社区卫生保健提供者作为研究参与者招募看门人:现实世界案例中的道德和法律问题

IF 2.1 Q2 ETHICS
Karen L. Celedonia, Michael W. Valenti, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, M. Lowery Wilson
{"title":"社区卫生保健提供者作为研究参与者招募看门人:现实世界案例中的道德和法律问题","authors":"Karen L. Celedonia, Michael W. Valenti, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, M. Lowery Wilson","doi":"10.1177/1747016120980560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based mental health care providers (CBMHCPs) are increasingly contacted by external researchers for research study recruitment. Unfortunately, many do not possess the resources or personnel with the skills required to successfully evaluate research proposals for risks. Providing access to clients and client health information can result in harmful personal and legal consequences if the proper safeguards do not exist. This article discusses the legal requirements and practical implications for CBMHCPs when acting as gatekeepers. A case study from a large CBMHCP is presented as an illustration of steps that can be taken to protect clients and avoid risk. Additional recommendations for establishing protective safeguards and research evaluation protocols are discussed.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"114 1","pages":"242 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-based health care providers as research participant recruitment gatekeepers: ethical and legal issues in a real-world case example\",\"authors\":\"Karen L. Celedonia, Michael W. Valenti, Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci, M. Lowery Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1747016120980560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Community-based mental health care providers (CBMHCPs) are increasingly contacted by external researchers for research study recruitment. Unfortunately, many do not possess the resources or personnel with the skills required to successfully evaluate research proposals for risks. Providing access to clients and client health information can result in harmful personal and legal consequences if the proper safeguards do not exist. This article discusses the legal requirements and practical implications for CBMHCPs when acting as gatekeepers. A case study from a large CBMHCP is presented as an illustration of steps that can be taken to protect clients and avoid risk. Additional recommendations for establishing protective safeguards and research evaluation protocols are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Ethics\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"242 - 250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

外部研究人员越来越多地联系以社区为基础的精神卫生保健提供者(CBMHCPs)进行研究招募。不幸的是,许多国家不具备成功评估研究提案风险所需的资源或技能人员。如果没有适当的保障措施,提供接触客户和客户健康信息的机会可能导致有害的个人和法律后果。本文讨论了CBMHCPs作为看门人时的法律要求和实际含义。本文提出了一个大型CBMHCP的案例研究,以说明可以采取哪些步骤来保护客户并避免风险。讨论了关于建立保护性保障措施和研究评价规程的其他建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-based health care providers as research participant recruitment gatekeepers: ethical and legal issues in a real-world case example
Community-based mental health care providers (CBMHCPs) are increasingly contacted by external researchers for research study recruitment. Unfortunately, many do not possess the resources or personnel with the skills required to successfully evaluate research proposals for risks. Providing access to clients and client health information can result in harmful personal and legal consequences if the proper safeguards do not exist. This article discusses the legal requirements and practical implications for CBMHCPs when acting as gatekeepers. A case study from a large CBMHCP is presented as an illustration of steps that can be taken to protect clients and avoid risk. Additional recommendations for establishing protective safeguards and research evaluation protocols are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信