基于CREAM的石油化工控制室认知人为错误分析

Sana Shokria, S. Varmazyar, Payam Heydari
{"title":"基于CREAM的石油化工控制室认知人为错误分析","authors":"Sana Shokria, S. Varmazyar, Payam Heydari","doi":"10.5812/BHS-38592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The cognitive human error analysis technique is one of the second-generation techniques used to evaluate human reliability; it has a strong, detailed theoretical background that focuses on the important cognitive features of human behavior. \nObjectives: The aim of this study was to assign task and jobs crisis using analysis of cognitive human error with CREAM. Finally, based on the results, the major causes of error were detected. \nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 people working in an olefin unit. It is one of the most important control rooms located in a special economic zone in Assaluyeh petrochemical industry. In this study, first a job analysis was conducted and the sub-tasks and conditions affecting the performance of the staff were determined. Then, the control mode coefficient and \ncontrol mode type, as well as the possibility of total error were determined. Finally, the cognitive functions and type of cognitive error related to each sub-task were identified. \nResults: Amongthe six evaluated occupational tasks, the tasks performed by board-manandsite-manhadthe highest values of total human error in terms of transitory overall error coefficient (0.056 and 0.031, respectively). In addition, the following results were \nobtained on the basis of the extended CREAM: execution failure (31.72%), interpretation failure (29.20%), planning failure (14.63%), and observation failure (24.39%). \nConclusions: Common Performance Conditions (CPCs), empowerment, and the time available for work were among the most important factors that reduced occupational performance. To optimize a communication system, it is necessary to arrange the priority of tasks, hold joint meetings, inform the staff about the termination of work permits, hold training sessions, and measure the pollutants. \nKeywords: Human Error, Control Room, Petrochemical Industry, CREAM","PeriodicalId":8849,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry\",\"authors\":\"Sana Shokria, S. Varmazyar, Payam Heydari\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/BHS-38592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The cognitive human error analysis technique is one of the second-generation techniques used to evaluate human reliability; it has a strong, detailed theoretical background that focuses on the important cognitive features of human behavior. \\nObjectives: The aim of this study was to assign task and jobs crisis using analysis of cognitive human error with CREAM. Finally, based on the results, the major causes of error were detected. \\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 people working in an olefin unit. It is one of the most important control rooms located in a special economic zone in Assaluyeh petrochemical industry. In this study, first a job analysis was conducted and the sub-tasks and conditions affecting the performance of the staff were determined. Then, the control mode coefficient and \\ncontrol mode type, as well as the possibility of total error were determined. Finally, the cognitive functions and type of cognitive error related to each sub-task were identified. \\nResults: Amongthe six evaluated occupational tasks, the tasks performed by board-manandsite-manhadthe highest values of total human error in terms of transitory overall error coefficient (0.056 and 0.031, respectively). In addition, the following results were \\nobtained on the basis of the extended CREAM: execution failure (31.72%), interpretation failure (29.20%), planning failure (14.63%), and observation failure (24.39%). \\nConclusions: Common Performance Conditions (CPCs), empowerment, and the time available for work were among the most important factors that reduced occupational performance. To optimize a communication system, it is necessary to arrange the priority of tasks, hold joint meetings, inform the staff about the termination of work permits, hold training sessions, and measure the pollutants. \\nKeywords: Human Error, Control Room, Petrochemical Industry, CREAM\",\"PeriodicalId\":8849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/BHS-38592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/BHS-38592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:认知人为错误分析技术是评估人的可靠性的第二代技术之一;它有一个强大的,详细的理论背景,侧重于人类行为的重要认知特征。目的:本研究的目的是利用认知人为错误的分析来分配任务和工作危机。最后,根据分析结果,找出了产生误差的主要原因。方法:对某烯烃装置53人进行了横断面研究。它是位于阿萨卢耶石油化工经济特区内最重要的控制室之一。在本研究中,首先进行了工作分析,确定了影响员工绩效的子任务和条件。然后,确定了控制模式系数、控制模式类型以及总误差的可能性。最后,对每个子任务相关的认知功能和认知错误类型进行了识别。结果:在6个被评估的职业任务中,董事会-管理人员和现场-管理人员的总人为误差在短暂总体误差系数方面最高(分别为0.056和0.031)。此外,在扩展的CREAM基础上获得以下结果:执行失败(31.72%),解释失败(29.20%),计划失败(14.63%),观察失败(24.39%)。结论:共同绩效条件(CPCs)、授权和可用于工作的时间是降低职业绩效的最重要因素。为了优化沟通系统,需要安排任务的优先级,召开联席会议,通知员工终止工作许可,举办培训课程,测量污染物。关键词:人为失误,控制室,石油化工,奶油
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cognitive Human Error Analysis with CREAM in Control Room of Petrochemical Industry
Background: The cognitive human error analysis technique is one of the second-generation techniques used to evaluate human reliability; it has a strong, detailed theoretical background that focuses on the important cognitive features of human behavior. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assign task and jobs crisis using analysis of cognitive human error with CREAM. Finally, based on the results, the major causes of error were detected. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 53 people working in an olefin unit. It is one of the most important control rooms located in a special economic zone in Assaluyeh petrochemical industry. In this study, first a job analysis was conducted and the sub-tasks and conditions affecting the performance of the staff were determined. Then, the control mode coefficient and control mode type, as well as the possibility of total error were determined. Finally, the cognitive functions and type of cognitive error related to each sub-task were identified. Results: Amongthe six evaluated occupational tasks, the tasks performed by board-manandsite-manhadthe highest values of total human error in terms of transitory overall error coefficient (0.056 and 0.031, respectively). In addition, the following results were obtained on the basis of the extended CREAM: execution failure (31.72%), interpretation failure (29.20%), planning failure (14.63%), and observation failure (24.39%). Conclusions: Common Performance Conditions (CPCs), empowerment, and the time available for work were among the most important factors that reduced occupational performance. To optimize a communication system, it is necessary to arrange the priority of tasks, hold joint meetings, inform the staff about the termination of work permits, hold training sessions, and measure the pollutants. Keywords: Human Error, Control Room, Petrochemical Industry, CREAM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信