通过自学变得“优秀”

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Kitchen, A. Berry
{"title":"通过自学变得“优秀”","authors":"J. Kitchen, A. Berry","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are honored to include in this issue ‘Of What Do We Testify? A Meditation on Becoming “Good” and on the Nature of “Self” in Self-Study,’ by Robert V. Bullough, Jr. Bullough has been an important influence on many of us in the self-study of teacher education practices community. Before the emergence of self-study, Bullough took considerable interest in studying his practice and making public his insights into how to effectively prepare prospective teachers (e.g., Bullough & Gitlin, 1995). Later, Bullough and Pinnegar (2001) published ‘Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-Study Research.’ This article was significant in two respects: as a highly cited methodological guide and for the mainstream recognition of self-study through its publication in Educational Researcher. In ‘Of What Do We Testify?’ Bullough reflects on the moral claims embedded in self-study by asking ‘Does self-study research help its practitioners become “good,” to become better people?’ He returns to questions regarding the self in self-study through the lens of pragmatism: ‘Of what do we testify?’ Or, in more contemporary language, ‘Who am I? What do I stand for? What am I good for?’ By linking self with study, Bullough proposes that self-study ‘seems to proclaim the importance of the person and the quality of that person’s life to the quality of the practice. Hence, this meditation on self-study and on goodness.’ He does argue, however, exploring and understanding the self leads to ‘greater goodness and well-being.’ The arguments are complex and the literature cited is far-ranging in this thoughtful meditation on our approach to living and practicing teacher education. The other articles in this issue can also be considered in relation to becoming ‘good’ through self-study. Hopefulness in the face of challenges is a quality Bullough admires in the work of the self-study community: ‘at its center is a lively respect for the difficulty and value of the work.’ This hopefulness is evident in ‘“It’s Messy and It’s Frustrating at Times, but It’s Worth It.” Facilitating the Professional Development of Teachers Implementing an Innovation’ by Stephanie Beni, an emerging scholar and university instructor. In this self-study, Beni reports on her effort to teach twelve teachers how to incorporate a Meaningful Physical Education approach in their work. In the process of making the learning experience meaningful for her participants and collecting data for her self-study, Beni also discovered the importance of understanding her own identity and experience, aligning her values with her practices, and navigating the unexpected. While she acknowledges there is still much to learn and do, the sense of wonder Beni brings to the frustrations, tensions and messiness of teaching makes her hopeful as an educator and scholar. A similar sense of wonder and hope is evident in ‘What is the (Real) Agenda of a Critical Pedagogue? Self-Studying the Application of Freire in Moral-Political High School Education’ by Orit Schwarz-Franco and her critical friend, Oren Ergas. Schwarz-Franco studies her work as the initiator and instructor of ‘Moral Preparation for the Army’ in an STUDYING TEACHER EDUCATION 2021, VOL. 17, NO. 3, 253–255 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"253 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Becoming ‘Good’ through Self-Study\",\"authors\":\"J. Kitchen, A. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are honored to include in this issue ‘Of What Do We Testify? A Meditation on Becoming “Good” and on the Nature of “Self” in Self-Study,’ by Robert V. Bullough, Jr. Bullough has been an important influence on many of us in the self-study of teacher education practices community. Before the emergence of self-study, Bullough took considerable interest in studying his practice and making public his insights into how to effectively prepare prospective teachers (e.g., Bullough & Gitlin, 1995). Later, Bullough and Pinnegar (2001) published ‘Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-Study Research.’ This article was significant in two respects: as a highly cited methodological guide and for the mainstream recognition of self-study through its publication in Educational Researcher. In ‘Of What Do We Testify?’ Bullough reflects on the moral claims embedded in self-study by asking ‘Does self-study research help its practitioners become “good,” to become better people?’ He returns to questions regarding the self in self-study through the lens of pragmatism: ‘Of what do we testify?’ Or, in more contemporary language, ‘Who am I? What do I stand for? What am I good for?’ By linking self with study, Bullough proposes that self-study ‘seems to proclaim the importance of the person and the quality of that person’s life to the quality of the practice. Hence, this meditation on self-study and on goodness.’ He does argue, however, exploring and understanding the self leads to ‘greater goodness and well-being.’ The arguments are complex and the literature cited is far-ranging in this thoughtful meditation on our approach to living and practicing teacher education. The other articles in this issue can also be considered in relation to becoming ‘good’ through self-study. Hopefulness in the face of challenges is a quality Bullough admires in the work of the self-study community: ‘at its center is a lively respect for the difficulty and value of the work.’ This hopefulness is evident in ‘“It’s Messy and It’s Frustrating at Times, but It’s Worth It.” Facilitating the Professional Development of Teachers Implementing an Innovation’ by Stephanie Beni, an emerging scholar and university instructor. In this self-study, Beni reports on her effort to teach twelve teachers how to incorporate a Meaningful Physical Education approach in their work. In the process of making the learning experience meaningful for her participants and collecting data for her self-study, Beni also discovered the importance of understanding her own identity and experience, aligning her values with her practices, and navigating the unexpected. While she acknowledges there is still much to learn and do, the sense of wonder Beni brings to the frustrations, tensions and messiness of teaching makes her hopeful as an educator and scholar. A similar sense of wonder and hope is evident in ‘What is the (Real) Agenda of a Critical Pedagogue? Self-Studying the Application of Freire in Moral-Political High School Education’ by Orit Schwarz-Franco and her critical friend, Oren Ergas. Schwarz-Franco studies her work as the initiator and instructor of ‘Moral Preparation for the Army’ in an STUDYING TEACHER EDUCATION 2021, VOL. 17, NO. 3, 253–255 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242\",\"PeriodicalId\":45793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们很荣幸在本期中加入“我们为什么作证?”小罗伯特·v·布洛的《在自学中成为“善”的沉思和“自我”的本质》一书对我们教师教育实践界的许多人都产生了重要的影响。在自学出现之前,Bullough对研究自己的实践非常感兴趣,并公开了他对如何有效培养未来教师的见解(例如,Bullough & Gitlin, 1995)。后来,布洛和平尼格(2001)出版了《自传体形式自学研究的质量指南》。这篇文章在两个方面具有重要意义:作为一个被高度引用的方法论指南,以及通过发表在《教育研究者》上对自学的主流认可。在《我们要作证什么?》布洛提出了这样一个问题,反思了嵌入在自学中的道德主张:“自学研究是否能帮助实践者变得‘好’,成为更好的人?”他通过实用主义的视角回到了关于自学中的自我的问题:“我们证明了什么?”或者,用更现代的语言来说,“我是谁?”我代表什么?我有什么长处?通过将自我与学习联系起来,布洛提出,自学“似乎表明了个人的重要性,以及个人的生活质量对学习质量的重要性。”因此,这个关于自我学习和善良的冥想。然而,他确实认为,探索和理解自我会带来“更大的善良和幸福”。“争论很复杂,引用的文献也很广泛,这是对我们生活和实践教师教育方法的深思熟虑。”本期的其他文章也可以看作是关于通过自学变得“优秀”的。面对挑战时充满希望,这是布洛在自学社区工作中所欣赏的品质:“其核心是对工作的困难和价值的热烈尊重。”这种希望在“这很混乱,有时令人沮丧,但这是值得的”中表现得很明显。《促进教师实施创新的专业发展》作者:Stephanie Beni,一位新兴学者和大学讲师。在这项自学中,贝尼报告了她教12位老师如何将有意义的体育教育方法融入他们的工作中的努力。在使学习经历对她的参与者有意义和为她的自学收集数据的过程中,Beni也发现了理解自己的身份和经历,将自己的价值观与实践结合起来,以及驾驭意外的重要性。虽然她承认还有很多东西要学、要做,但贝尼给教学中的挫折、紧张和混乱带来的惊奇感,让她成为一名教育家和学者充满希望。在《批判教育者的(真实)议程是什么?》奥瑞特·施瓦茨-弗兰科和她的批判朋友奥伦·厄加斯合著的《自由教育在高中道德政治教育中的应用》。施瓦茨-佛朗哥研究她的工作作为发起者和讲师的“道德准备的军队”在研究教师教育2021年,卷17,NO。3,253 - 255 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Becoming ‘Good’ through Self-Study
We are honored to include in this issue ‘Of What Do We Testify? A Meditation on Becoming “Good” and on the Nature of “Self” in Self-Study,’ by Robert V. Bullough, Jr. Bullough has been an important influence on many of us in the self-study of teacher education practices community. Before the emergence of self-study, Bullough took considerable interest in studying his practice and making public his insights into how to effectively prepare prospective teachers (e.g., Bullough & Gitlin, 1995). Later, Bullough and Pinnegar (2001) published ‘Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-Study Research.’ This article was significant in two respects: as a highly cited methodological guide and for the mainstream recognition of self-study through its publication in Educational Researcher. In ‘Of What Do We Testify?’ Bullough reflects on the moral claims embedded in self-study by asking ‘Does self-study research help its practitioners become “good,” to become better people?’ He returns to questions regarding the self in self-study through the lens of pragmatism: ‘Of what do we testify?’ Or, in more contemporary language, ‘Who am I? What do I stand for? What am I good for?’ By linking self with study, Bullough proposes that self-study ‘seems to proclaim the importance of the person and the quality of that person’s life to the quality of the practice. Hence, this meditation on self-study and on goodness.’ He does argue, however, exploring and understanding the self leads to ‘greater goodness and well-being.’ The arguments are complex and the literature cited is far-ranging in this thoughtful meditation on our approach to living and practicing teacher education. The other articles in this issue can also be considered in relation to becoming ‘good’ through self-study. Hopefulness in the face of challenges is a quality Bullough admires in the work of the self-study community: ‘at its center is a lively respect for the difficulty and value of the work.’ This hopefulness is evident in ‘“It’s Messy and It’s Frustrating at Times, but It’s Worth It.” Facilitating the Professional Development of Teachers Implementing an Innovation’ by Stephanie Beni, an emerging scholar and university instructor. In this self-study, Beni reports on her effort to teach twelve teachers how to incorporate a Meaningful Physical Education approach in their work. In the process of making the learning experience meaningful for her participants and collecting data for her self-study, Beni also discovered the importance of understanding her own identity and experience, aligning her values with her practices, and navigating the unexpected. While she acknowledges there is still much to learn and do, the sense of wonder Beni brings to the frustrations, tensions and messiness of teaching makes her hopeful as an educator and scholar. A similar sense of wonder and hope is evident in ‘What is the (Real) Agenda of a Critical Pedagogue? Self-Studying the Application of Freire in Moral-Political High School Education’ by Orit Schwarz-Franco and her critical friend, Oren Ergas. Schwarz-Franco studies her work as the initiator and instructor of ‘Moral Preparation for the Army’ in an STUDYING TEACHER EDUCATION 2021, VOL. 17, NO. 3, 253–255 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2021.1997242
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信