基于公开空间数据的雌性林地驯鹿利用或回避区域的土地覆盖边界划分

P. Saunders
{"title":"基于公开空间数据的雌性林地驯鹿利用或回避区域的土地覆盖边界划分","authors":"P. Saunders","doi":"10.2461/WBP.2013.9.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability and utility of spatial datasets, at no cost to the end user, directly impacts the ability of government and non-governmental wildlife management agencies to delineate landcover utilization or avoidance for targeted wildlife species. The availability and utility of four datasets; Canada Land Inventory for Ungulates, Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, Provincial Forest Inventory for the Island of Newfoundland, and the Landsat 7 ETM+ were evaluated for their usefulness in delineating landcover boundaries in areas utilized by caribou during calving and post-calving. To perform this evaluation a representative sample of landcover features, in both utilized and avoided areas, were selected through the use of space-time scan statistics and maximum step length calculations, then landcover boundaries were recorded using spiral transects based on the Fibonacci sequence. The location of all land cover boundaries intersected during the completion of ground based transects were recorded and provided a baseline dataset for comparison to those depicted using the selected datasets. Object-oriented segmentation had to be completed for the Landsat ETM+ dataset before a comparison could be conducted. Root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated for all datasets and compared with the ground based results. In addition, RMSE values were also calculated for a set of randomly generated boundary locations for each completed transect. For all datasets errors of omission were taken into account on an independent basis. Upon completion of the evaluation it was determined that all datasets, except the Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, where both the RMSE for random (r) and actual (a) boundary points (r=22.89, a=14.93, error 25meters (m)) was below the associated positional error of the dataset, would be useful for the delineation of landcover boundaries. The Canada Land Inventory (r=86.60, a=30.43, error 35m) was deemed useful only for its ability to provide information on historical location and permanence of boundaries at the landscape scale. To provide landcover delineation for the island of Newfoundland a combination of both the forest inventory (r=64.71, a=39.47, error 35m) and landsat datasets (r=37.02, a=27.92, error 30m) must be utilized along with a variety of ancillary data sources.","PeriodicalId":89522,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","volume":"313 1","pages":"40-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delineation of Landcover Boundaries in Areas Utilized or Avoided by Female Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) Using Publicly Available Spatial Datasets.\",\"authors\":\"P. Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.2461/WBP.2013.9.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The availability and utility of spatial datasets, at no cost to the end user, directly impacts the ability of government and non-governmental wildlife management agencies to delineate landcover utilization or avoidance for targeted wildlife species. The availability and utility of four datasets; Canada Land Inventory for Ungulates, Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, Provincial Forest Inventory for the Island of Newfoundland, and the Landsat 7 ETM+ were evaluated for their usefulness in delineating landcover boundaries in areas utilized by caribou during calving and post-calving. To perform this evaluation a representative sample of landcover features, in both utilized and avoided areas, were selected through the use of space-time scan statistics and maximum step length calculations, then landcover boundaries were recorded using spiral transects based on the Fibonacci sequence. The location of all land cover boundaries intersected during the completion of ground based transects were recorded and provided a baseline dataset for comparison to those depicted using the selected datasets. Object-oriented segmentation had to be completed for the Landsat ETM+ dataset before a comparison could be conducted. Root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated for all datasets and compared with the ground based results. In addition, RMSE values were also calculated for a set of randomly generated boundary locations for each completed transect. For all datasets