阿瑞吡坦/格拉司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松在妇科肿瘤紫杉醇卡铂联合治疗中的止吐效果比较

K. Obayashi, A. Nagamine, H. Yashima, S. Ohshima, C. Uchiyama, E. Takahashi, Y. Takahashi, T. Araki, K. Yamamoto
{"title":"阿瑞吡坦/格拉司琼与帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松在妇科肿瘤紫杉醇卡铂联合治疗中的止吐效果比较","authors":"K. Obayashi, A. Nagamine, H. Yashima, S. Ohshima, C. Uchiyama, E. Takahashi, Y. Takahashi, T. Araki, K. Yamamoto","doi":"10.1691/ph.2022.12000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A triple antiemetic therapy combining aprepitant (APR) with conventional double antiemetic therapy, including 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT₃-RA) and dexamethasone (DEX), is recommended for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting induced by a carboplatin (CBDCA) regimen. However, consensus on the additive effects of APR for gynecological patients on a combined regimen of paclitaxel and CBDCA (TC regimen) has yet to be reached. This retrospective study investigated the antiemetic effects of palonosetron and DEX (PD therapy) and granisetron and DEX with APR (GDA therapy) in patients with gynecologic cancer and who underwent their first TC regimen cycle between April 2017 and March 2020 at the Gunma University Hospital Outpatient Chemotherapy Center. The results showed that the complete response rate of the 92 patients who underwent PD therapy (PD group) and the 46 patients who underwent GDA therapy (GDA group) were both 80.4% (p = 1.000), and the complete control rates of the PD and GDA groups were 78.3% and 80.4%, respectively (p = 0.828), resulting in no significant difference. Furthermore, we observed no significant difference between the PD and GDA groups in the incidence of grade ≥2 nausea, vomiting, and anorexia (nausea: 7.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.095; vomiting: 4.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.301; and anorexia: 9.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.164). Concerning adverse events, compared to the PD group, the GDA group showed significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 malaise (7.6% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.039). Given the lack of difference in the antiemetic effects of PD and GDA therapies, antiemetic therapy should be selected carefully for individual patients by accounting for the incidence of adverse reactions and interactions with APR.","PeriodicalId":86039,"journal":{"name":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","volume":"465 1","pages":"157-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Antiemetic Effect of Aprepitant/granisetron and Palonosetron Combined with Dexamethasone in Gynecological Cancer Patients Treated with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Regimen.\",\"authors\":\"K. Obayashi, A. Nagamine, H. Yashima, S. Ohshima, C. Uchiyama, E. Takahashi, Y. Takahashi, T. Araki, K. Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1691/ph.2022.12000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A triple antiemetic therapy combining aprepitant (APR) with conventional double antiemetic therapy, including 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT₃-RA) and dexamethasone (DEX), is recommended for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting induced by a carboplatin (CBDCA) regimen. However, consensus on the additive effects of APR for gynecological patients on a combined regimen of paclitaxel and CBDCA (TC regimen) has yet to be reached. This retrospective study investigated the antiemetic effects of palonosetron and DEX (PD therapy) and granisetron and DEX with APR (GDA therapy) in patients with gynecologic cancer and who underwent their first TC regimen cycle between April 2017 and March 2020 at the Gunma University Hospital Outpatient Chemotherapy Center. The results showed that the complete response rate of the 92 patients who underwent PD therapy (PD group) and the 46 patients who underwent GDA therapy (GDA group) were both 80.4% (p = 1.000), and the complete control rates of the PD and GDA groups were 78.3% and 80.4%, respectively (p = 0.828), resulting in no significant difference. Furthermore, we observed no significant difference between the PD and GDA groups in the incidence of grade ≥2 nausea, vomiting, and anorexia (nausea: 7.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.095; vomiting: 4.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.301; and anorexia: 9.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.164). Concerning adverse events, compared to the PD group, the GDA group showed significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 malaise (7.6% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.039). Given the lack of difference in the antiemetic effects of PD and GDA therapies, antiemetic therapy should be selected carefully for individual patients by accounting for the incidence of adverse reactions and interactions with APR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":86039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte\",\"volume\":\"465 1\",\"pages\":\"157-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2022.12000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2022.12000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿瑞匹坦(APR)联合5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂(5-HT₃-RA)和地塞米松(DEX)等常规双重止吐疗法,被推荐用于预防化疗引起的卡铂(CBDCA)方案引起的恶心和呕吐。然而,妇科患者APR对紫杉醇与CBDCA联合方案(TC方案)的附加效应尚未达成共识。本回顾性研究探讨了2017年4月至2020年3月在群马大学医院门诊化疗中心接受第一个TC方案周期的妇科癌症患者,帕洛诺司琼联合右美托咪酮(PD治疗)和格拉司琼联合右美托咪酮联合APR (GDA治疗)的止吐效果。结果显示,接受PD治疗的92例患者(PD组)和接受GDA治疗的46例患者(GDA组)的完全缓解率均为80.4% (p = 1.000), PD组和GDA组的完全控制率分别为78.3%和80.4% (p = 0.828),差异无统计学意义。此外,我们观察到PD组和GDA组在≥2级恶心、呕吐和厌食症的发生率方面无显著差异(恶心:7.6% vs 0%, p = 0.095;呕吐:4.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.301;厌食症:9.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.164)。关于不良事件,与PD组相比,GDA组的≥2级不适发生率显著高于PD组(7.6% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.039)。鉴于PD和GDA治疗的止吐效果没有差异,应考虑不良反应的发生率和与APR的相互作用,仔细选择个别患者的止吐治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Antiemetic Effect of Aprepitant/granisetron and Palonosetron Combined with Dexamethasone in Gynecological Cancer Patients Treated with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Combination Regimen.
A triple antiemetic therapy combining aprepitant (APR) with conventional double antiemetic therapy, including 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT₃-RA) and dexamethasone (DEX), is recommended for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting induced by a carboplatin (CBDCA) regimen. However, consensus on the additive effects of APR for gynecological patients on a combined regimen of paclitaxel and CBDCA (TC regimen) has yet to be reached. This retrospective study investigated the antiemetic effects of palonosetron and DEX (PD therapy) and granisetron and DEX with APR (GDA therapy) in patients with gynecologic cancer and who underwent their first TC regimen cycle between April 2017 and March 2020 at the Gunma University Hospital Outpatient Chemotherapy Center. The results showed that the complete response rate of the 92 patients who underwent PD therapy (PD group) and the 46 patients who underwent GDA therapy (GDA group) were both 80.4% (p = 1.000), and the complete control rates of the PD and GDA groups were 78.3% and 80.4%, respectively (p = 0.828), resulting in no significant difference. Furthermore, we observed no significant difference between the PD and GDA groups in the incidence of grade ≥2 nausea, vomiting, and anorexia (nausea: 7.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.095; vomiting: 4.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.301; and anorexia: 9.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.164). Concerning adverse events, compared to the PD group, the GDA group showed significantly higher incidence of grade ≥2 malaise (7.6% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.039). Given the lack of difference in the antiemetic effects of PD and GDA therapies, antiemetic therapy should be selected carefully for individual patients by accounting for the incidence of adverse reactions and interactions with APR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信