不评分:为什么给学生评分会影响学习(以及该怎么做)

Q4 Social Sciences
Comfort M. Ateh
{"title":"不评分:为什么给学生评分会影响学习(以及该怎么做)","authors":"Comfort M. Ateh","doi":"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.12.1-2.0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION In Ungrading’s foreword Kohn (2020) writes, “Many have come to realise that (a) grades have been driving much of what happens in classrooms, (b) this is a serious problem, and (c) it doesn't have to be this way” (Kohn 2020, xix). This establishes the impetus for this edited book promoting ungrading, an approach that recognises problems associated with traditional grading and seeks to shift the focus once more on learning. Ungrading has strong alignment with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)—see for instance Guberman (2021) and Gandara and Carter (2021)—as it encourages educators to resist what Warner (2020) describes as “teaching ‘folklore,’ the practices handed down instructor to instructor” (Warner 2020, 207). This book will resonate with SoTL scholars who yearn to promote deep learning and resist doing things (like graded assessments) merely because that is what has always been done. The fifteen chapters contributed by diverse authors give research-informed insights into their own practices and reflections (see Table 1). As part of an emerging field, Blum (2020b) clearly articulates the significance of these collected conversations: “putting these pieces together produces a picture of what is possible – a picture greater than any individual alone can produce” (Blum 2020b, 2).","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)\",\"authors\":\"Comfort M. Ateh\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jasseinsteffe.12.1-2.0114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION In Ungrading’s foreword Kohn (2020) writes, “Many have come to realise that (a) grades have been driving much of what happens in classrooms, (b) this is a serious problem, and (c) it doesn't have to be this way” (Kohn 2020, xix). This establishes the impetus for this edited book promoting ungrading, an approach that recognises problems associated with traditional grading and seeks to shift the focus once more on learning. Ungrading has strong alignment with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)—see for instance Guberman (2021) and Gandara and Carter (2021)—as it encourages educators to resist what Warner (2020) describes as “teaching ‘folklore,’ the practices handed down instructor to instructor” (Warner 2020, 207). This book will resonate with SoTL scholars who yearn to promote deep learning and resist doing things (like graded assessments) merely because that is what has always been done. The fifteen chapters contributed by diverse authors give research-informed insights into their own practices and reflections (see Table 1). As part of an emerging field, Blum (2020b) clearly articulates the significance of these collected conversations: “putting these pieces together produces a picture of what is possible – a picture greater than any individual alone can produce” (Blum 2020b, 2).\",\"PeriodicalId\":56185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.12.1-2.0114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.12.1-2.0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Ungrading的前言中,Kohn(2020)写道,“许多人已经意识到(a)分数一直在推动课堂上发生的大部分事情,(b)这是一个严重的问题,(c)它不必是这样的”(Kohn 2020, xix)。这为这本编辑过的书提供了动力,促进Ungrading,一种认识到与传统评分相关的问题,并试图将焦点再次转移到学习上的方法。Ungrading与Teaching and Learning Scholarship (SoTL)有很强的一致性——例如参见Guberman(2021)和Gandara and Carter(2021)——因为它鼓励教育工作者抵制Warner(2020)所描述的“教授‘民间传说’,即老师传给老师的做法”(Warner 2020, 207)。这本书将引起SoTL学者的共鸣,他们渴望推广深度学习,并拒绝做一些事情(如分级评估),仅仅因为这是一直在做的事情。由不同作者贡献的15章给出了他们自己的实践和思考的研究信息见解(见表1)。作为新兴领域的一部分,Blum (2020b)清楚地阐明了这些收集到的对话的重要性:“把这些碎片放在一起,就会产生一幅可能的图景——一幅比任何个人都能产生的更大的图景”(Blum 2020b, 2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead)
INTRODUCTION In Ungrading’s foreword Kohn (2020) writes, “Many have come to realise that (a) grades have been driving much of what happens in classrooms, (b) this is a serious problem, and (c) it doesn't have to be this way” (Kohn 2020, xix). This establishes the impetus for this edited book promoting ungrading, an approach that recognises problems associated with traditional grading and seeks to shift the focus once more on learning. Ungrading has strong alignment with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)—see for instance Guberman (2021) and Gandara and Carter (2021)—as it encourages educators to resist what Warner (2020) describes as “teaching ‘folklore,’ the practices handed down instructor to instructor” (Warner 2020, 207). This book will resonate with SoTL scholars who yearn to promote deep learning and resist doing things (like graded assessments) merely because that is what has always been done. The fifteen chapters contributed by diverse authors give research-informed insights into their own practices and reflections (see Table 1). As part of an emerging field, Blum (2020b) clearly articulates the significance of these collected conversations: “putting these pieces together produces a picture of what is possible – a picture greater than any individual alone can produce” (Blum 2020b, 2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信