口腔内膜与四种影像板系统在龋齿放射诊断中的体外比较

S. Yalcinkaya, A. Künzel, J. Becker
{"title":"口腔内膜与四种影像板系统在龋齿放射诊断中的体外比较","authors":"S. Yalcinkaya, A. Künzel, J. Becker","doi":"10.5455/MUSBED.20121231011629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In vitro comparison of intraoral films and four image plate systems in radiographic caries diagnosis Objectives: Detecting early caries lesion on a radiograph may be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to compare four image plate and two film-based systems by evaluating the accuracy of caries detection under standard conditions. Methods: Two hundred teeth were attached in groups of five onto plastic Lego®blocks. Radiographs were taken from each block under standard bitewing conditions with an X-ray device. Phosphor plates (Dentsply DenOptics®, Durr Vistascan II®, Soredex Digora FMX®, Soredex Digora Optime®) were exposed at 60 kV and 7 mA. The caries depths were analyzed by eleven observers and microscopic investigation was used to compare the histological findings. The caries depth was calculated as the difference between microscopic and radiological findings. Results: Data analysis showed a small impact of different sensors on the diagnostic accuracy. The largest differences between microscopic and radiographic caries ratings were found with DenOptix and Digora FMX. When it was calculated over all surfaces no statistical significance was found.","PeriodicalId":16169,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Comparison of Intraoral Films and Four Image Plate Systems in Radiographic Caries Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"S. Yalcinkaya, A. Künzel, J. Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/MUSBED.20121231011629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In vitro comparison of intraoral films and four image plate systems in radiographic caries diagnosis Objectives: Detecting early caries lesion on a radiograph may be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to compare four image plate and two film-based systems by evaluating the accuracy of caries detection under standard conditions. Methods: Two hundred teeth were attached in groups of five onto plastic Lego®blocks. Radiographs were taken from each block under standard bitewing conditions with an X-ray device. Phosphor plates (Dentsply DenOptics®, Durr Vistascan II®, Soredex Digora FMX®, Soredex Digora Optime®) were exposed at 60 kV and 7 mA. The caries depths were analyzed by eleven observers and microscopic investigation was used to compare the histological findings. The caries depth was calculated as the difference between microscopic and radiological findings. Results: Data analysis showed a small impact of different sensors on the diagnostic accuracy. The largest differences between microscopic and radiographic caries ratings were found with DenOptix and Digora FMX. When it was calculated over all surfaces no statistical significance was found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"175-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/MUSBED.20121231011629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/MUSBED.20121231011629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在x线片上发现早期龋齿病变可能是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的目的是比较四种图像板和两种基于薄膜的系统在标准条件下检测龋的准确性。方法:将200颗牙齿5组固定在塑料乐高积木上。在标准咬翼条件下,用x射线设备从每个块上拍摄x线片。荧光板(Dentsply DenOptics®,Durr Vistascan II®,Soredex Digora FMX®,Soredex Digora Optime®)在60 kV和7 mA下暴露。由11名观察员分析龋深,并用显微镜检查比较组织学结果。龋齿深度是通过显微镜和放射学检查结果的差异来计算的。结果:数据分析显示,不同传感器对诊断准确率的影响较小。显微镜和x线摄影的龋病分级差异最大的是DenOptix和Digora FMX。当对所有表面进行计算时,没有发现统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Comparison of Intraoral Films and Four Image Plate Systems in Radiographic Caries Diagnosis
ABSTRACT In vitro comparison of intraoral films and four image plate systems in radiographic caries diagnosis Objectives: Detecting early caries lesion on a radiograph may be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to compare four image plate and two film-based systems by evaluating the accuracy of caries detection under standard conditions. Methods: Two hundred teeth were attached in groups of five onto plastic Lego®blocks. Radiographs were taken from each block under standard bitewing conditions with an X-ray device. Phosphor plates (Dentsply DenOptics®, Durr Vistascan II®, Soredex Digora FMX®, Soredex Digora Optime®) were exposed at 60 kV and 7 mA. The caries depths were analyzed by eleven observers and microscopic investigation was used to compare the histological findings. The caries depth was calculated as the difference between microscopic and radiological findings. Results: Data analysis showed a small impact of different sensors on the diagnostic accuracy. The largest differences between microscopic and radiographic caries ratings were found with DenOptix and Digora FMX. When it was calculated over all surfaces no statistical significance was found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信