客观衡量高等教育评估的时代性变化

Q4 Social Sciences
K. Royal, J. Gregg
{"title":"客观衡量高等教育评估的时代性变化","authors":"K. Royal, J. Gregg","doi":"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.1.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Institutional researchers and assessment professionals are often interested in measuring change across time, especially with data that were obtained via survey research. Unfortunately, measuring change across time poses a number of rather significant problems. For instance, the functioning of the survey items and/or rating scale may change, even in instances where the same instrument was previously administered. This can alter the substantive meaning of the findings. Further, when raw scores are misused as measures, this poses additional problems due to ambiguous frames of reference. This article provides an overview of an alternative approach to objectively measuring change across time, and provides a demonstration of this useful technique.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"149 1","pages":"19 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objectively Measuring Change across Time in Higher Education Assessment\",\"authors\":\"K. Royal, J. Gregg\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.1.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Institutional researchers and assessment professionals are often interested in measuring change across time, especially with data that were obtained via survey research. Unfortunately, measuring change across time poses a number of rather significant problems. For instance, the functioning of the survey items and/or rating scale may change, even in instances where the same instrument was previously administered. This can alter the substantive meaning of the findings. Further, when raw scores are misused as measures, this poses additional problems due to ambiguous frames of reference. This article provides an overview of an alternative approach to objectively measuring change across time, and provides a demonstration of this useful technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.1.0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.1.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

机构研究人员和评估专业人员经常对测量时间变化感兴趣,特别是通过调查研究获得的数据。不幸的是,测量随时间的变化会带来许多相当严重的问题。例如,调查项目和/或评定量表的功能可能会改变,即使在以前使用相同工具的情况下也是如此。这可能改变调查结果的实质意义。此外,当原始分数被误用为衡量标准时,由于参考框架不明确,这将带来额外的问题。本文概述了一种客观地度量时间变化的替代方法,并演示了这种有用的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objectively Measuring Change across Time in Higher Education Assessment
Institutional researchers and assessment professionals are often interested in measuring change across time, especially with data that were obtained via survey research. Unfortunately, measuring change across time poses a number of rather significant problems. For instance, the functioning of the survey items and/or rating scale may change, even in instances where the same instrument was previously administered. This can alter the substantive meaning of the findings. Further, when raw scores are misused as measures, this poses additional problems due to ambiguous frames of reference. This article provides an overview of an alternative approach to objectively measuring change across time, and provides a demonstration of this useful technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信