errors of omission were taken into account on an independent basis. Upon completion of the evaluation it was determined that all datasets, except the Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, where both the RMSE for random (r) and actual (a) boundary points (r=22.89, a=14.93, error 25meters (m)) was below the associated positional error of the dataset, would be useful for the delineation of landcover boundaries. The Canada Land Inventory (r=86.60, a=30.43, error 35m) was deemed useful only for its ability to provide information on historical location and permanence of boundaries at the landscape scale. To provide landcover delineation for the island of Newfoundland a combination of both the forest inventory (r=64.71, a=39.47, error 35m) and landsat datasets (r=37.02, a=27.92, error 30m) must be utilized along with a variety of ancillary data sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"volume\":\"313 1\",\"pages\":\"40-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.9.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife biology in practice (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2461/WBP.2013.9.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空间数据集的可用性和实用性,直接影响政府和非政府野生动物管理机构划定目标野生动物物种的土地覆盖利用或避免的能力。四种数据集的可用性和实用性;评估了加拿大有蹄类土地清查、森林可持续发展地球观测、纽芬兰岛省级森林清查和Landsat 7 ETM+在划分北美驯鹿产犊和产犊后利用区域土地覆盖边界方面的有效性。通过时空扫描统计和最大步长计算,在利用和避免的区域中选择具有代表性的土地覆盖特征样本,然后使用基于斐波那契序列的螺旋样带记录土地覆盖边界。记录了完成地基样条期间相交的所有土地覆盖边界的位置,并提供了基线数据集,以便与使用选定数据集描绘的数据集进行比较。在进行比较之前,必须完成Landsat ETM+数据集的面向对象分割。计算所有数据集的均方根误差(RMSE)值,并与地面结果进行比较。此外,还计算了每个完成样条随机生成的一组边界位置的RMSE值。对于所有的数据集,遗漏的错误都是在独立的基础上考虑的。评估完成后,确定除了森林可持续发展地球观测之外的所有数据集,其中随机(r)和实际(a)边界点的RMSE (r=22.89, a=14.93,误差25米(m))都低于数据集的相关位置误差,这些数据集将有助于划定土地覆盖边界。加拿大土地清单(r=86.60, a=30.43,误差35m)仅因其能够在景观尺度上提供有关历史位置和边界持久性的信息而被认为有用。为了提供纽芬兰岛的土地覆盖圈定,必须结合森林清盘(r=64.71, a=39.47,误差35m)和陆地卫星数据集(r=37.02, a=27.92,误差30m)以及各种辅助数据源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delineation of Landcover Boundaries in Areas Utilized or Avoided by Female Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) Using Publicly Available Spatial Datasets.
The availability and utility of spatial datasets, at no cost to the end user, directly impacts the ability of government and non-governmental wildlife management agencies to delineate landcover utilization or avoidance for targeted wildlife species. The availability and utility of four datasets; Canada Land Inventory for Ungulates, Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, Provincial Forest Inventory for the Island of Newfoundland, and the Landsat 7 ETM+ were evaluated for their usefulness in delineating landcover boundaries in areas utilized by caribou during calving and post-calving. To perform this evaluation a representative sample of landcover features, in both utilized and avoided areas, were selected through the use of space-time scan statistics and maximum step length calculations, then landcover boundaries were recorded using spiral transects based on the Fibonacci sequence. The location of all land cover boundaries intersected during the completion of ground based transects were recorded and provided a baseline dataset for comparison to those depicted using the selected datasets. Object-oriented segmentation had to be completed for the Landsat ETM+ dataset before a comparison could be conducted. Root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated for all datasets and compared with the ground based results. In addition, RMSE values were also calculated for a set of randomly generated boundary locations for each completed transect. For all datasets errors of omission were taken into account on an independent basis. Upon completion of the evaluation it was determined that all datasets, except the Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests, where both the RMSE for random (r) and actual (a) boundary points (r=22.89, a=14.93, error 25meters (m)) was below the associated positional error of the dataset, would be useful for the delineation of landcover boundaries. The Canada Land Inventory (r=86.60, a=30.43, error 35m) was deemed useful only for its ability to provide information on historical location and permanence of boundaries at the landscape scale. To provide landcover delineation for the island of Newfoundland a combination of both the forest inventory (r=64.71, a=39.47, error 35m) and landsat datasets (r=37.02, a=27.92, error 30m) must be utilized along with a variety of ancillary data sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信