蒸腾不确定性对根区土壤水分影响的贝叶斯分析

Xianyue Li , Peiling Yang , Haibin Shi , Shumei Ren , Yunkai Li , Pingfeng Li , Caiyuan Wang
{"title":"蒸腾不确定性对根区土壤水分影响的贝叶斯分析","authors":"Xianyue Li ,&nbsp;Peiling Yang ,&nbsp;Haibin Shi ,&nbsp;Shumei Ren ,&nbsp;Yunkai Li ,&nbsp;Pingfeng Li ,&nbsp;Caiyuan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is very important to identify the uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water for improving water, fertilizer and agricultural chemical management. The canopy transpiration, dominating over evapotranspiration in a close planting orchard, is the main input data of soil water movement simulation for the model based on the Richard equation. However, transpiration estimations are always uncertain because of uncertainties of input data and model structure, which bring the uncertainties of root zone soil water simulation, reduce the simulation accuracy and cause model instability. So, quantitative study of uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water simulations are very important to raise the reliability of the simulation. In this study, a Bayesian approach was used to fit the transpiration model to half-hourly cherry transpiration rates, probabilistically estimate its parameters and predict the uncertainties. The probabilistic transpiration model was extended by adding a normally distributed error term, and the Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation method was used to determine the posterior parameter distributions, and the estimated transpirations of average, 95% upper and lower confidence limits were obtained as the input data of the Richard equation, and the simulations of soil water and root water uptake were then obtained. The results showed there were a large number of uncertainties for the transpiration, soil water and root water uptake, and soil water greatly changed in the 30 and 50 cm soil layer for the intensive root system, but there was only minor change in 10 and 110 cm soil layers for small roots. The mean relative error (MRE) was 4.3%, 8.64%, 14.53% between simulated and measured soil water for average, 95% upper and lower confidence limit estimated transpiration as input data, and it was 11.68%, 19.55%, 25.35% for root water uptake, respectively. Moreover, there were also very large uncertainties for cumulative root water uptake, and the maximum difference can reach about 100 mm after 100 simulation days. So, the effect of transpiration uncertainties on soil water and root water uptake should be paid attention to for improving water management and contamination risk assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49872,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","volume":"58 3","pages":"Pages 691-700"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.030","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of transpiration uncertainty on root zone soil water by Bayesian analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xianyue Li ,&nbsp;Peiling Yang ,&nbsp;Haibin Shi ,&nbsp;Shumei Ren ,&nbsp;Yunkai Li ,&nbsp;Pingfeng Li ,&nbsp;Caiyuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is very important to identify the uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water for improving water, fertilizer and agricultural chemical management. The canopy transpiration, dominating over evapotranspiration in a close planting orchard, is the main input data of soil water movement simulation for the model based on the Richard equation. However, transpiration estimations are always uncertain because of uncertainties of input data and model structure, which bring the uncertainties of root zone soil water simulation, reduce the simulation accuracy and cause model instability. So, quantitative study of uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water simulations are very important to raise the reliability of the simulation. In this study, a Bayesian approach was used to fit the transpiration model to half-hourly cherry transpiration rates, probabilistically estimate its parameters and predict the uncertainties. The probabilistic transpiration model was extended by adding a normally distributed error term, and the Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation method was used to determine the posterior parameter distributions, and the estimated transpirations of average, 95% upper and lower confidence limits were obtained as the input data of the Richard equation, and the simulations of soil water and root water uptake were then obtained. The results showed there were a large number of uncertainties for the transpiration, soil water and root water uptake, and soil water greatly changed in the 30 and 50 cm soil layer for the intensive root system, but there was only minor change in 10 and 110 cm soil layers for small roots. The mean relative error (MRE) was 4.3%, 8.64%, 14.53% between simulated and measured soil water for average, 95% upper and lower confidence limit estimated transpiration as input data, and it was 11.68%, 19.55%, 25.35% for root water uptake, respectively. Moreover, there were also very large uncertainties for cumulative root water uptake, and the maximum difference can reach about 100 mm after 100 simulation days. So, the effect of transpiration uncertainties on soil water and root water uptake should be paid attention to for improving water management and contamination risk assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical and Computer Modelling\",\"volume\":\"58 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 691-700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.030\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical and Computer Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717711006352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717711006352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

识别土壤蒸腾和根区土壤水分的不确定性对改善水肥和农化管理具有重要意义。基于Richard方程模型的土壤水分运动模拟的主要输入数据是林冠蒸腾,在密植果园中占主导地位。然而,由于输入数据和模型结构的不确定性,蒸腾估算往往存在不确定性,从而给根区土壤水分模拟带来不确定性,降低了模拟精度,导致模型不稳定。因此,定量研究蒸腾和根区土壤水分模拟的不确定性对提高模拟的可靠性具有重要意义。本研究采用贝叶斯方法拟合半小时樱桃蒸腾速率模型,对其参数进行概率估计,并预测不确定性。通过增加正态分布误差项对概率蒸腾模型进行扩展,利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗模拟方法确定后验参数分布,得到平均、95%上下限的估算蒸腾量作为Richard方程的输入数据,进而得到土壤水分和根系水分吸收的模拟结果。结果表明:土壤蒸腾、土壤水分和根系水分吸收存在较大的不确定性,集约根系的30和50 cm土层土壤水分变化较大,而小根系的10和110 cm土层土壤水分变化较小;土壤水分模拟值与实测值的平均相对误差(MRE)分别为4.3%、8.64%和14.53%,蒸腾估算值的上下限误差分别为95%,根系水分吸收估算值的上下限误差分别为11.68%、19.55%和25.35%。根系累积吸水量也存在很大的不确定性,模拟100 d后差异最大可达100 mm左右。因此,应重视蒸腾不确定性对土壤水分和根系水分吸收的影响,以改进水分管理和污染风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of transpiration uncertainty on root zone soil water by Bayesian analysis

It is very important to identify the uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water for improving water, fertilizer and agricultural chemical management. The canopy transpiration, dominating over evapotranspiration in a close planting orchard, is the main input data of soil water movement simulation for the model based on the Richard equation. However, transpiration estimations are always uncertain because of uncertainties of input data and model structure, which bring the uncertainties of root zone soil water simulation, reduce the simulation accuracy and cause model instability. So, quantitative study of uncertainties of transpiration and root zone soil water simulations are very important to raise the reliability of the simulation. In this study, a Bayesian approach was used to fit the transpiration model to half-hourly cherry transpiration rates, probabilistically estimate its parameters and predict the uncertainties. The probabilistic transpiration model was extended by adding a normally distributed error term, and the Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation method was used to determine the posterior parameter distributions, and the estimated transpirations of average, 95% upper and lower confidence limits were obtained as the input data of the Richard equation, and the simulations of soil water and root water uptake were then obtained. The results showed there were a large number of uncertainties for the transpiration, soil water and root water uptake, and soil water greatly changed in the 30 and 50 cm soil layer for the intensive root system, but there was only minor change in 10 and 110 cm soil layers for small roots. The mean relative error (MRE) was 4.3%, 8.64%, 14.53% between simulated and measured soil water for average, 95% upper and lower confidence limit estimated transpiration as input data, and it was 11.68%, 19.55%, 25.35% for root water uptake, respectively. Moreover, there were also very large uncertainties for cumulative root water uptake, and the maximum difference can reach about 100 mm after 100 simulation days. So, the effect of transpiration uncertainties on soil water and root water uptake should be paid attention to for improving water management and contamination risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical and Computer Modelling
Mathematical and Computer Modelling 数学-计算机:跨学科应用
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9.5 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信