复杂性状遗传学中情境依赖建模的权衡。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Eric Weine, Samuel Pattillo Smith, Rebecca Kathryn Knowlton, Arbel Harpak
{"title":"复杂性状遗传学中情境依赖建模的权衡。","authors":"Eric Weine, Samuel Pattillo Smith, Rebecca Kathryn Knowlton, Arbel Harpak","doi":"10.1101/2023.06.21.545998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic effects on complex traits may depend on context, such as age, sex, environmental exposures or social settings. However, it is often unclear if the extent of context dependency, or Gene-by-Environment interaction (GxE), merits more involved models than the additive model typically used to analyze data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here, we suggest considering the utility of GxE models in GWAS as a tradeoff between bias and variance parameters. In particular, We derive a decision rule for choosing between competing models for the estimation of allelic effects. The rule weighs the increased estimation noise when context is considered against the potential bias when context dependency is ignored. In the empirical example of GxSex in human physiology, the increased noise of context-specific estimation often outweighs the bias reduction, rendering GxE models less useful when variants are considered independently. However, we argue that for complex traits, the joint consideration of context dependency across many variants mitigates both noise and bias. As a result, polygenic GxE models can improve both estimation and trait prediction. Finally, we exemplify (using GxDiet effects on longevity in fruit flies) how analyses based on independently ascertained \"top hits\" alone can be misleading, and that considering polygenic patterns of GxE can improve interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"35 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10871201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradeoffs in Modeling Context Dependency in Complex Trait Genetics.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Weine, Samuel Pattillo Smith, Rebecca Kathryn Knowlton, Arbel Harpak\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.06.21.545998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genetic effects on complex traits may depend on context, such as age, sex, environmental exposures or social settings. However, it is often unclear if the extent of context dependency, or Gene-by-Environment interaction (GxE), merits more involved models than the additive model typically used to analyze data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here, we suggest considering the utility of GxE models in GWAS as a tradeoff between bias and variance parameters. In particular, We derive a decision rule for choosing between competing models for the estimation of allelic effects. The rule weighs the increased estimation noise when context is considered against the potential bias when context dependency is ignored. In the empirical example of GxSex in human physiology, the increased noise of context-specific estimation often outweighs the bias reduction, rendering GxE models less useful when variants are considered independently. However, we argue that for complex traits, the joint consideration of context dependency across many variants mitigates both noise and bias. As a result, polygenic GxE models can improve both estimation and trait prediction. Finally, we exemplify (using GxDiet effects on longevity in fruit flies) how analyses based on independently ascertained \\\"top hits\\\" alone can be misleading, and that considering polygenic patterns of GxE can improve interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"35 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10871201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.21.545998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.21.545998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因对复杂性状的影响可能取决于环境,如年龄、性别、环境暴露或社会环境。然而,与通常用于分析全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据的加法模型相比,人们往往不清楚环境依赖性或基因与环境交互作用(GxE)的程度是否需要更多的模型。在此,我们建议将 GxE 模型在全基因组关联研究中的实用性视为偏差和方差参数之间的权衡。特别是,我们推导出一种决策规则,用于在估计等位基因效应的竞争模型之间进行选择。该规则权衡了考虑上下文时增加的估算噪声与忽略上下文依赖性时的潜在偏差。以人类生理学中的 GxSex 为实证例子,特定情境估算所增加的噪声往往大于偏差的减少,这使得 GxE 模型在独立考虑变异时不那么有用。然而,我们认为,对于复杂的性状,联合考虑许多变体的上下文依赖模式可以改善估计和性状预测。最后,我们举例说明(利用 GxDiet 对果蝇寿命的影响)考虑 GxE 的多基因趋势对解释也可能很重要,因为仅基于独立确定的 "热门 "分析可能会产生误导:全基因组关联研究显示,根据环境(如年龄、性别、环境暴露)对复杂性状产生遗传效应的证据少得令人吃惊。与此同时,我们从过去二十年的全基因组关联研究中了解到,加性性状变异往往是由于基因组的大部分微小贡献造成的。这一观察改变了我们的视角,并激发了我们在方法论上的努力,以分析这些来自整个基因组的更微妙、更难解释的关联以及核心基因。在这里,我们通过理论和经验实例论证,在考虑高多基因性方面的类似转变,是我们理解复杂性状的背景特异性所缺少的重要一环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tradeoffs in Modeling Context Dependency in Complex Trait Genetics.

Genetic effects on complex traits may depend on context, such as age, sex, environmental exposures or social settings. However, it is often unclear if the extent of context dependency, or Gene-by-Environment interaction (GxE), merits more involved models than the additive model typically used to analyze data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here, we suggest considering the utility of GxE models in GWAS as a tradeoff between bias and variance parameters. In particular, We derive a decision rule for choosing between competing models for the estimation of allelic effects. The rule weighs the increased estimation noise when context is considered against the potential bias when context dependency is ignored. In the empirical example of GxSex in human physiology, the increased noise of context-specific estimation often outweighs the bias reduction, rendering GxE models less useful when variants are considered independently. However, we argue that for complex traits, the joint consideration of context dependency across many variants mitigates both noise and bias. As a result, polygenic GxE models can improve both estimation and trait prediction. Finally, we exemplify (using GxDiet effects on longevity in fruit flies) how analyses based on independently ascertained "top hits" alone can be misleading, and that considering polygenic patterns of GxE can improve interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信