[前瞻性观察研究探讨血糖水平和变异性与危重患者预后的关系]。

Xu Liu, Di-fen Wang, Jie Xiong
{"title":"[前瞻性观察研究探讨血糖水平和变异性与危重患者预后的关系]。","authors":"Xu Liu, Di-fen Wang, Jie Xiong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo explore the relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of critical patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospective study was conducted. Blood glucose monitoring and prognosis observation were performed for the adult nondiabetic patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) from June 2011 to January 2012. Blood glucose monitoring terminal was 72 hours after admitting in ICU, prognosis was observed for 28 days after the end of turning into ICU. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHE II) scores when transferred into ICU and blood glucose variability [standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose, mean absolute blood glucose fluctuation amplitude (MAGE) and glycemic instability index (GLI)] were calculated. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to the outcome, and the APACHE II score, mean blood glucose and blood glucose variability were compared between the two groups. Patients were divided into different groups based on the blood glucose, and the APACHE II score, blood glucose variability and 28-day mortality were compared among groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTotal 85 cases were enrolled. Compared with survivor group (n=58), in death group (n=27), APACHE II score (28.9±6.6 vs. 23.8±5.9), mean blood glucose (11.9±2.9 mmol/L vs. 9.4±1.8 mmol/L), SD of blood glucose (3.7±1.6 mmol/L vs. 2.4±1.0 mmol/L), MAGE (0.86±0.46 mmol/L vs. 0.54±0.25 mmol/L) and GLI (255.9±232.7 vs. 111.7±110.9) were increased (all P<0.05). SD of blood glucose (4.3±1.4 mmol/L), MAGE (1.1±0.4 mmol/L), GLI (345.3±210.3) and 28-day mortality (63.6%) in blood glucose >11.1 mmol/L group (n=22) were higher than those in ≤11.1 mmol/L group (n=63, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 91.9±91.2, 20.6%, respectively, all P<0.05) and 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group (n=52, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 85.2±66.4, 25.0%, respectively, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group and <7.8 mmol/L group (n=11) in SD of blood glucose (2.0±0.9 mmol/L), MAGE (0.5±0.3 mmol/L), GLI (123.8±166.7) and 28-day mortality (0, all P>0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBlood glucose variability is associated with critical patient's 28-day mortality, and may predict mortality as good as APACHE II score.","PeriodicalId":23992,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","volume":"217 1","pages":"538-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prospective observational study exploring the relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of critical patients].\",\"authors\":\"Xu Liu, Di-fen Wang, Jie Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo explore the relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of critical patients.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA prospective study was conducted. Blood glucose monitoring and prognosis observation were performed for the adult nondiabetic patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) from June 2011 to January 2012. Blood glucose monitoring terminal was 72 hours after admitting in ICU, prognosis was observed for 28 days after the end of turning into ICU. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHE II) scores when transferred into ICU and blood glucose variability [standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose, mean absolute blood glucose fluctuation amplitude (MAGE) and glycemic instability index (GLI)] were calculated. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to the outcome, and the APACHE II score, mean blood glucose and blood glucose variability were compared between the two groups. Patients were divided into different groups based on the blood glucose, and the APACHE II score, blood glucose variability and 28-day mortality were compared among groups.