雅典与大海

C. Mossé
{"title":"雅典与大海","authors":"C. Mossé","doi":"10.13135/2039-4985/1935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is first Herodotus and Thucydides who stress the importance of the sea in the history of Athens during the fifth century. Themistocles is the one who is credited for this, as he first realized that by the existence of a large fleet Athens would be able to oppose the ambitions of Xerxes. This explains the emphasis on the victory of Salamis (480) which sealed the fate of the second Persian war and shaped its consequences: the creation of the Delian League and the affirmation of Athenian imperialism. From a political point of view, this gave importance to those who served on the fleet as oarsmen, that is to say the majority of citizens who did not have the means to procure the panoply of the hoplite. The navy became thus one of the foundations of democracy as defined by Pericles. The Peloponnesian war and the two oligarchic revolutions of 411 and 404 put into question this balance. In the fourth century, criticism against democracy and the sea intensified particularly in Plato, Aristotle and in a more nuanced way in Xenophon, who in the Poroi argues that the fleet could now be an instrument of development of commercial trade. Indeed, the collapse of the second Athenian Confederacy did not destroy the fleet, but it was thereafter increasingly used to protect trade and was composed by increasingly fewer citizens who were now assured to participate in the hoplite war, due to a new tax (symmories, trierarchies). This change caused the break between sea control and democracy.","PeriodicalId":30377,"journal":{"name":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","volume":"22 1","pages":"517-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Athènes et la mer\",\"authors\":\"C. Mossé\",\"doi\":\"10.13135/2039-4985/1935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is first Herodotus and Thucydides who stress the importance of the sea in the history of Athens during the fifth century. Themistocles is the one who is credited for this, as he first realized that by the existence of a large fleet Athens would be able to oppose the ambitions of Xerxes. This explains the emphasis on the victory of Salamis (480) which sealed the fate of the second Persian war and shaped its consequences: the creation of the Delian League and the affirmation of Athenian imperialism. From a political point of view, this gave importance to those who served on the fleet as oarsmen, that is to say the majority of citizens who did not have the means to procure the panoply of the hoplite. The navy became thus one of the foundations of democracy as defined by Pericles. The Peloponnesian war and the two oligarchic revolutions of 411 and 404 put into question this balance. In the fourth century, criticism against democracy and the sea intensified particularly in Plato, Aristotle and in a more nuanced way in Xenophon, who in the Poroi argues that the fleet could now be an instrument of development of commercial trade. Indeed, the collapse of the second Athenian Confederacy did not destroy the fleet, but it was thereafter increasingly used to protect trade and was composed by increasingly fewer citizens who were now assured to participate in the hoplite war, due to a new tax (symmories, trierarchies). This change caused the break between sea control and democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"517-522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在5世纪的雅典历史中,首先强调海洋重要性的是希罗多德和修昔底德。地米斯托克利被认为是功不可没的人,因为他首先意识到,只要有一支庞大的舰队,雅典就能对抗薛西斯的野心。这解释了为什么强调萨拉米斯(480)的胜利,这场胜利决定了第二次波斯战争的命运,并决定了它的后果:德里安联盟的建立和雅典帝国主义的确立。从政治的角度来看,这对那些在舰队中担任桨手的人很重要,也就是说,大多数公民没有办法获得重装步兵的全副武装。因此,海军成为伯里克利所定义的民主的基础之一。伯罗奔尼撒战争和公元411年和公元404年的两次寡头革命使这种平衡受到质疑。在四世纪,对民主和海洋的批判尤其在柏拉图,亚里士多德和色诺芬的著作中更加尖锐,色诺芬在波罗的书中认为舰队现在可以成为商业贸易发展的工具。事实上,第二次雅典联盟的崩溃并没有摧毁舰队,但此后它越来越多地用于保护贸易,并且由于新的税收(symmories, trier等级制),由越来越少的公民组成,现在可以保证参加重装步兵战争。这一变化导致了海上控制与民主之间的断裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Athènes et la mer
It is first Herodotus and Thucydides who stress the importance of the sea in the history of Athens during the fifth century. Themistocles is the one who is credited for this, as he first realized that by the existence of a large fleet Athens would be able to oppose the ambitions of Xerxes. This explains the emphasis on the victory of Salamis (480) which sealed the fate of the second Persian war and shaped its consequences: the creation of the Delian League and the affirmation of Athenian imperialism. From a political point of view, this gave importance to those who served on the fleet as oarsmen, that is to say the majority of citizens who did not have the means to procure the panoply of the hoplite. The navy became thus one of the foundations of democracy as defined by Pericles. The Peloponnesian war and the two oligarchic revolutions of 411 and 404 put into question this balance. In the fourth century, criticism against democracy and the sea intensified particularly in Plato, Aristotle and in a more nuanced way in Xenophon, who in the Poroi argues that the fleet could now be an instrument of development of commercial trade. Indeed, the collapse of the second Athenian Confederacy did not destroy the fleet, but it was thereafter increasingly used to protect trade and was composed by increasingly fewer citizens who were now assured to participate in the hoplite war, due to a new tax (symmories, trierarchies). This change caused the break between sea control and democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信