a potentialist account of the full background set-theoretic universe V. The definition involves Berkeley cardinals, the strongest known large cardinal axioms, inconsistent with the Axiom of Choice. In fact, as background theory we assume just . It turns out that the propositional modal assertions which are valid at every world of our system are exactly those in the modal theory . Moreover, we characterize the worlds satisfying the potentialist maximality principle, and thus the modal theory , both for assertions in the language of and for assertions in the full potentialist language.