球键合与带状键合高频性能的比较研究

Chien-Cheng Wei, Chin-Ta Fan, Ta-Hsiang Chiang, Ming-Kuen Chiu, S. Ru
{"title":"球键合与带状键合高频性能的比较研究","authors":"Chien-Cheng Wei, Chin-Ta Fan, Ta-Hsiang Chiang, Ming-Kuen Chiu, S. Ru","doi":"10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of high-frequency performance between ball bonding and ribbon bonding. In many microwave applications above 10-GHz, ribbon bonding is usually used because of its high frequency and high power characteristics. In general, ribbon bonding with rectangle-shaped wire will provide lower impedance and inductance at higher frequency than round wire, which also achieve the advantages of stable, less deformation, and low loop height. However these results were not made under a fair comparison between ribbon wire and round wire. In this paper, two objective comparisons for ribbon and round wires have been accomplished under the same conditions on their wire cross-section area and surface area. Therefore, three types of bonding wires, 0.5 × 2 mils ribbon bonding, 2 mils round wire ball/wedge bonding, and 0.8 mils round wire ball bonding were measured up to 20-GHz individually, to analyze their high-frequency characteristics on self-inductance, self-resonant frequency (fSR), and insertion loss (IL) with the same cross-section area and surface area conditions. Based on the measurement results, round wire has lower inductance and IL, and higher fSR compared to ribbon wire when they have the same wire cross-section area. As for the same wire surface area, these three parameters were almost identical for both ribbon and round wires due to the skin effect. It clearly demonstrates that the surface area of conductor determines the current carrying ability instead of the cross section area, and dominates the high-frequency performance of a bonding wire. These experimental results have been systematically compared for verification.","PeriodicalId":6410,"journal":{"name":"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference","volume":"27 1","pages":"685-688"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison study of high-frequency performance between ball bonding and ribbon bonding\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Cheng Wei, Chin-Ta Fan, Ta-Hsiang Chiang, Ming-Kuen Chiu, S. Ru\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of high-frequency performance between ball bonding and ribbon bonding. In many microwave applications above 10-GHz, ribbon bonding is usually used because of its high frequency and high power characteristics. In general, ribbon bonding with rectangle-shaped wire will provide lower impedance and inductance at higher frequency than round wire, which also achieve the advantages of stable, less deformation, and low loop height. However these results were not made under a fair comparison between ribbon wire and round wire. In this paper, two objective comparisons for ribbon and round wires have been accomplished under the same conditions on their wire cross-section area and surface area. Therefore, three types of bonding wires, 0.5 × 2 mils ribbon bonding, 2 mils round wire ball/wedge bonding, and 0.8 mils round wire ball bonding were measured up to 20-GHz individually, to analyze their high-frequency characteristics on self-inductance, self-resonant frequency (fSR), and insertion loss (IL) with the same cross-section area and surface area conditions. Based on the measurement results, round wire has lower inductance and IL, and higher fSR compared to ribbon wire when they have the same wire cross-section area. As for the same wire surface area, these three parameters were almost identical for both ribbon and round wires due to the skin effect. It clearly demonstrates that the surface area of conductor determines the current carrying ability instead of the cross section area, and dominates the high-frequency performance of a bonding wire. These experimental results have been systematically compared for verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"685-688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 4th International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMPACT.2009.5382280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文对球键合和带状键合的高频性能进行了全面比较。在10ghz以上的许多微波应用中,由于其高频和高功率特性,通常使用带状键合。一般情况下,矩形导线的带状键合在较高频率下比圆形导线提供更低的阻抗和电感,同时也实现了稳定、变形小、回路高度低的优点。然而,这些结果并不是在带状线和圆线的公平比较下得出的。在相同的条件下,对带状线和圆形线的截面积和比表面积进行了客观的比较。因此,在20 ghz范围内分别测量了0.5 × 2 mil带状键合、2 mil圆丝球/楔键合和0.8 mil圆丝球键合三种类型的键合线,分析了它们在相同截面面积和表面积条件下的自感、自谐振频率(fSR)和插入损耗(IL)等高频特性。根据测量结果,在相同的导线截面面积下,圆线的电感和IL比带状线低,fSR比带状线高。对于相同的导线表面积,由于趋肤效应,这三个参数对于带状和圆形导线几乎相同。由此可见,决定载流能力的是导体的表面积,而不是截面面积,并在键合线的高频性能中占主导地位。对这些实验结果进行了系统的比较验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison study of high-frequency performance between ball bonding and ribbon bonding
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of high-frequency performance between ball bonding and ribbon bonding. In many microwave applications above 10-GHz, ribbon bonding is usually used because of its high frequency and high power characteristics. In general, ribbon bonding with rectangle-shaped wire will provide lower impedance and inductance at higher frequency than round wire, which also achieve the advantages of stable, less deformation, and low loop height. However these results were not made under a fair comparison between ribbon wire and round wire. In this paper, two objective comparisons for ribbon and round wires have been accomplished under the same conditions on their wire cross-section area and surface area. Therefore, three types of bonding wires, 0.5 × 2 mils ribbon bonding, 2 mils round wire ball/wedge bonding, and 0.8 mils round wire ball bonding were measured up to 20-GHz individually, to analyze their high-frequency characteristics on self-inductance, self-resonant frequency (fSR), and insertion loss (IL) with the same cross-section area and surface area conditions. Based on the measurement results, round wire has lower inductance and IL, and higher fSR compared to ribbon wire when they have the same wire cross-section area. As for the same wire surface area, these three parameters were almost identical for both ribbon and round wires due to the skin effect. It clearly demonstrates that the surface area of conductor determines the current carrying ability instead of the cross section area, and dominates the high-frequency performance of a bonding wire. These experimental results have been systematically compared for verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信