分离鸡蛋白与牛肉蛋白在健康活动成人体内的药动学评价

S. Hewlings
{"title":"分离鸡蛋白与牛肉蛋白在健康活动成人体内的药动学评价","authors":"S. Hewlings","doi":"10.24966/FSN-1076/100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-quality proteins of various sources stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS); however, less is known about the comparative bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of typical dietary proteins. This was a prospective, randomized, pharmacokinetic, exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the amino acid bioavailability of chicken protein isolate [Chik│Pro™ (CKP)] compared to Beef Protein Isolate (BFP). Twenty-two participants were randomized to receive both proteins in a cross-over design. Participants fasted overnight for at least eight hours and in a single blind fashion consumed 25 grams protein of CKP or BFP on day 4. Venous blood samples were collected for Total Amino Acid (TAA), Essential Amino Acid (EAA), Sulfur-containing Amino Acid (SAA), leucine, and arginine analysis one hour prior to ingestion (pre-in- gestion) and post-ingestion at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes. Statistical analyses were performed with paired t-tests, ANOVA, and the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test (p<0.05). Pharmacokinetic analysis was determined by mixed-model effects ANOVA. CKP produced significant increases in TAA, EAA, SAA, arginine and leucine concen - trations at 30 through 180 minutes (C30 min-C180 min) following ingestion, while BFP was only capable of this for arginine (p<0.05). Furthermore, these increases were shown to be significantly greater for CKP (p<0.05). The Maximum Concentration (Cmax), Area Under the Curve (AUC0-t), and Time of Delivery (Tmax) for EAA and leucine were significantly greater for CKP compared to BFP (p<0.05). For SAA, the CKP Cmax and AUC0-t for arginine was significantly greater than BFP (p<0.05). CKP was found to be superior to BFP in relative bioavailability for EAA, SAA, and leucine suggesting it may stimulate MPS and enhance recovery more effectively than BFP.","PeriodicalId":12403,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Nutrition","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Isolated Chicken Protein as Compared to Beef Protein in Healthy Active Adults\",\"authors\":\"S. Hewlings\",\"doi\":\"10.24966/FSN-1076/100037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High-quality proteins of various sources stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS); however, less is known about the comparative bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of typical dietary proteins. This was a prospective, randomized, pharmacokinetic, exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the amino acid bioavailability of chicken protein isolate [Chik│Pro™ (CKP)] compared to Beef Protein Isolate (BFP). Twenty-two participants were randomized to receive both proteins in a cross-over design. Participants fasted overnight for at least eight hours and in a single blind fashion consumed 25 grams protein of CKP or BFP on day 4. Venous blood samples were collected for Total Amino Acid (TAA), Essential Amino Acid (EAA), Sulfur-containing Amino Acid (SAA), leucine, and arginine analysis one hour prior to ingestion (pre-in- gestion) and post-ingestion at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes. Statistical analyses were performed with paired t-tests, ANOVA, and the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test (p<0.05). Pharmacokinetic analysis was determined by mixed-model effects ANOVA. CKP produced significant increases in TAA, EAA, SAA, arginine and leucine concen - trations at 30 through 180 minutes (C30 min-C180 min) following ingestion, while BFP was only capable of this for arginine (p<0.05). Furthermore, these increases were shown to be significantly greater for CKP (p<0.05). The Maximum Concentration (Cmax), Area Under the Curve (AUC0-t), and Time of Delivery (Tmax) for EAA and leucine were significantly greater for CKP compared to BFP (p<0.05). For SAA, the CKP Cmax and AUC0-t for arginine was significantly greater than BFP (p<0.05). CKP was found to be superior to BFP in relative bioavailability for EAA, SAA, and leucine suggesting it may stimulate MPS and enhance recovery more effectively than BFP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24966/FSN-1076/100037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/FSN-1076/100037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种来源的高品质蛋白质刺激肌肉蛋白合成(MPS);然而,对典型膳食蛋白质的比较生物利用度和药代动力学(PK)知之甚少。这是一项前瞻性、随机、药代动力学、探索性临床试验,旨在评估鸡分离蛋白[Chik│Pro™(CKP)]与牛肉分离蛋白(BFP)的氨基酸生物利用度。22名参与者在交叉设计中随机接受两种蛋白质。参与者禁食至少8小时,并在第4天以单盲方式摄入25克CKP或BFP蛋白质。分别于服药前1小时(服药前)和服药后30、60、90、120和180分钟采集静脉血进行总氨基酸(TAA)、必需氨基酸(EAA)、含硫氨基酸(SAA)、亮氨酸和精氨酸分析。统计学分析采用配对t检验、方差分析和Wilcoxon’s sign -rank检验(p<0.05)。药代动力学分析采用混合模型效应方差分析。CKP在摄入后30 ~ 180分钟(C30 min ~ c180 min)显著提高了TAA、EAA、SAA、精氨酸和亮氨酸浓度,而BFP仅对精氨酸有显著提高(p<0.05)。此外,CKP组的这种增加更为显著(p<0.05)。CKP组EAA和亮氨酸的最大浓度(Cmax)、曲线下面积(AUC0-t)和产期(Tmax)均显著高于BFP组(p<0.05)。对于SAA,精氨酸的CKP Cmax和AUC0-t显著大于BFP (p<0.05)。CKP对EAA、SAA和亮氨酸的相对生物利用度优于BFP,这表明CKP可能比BFP更有效地刺激MPS并促进恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Isolated Chicken Protein as Compared to Beef Protein in Healthy Active Adults
High-quality proteins of various sources stimulate Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS); however, less is known about the comparative bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of typical dietary proteins. This was a prospective, randomized, pharmacokinetic, exploratory clinical trial to evaluate the amino acid bioavailability of chicken protein isolate [Chik│Pro™ (CKP)] compared to Beef Protein Isolate (BFP). Twenty-two participants were randomized to receive both proteins in a cross-over design. Participants fasted overnight for at least eight hours and in a single blind fashion consumed 25 grams protein of CKP or BFP on day 4. Venous blood samples were collected for Total Amino Acid (TAA), Essential Amino Acid (EAA), Sulfur-containing Amino Acid (SAA), leucine, and arginine analysis one hour prior to ingestion (pre-in- gestion) and post-ingestion at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes. Statistical analyses were performed with paired t-tests, ANOVA, and the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test (p<0.05). Pharmacokinetic analysis was determined by mixed-model effects ANOVA. CKP produced significant increases in TAA, EAA, SAA, arginine and leucine concen - trations at 30 through 180 minutes (C30 min-C180 min) following ingestion, while BFP was only capable of this for arginine (p<0.05). Furthermore, these increases were shown to be significantly greater for CKP (p<0.05). The Maximum Concentration (Cmax), Area Under the Curve (AUC0-t), and Time of Delivery (Tmax) for EAA and leucine were significantly greater for CKP compared to BFP (p<0.05). For SAA, the CKP Cmax and AUC0-t for arginine was significantly greater than BFP (p<0.05). CKP was found to be superior to BFP in relative bioavailability for EAA, SAA, and leucine suggesting it may stimulate MPS and enhance recovery more effectively than BFP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信