短通讯:影响磷灰石裂变径迹计数的实验因素

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Carol B. Aslanian, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher
{"title":"短通讯:影响磷灰石裂变径迹计数的实验因素","authors":"Carol B. Aslanian, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even\nso, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that\ntrack etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We\ninvestigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and\nobservation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on\nthe phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages,\nwhilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is\npertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training\nstrategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"369 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite\",\"authors\":\"Carol B. Aslanian, R. Jonckheere, B. Wauschkuhn, L. Ratschbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even\\nso, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that\\ntrack etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We\\ninvestigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and\\nobservation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on\\nthe phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages,\\nwhilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is\\npertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training\\nstrategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"369 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-109-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要用于解释裂变轨迹数据的工具正在迅速发展,但即便如此,结果也不可能比数据更好。近年来的研究表明,径迹蚀刻和观测会影响受限径迹长度的测量。研究了晶粒取向、抛光、蚀刻和观察对磷灰石裂变径迹计数的影响。我们的发现揭示了影响足迹数量和样本年龄的现象,同时提出了一个问题:什么算蚀刻表面足迹?这与手动和自动轨迹计数以及设计神经网络的训练策略有关。计算棱镜面和使用ζ校准年龄计算假设处理大多数蚀刻和计数相关的因素。然而,棱镜面不是没有问题的计数,和其他表面方向也不是不可用。我们的研究结果表明,重新研究不同磷灰石表面的蚀刻特性可以增加测年的有用范围,并解除对物源研究的重大限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short communication: Experimental factors affecting fission-track counts in apatite
Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even so, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that track etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We investigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and observation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on the phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages, whilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is pertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training strategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信