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTotal 85 cases were enrolled. Compared with survivor group (n=58), in death group (n=27), APACHE II score (28.9±6.6 vs. 23.8±5.9), mean blood glucose (11.9±2.9 mmol/L vs. 9.4±1.8 mmol/L), SD of blood glucose (3.7±1.6 mmol/L vs. 2.4±1.0 mmol/L), MAGE (0.86±0.46 mmol/L vs. 0.54±0.25 mmol/L) and GLI (255.9±232.7 vs. 111.7±110.9) were increased (all P<0.05). SD of blood glucose (4.3±1.4 mmol/L), MAGE (1.1±0.4 mmol/L), GLI (345.3±210.3) and 28-day mortality (63.6%) in blood glucose >11.1 mmol/L group (n=22) were higher than those in ≤11.1 mmol/L group (n=63, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 91.9±91.2, 20.6%, respectively, all P<0.05) and 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group (n=52, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 85.2±66.4, 25.0%, respectively, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group and <7.8 mmol/L group (n=11) in SD of blood glucose (2.0±0.9 mmol/L), MAGE (0.5±0.3 mmol/L), GLI (123.8±166.7) and 28-day mortality (0, all P>0.05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nBlood glucose variability is associated with critical patient's 28-day mortality, and may predict mortality as good as APACHE II score.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue\",\"volume\":\"217 1\",\"pages\":\"538-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.09.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的探讨危重患者血糖水平及变异性与预后的关系。方法采用前瞻性研究。对2011年6月至2012年1月入住重症监护病房(ICU)的成人非糖尿病患者进行血糖监测及预后观察。血糖监测终端为入ICU后72 h,转ICU结束后28 d观察预后。计算转入ICU时的急性生理和慢性健康评估II(APACHE II)评分和血糖变异性[血糖标准差(SD)、平均绝对血糖波动幅度(MAGE)和血糖不稳定指数(GLI)]。根据预后将患者分为死亡组和生存组,比较两组患者APACHE II评分、平均血糖和血糖变异性。根据血糖水平将患者分为不同的组,比较各组间APACHE II评分、血糖变异性和28天死亡率。结果共入组85例。与生存组(n=58)、死亡组(n=27)比较,APACHEⅱ评分(28.9±6.6 vs. 23.8±5.9)、平均血糖(11.9±2.9 mmol/L vs. 9.4±1.8 mmol/L)、血糖SD(3.7±1.6 mmol/L vs. 2.4±1.0 mmol/L)、MAGE(0.86±0.46 mmol/L vs. 0.54±0.25 mmol/L)、GLI(255.9±232.7 vs. 111.7±110.9)均升高(P11.1 mmol/L组(n=22)均高于≤11.1 mmol/L组(n=63、2.3±0.9 mmol/L、0.5±0.2 mmol/L、91.9±91.2、20.6%,均P0.05)。结论血糖变异性与危重患者28天死亡率相关,并可与APACHE II评分一样预测死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Prospective observational study exploring the relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of critical patients].
OBJECTIVE To explore the relationship between the levels and variability of blood glucose and the prognosis of critical patients. METHODS A prospective study was conducted. Blood glucose monitoring and prognosis observation were performed for the adult nondiabetic patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) from June 2011 to January 2012. Blood glucose monitoring terminal was 72 hours after admitting in ICU, prognosis was observed for 28 days after the end of turning into ICU. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHE II) scores when transferred into ICU and blood glucose variability [standard deviation (SD) of blood glucose, mean absolute blood glucose fluctuation amplitude (MAGE) and glycemic instability index (GLI)] were calculated. Patients were divided into death group and survival group according to the outcome, and the APACHE II score, mean blood glucose and blood glucose variability were compared between the two groups. Patients were divided into different groups based on the blood glucose, and the APACHE II score, blood glucose variability and 28-day mortality were compared among groups. RESULTS Total 85 cases were enrolled. Compared with survivor group (n=58), in death group (n=27), APACHE II score (28.9±6.6 vs. 23.8±5.9), mean blood glucose (11.9±2.9 mmol/L vs. 9.4±1.8 mmol/L), SD of blood glucose (3.7±1.6 mmol/L vs. 2.4±1.0 mmol/L), MAGE (0.86±0.46 mmol/L vs. 0.54±0.25 mmol/L) and GLI (255.9±232.7 vs. 111.7±110.9) were increased (all P<0.05). SD of blood glucose (4.3±1.4 mmol/L), MAGE (1.1±0.4 mmol/L), GLI (345.3±210.3) and 28-day mortality (63.6%) in blood glucose >11.1 mmol/L group (n=22) were higher than those in ≤11.1 mmol/L group (n=63, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 91.9±91.2, 20.6%, respectively, all P<0.05) and 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group (n=52, 2.3±0.9 mmol/L, 0.5±0.2 mmol/L, 85.2±66.4, 25.0%, respectively, all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between 7.8-11.1 mmol/L group and <7.8 mmol/L group (n=11) in SD of blood glucose (2.0±0.9 mmol/L), MAGE (0.5±0.3 mmol/L), GLI (123.8±166.7) and 28-day mortality (0, all P>0.05). CONCLUSION Blood glucose variability is associated with critical patient's 28-day mortality, and may predict mortality as good as APACHE II score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信