比较健康个体和无症状腰痛患者的疲劳反应-对重返工作的影响:一项初步研究

Miriam C. Mattison, Natalie Ross
{"title":"比较健康个体和无症状腰痛患者的疲劳反应-对重返工作的影响:一项初步研究","authors":"Miriam C. Mattison, Natalie Ross","doi":"10.4314/ESA.V28I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although most LBP episodes are acute, research suggests that up to two-thirds of people suffer pain relapses within a year. As muscle fatigue is considered a risk factor for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorder, it was hypothesised that workers, who have seemingly recovered, i.e. are asymptomatic, display premature fatigue responses and may therefore be at elevated risk of re-injury. 30 volunteers were recruited: 10 without LBP history, 10 participants who experienced their last bout of symptoms between 9 and 12 months ago, and 10 participants who had been injured within the last 3 months. All groups were matched for basic demographic variables and individuals with LBP history were pain-free. Participants performed a self-paced repetitive lifting and lowering task until they reached a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the back of 17. Isometric back strength and joint position sense (deviation from 45o trunk flexion) were measured pre and post protocol. Task duration, back RPE, and sEMG of selected trunk and leg muscles were recorded throughout the protocol. Statistical significance was identified at p<0.05 using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey Post-hoc analyses. Although the groups with a LBP history displayed greater decrements in relative back strength, time to exertion and perceptions of effort, compared to the uninjured group, spectral analyses indicated that fewer LBP participants exhibited fatigue of the assessed muscles, and no differences were found for joint position sense compared to the uninjured participants. These results imply that previously injured participants displayed exaggerated subjective responses to the lifting task, which can be attributed to “fear avoidance behaviour”.Keywords: Fatigue, injury history, low back pain, re-injury, return-to-work","PeriodicalId":64555,"journal":{"name":"人类工效学","volume":"33 1","pages":"2-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing fatigue responses between healthy individuals and asymptomatic low back pain sufferers - implications for return-to-work : a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Miriam C. Mattison, Natalie Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ESA.V28I2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although most LBP episodes are acute, research suggests that up to two-thirds of people suffer pain relapses within a year. As muscle fatigue is considered a risk factor for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorder, it was hypothesised that workers, who have seemingly recovered, i.e. are asymptomatic, display premature fatigue responses and may therefore be at elevated risk of re-injury. 30 volunteers were recruited: 10 without LBP history, 10 participants who experienced their last bout of symptoms between 9 and 12 months ago, and 10 participants who had been injured within the last 3 months. All groups were matched for basic demographic variables and individuals with LBP history were pain-free. Participants performed a self-paced repetitive lifting and lowering task until they reached a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the back of 17. Isometric back strength and joint position sense (deviation from 45o trunk flexion) were measured pre and post protocol. Task duration, back RPE, and sEMG of selected trunk and leg muscles were recorded throughout the protocol. Statistical significance was identified at p<0.05 using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey Post-hoc analyses. Although the groups with a LBP history displayed greater decrements in relative back strength, time to exertion and perceptions of effort, compared to the uninjured group, spectral analyses indicated that fewer LBP participants exhibited fatigue of the assessed muscles, and no differences were found for joint position sense compared to the uninjured participants. These results imply that previously injured participants displayed exaggerated subjective responses to the lifting task, which can be attributed to “fear avoidance behaviour”.Keywords: Fatigue, injury history, low back pain, re-injury, return-to-work\",\"PeriodicalId\":64555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"人类工效学\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"2-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"人类工效学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ESA.V28I2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"人类工效学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ESA.V28I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然大多数腰痛发作是急性的,但研究表明,多达三分之二的人在一年内疼痛复发。由于肌肉疲劳被认为是与工作有关的肌肉骨骼疾病发展的一个危险因素,因此假设那些似乎已经康复的工人,即无症状的工人,表现出过早的疲劳反应,因此可能会增加再次受伤的风险。招募了30名志愿者:10名没有腰痛病史,10名在9至12个月前经历了最后一次症状发作,10名在最近3个月内受伤。所有组的基本人口学变量匹配,有腰痛史的个体无痛。参与者进行一项自定节奏的重复性举起和放下任务,直到他们达到17岁后的感知力量值(RPE)。在手术前后分别测量等长背强度和关节位置感(偏离躯干弯曲45度)。在整个过程中记录任务持续时间、背部RPE和选定躯干和腿部肌肉的肌电图。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后分析,p<0.05为统计学显著性。尽管与未受伤组相比,有腰痛史的组在相对背部力量、运动时间和努力感知方面表现出更大的下降,但光谱分析表明,较少的腰痛参与者表现出评估肌肉的疲劳,并且与未受伤的参与者相比,关节位置感没有差异。这些结果表明,先前受伤的参与者对举重任务表现出夸大的主观反应,这可归因于“恐惧回避行为”。关键词:疲劳,损伤史,腰痛,再损伤,重返工作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing fatigue responses between healthy individuals and asymptomatic low back pain sufferers - implications for return-to-work : a pilot study
Although most LBP episodes are acute, research suggests that up to two-thirds of people suffer pain relapses within a year. As muscle fatigue is considered a risk factor for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorder, it was hypothesised that workers, who have seemingly recovered, i.e. are asymptomatic, display premature fatigue responses and may therefore be at elevated risk of re-injury. 30 volunteers were recruited: 10 without LBP history, 10 participants who experienced their last bout of symptoms between 9 and 12 months ago, and 10 participants who had been injured within the last 3 months. All groups were matched for basic demographic variables and individuals with LBP history were pain-free. Participants performed a self-paced repetitive lifting and lowering task until they reached a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) for the back of 17. Isometric back strength and joint position sense (deviation from 45o trunk flexion) were measured pre and post protocol. Task duration, back RPE, and sEMG of selected trunk and leg muscles were recorded throughout the protocol. Statistical significance was identified at p<0.05 using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey Post-hoc analyses. Although the groups with a LBP history displayed greater decrements in relative back strength, time to exertion and perceptions of effort, compared to the uninjured group, spectral analyses indicated that fewer LBP participants exhibited fatigue of the assessed muscles, and no differences were found for joint position sense compared to the uninjured participants. These results imply that previously injured participants displayed exaggerated subjective responses to the lifting task, which can be attributed to “fear avoidance behaviour”.Keywords: Fatigue, injury history, low back pain, re-injury, return-to-work
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2444
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信