权利稀释:产权制度发展的一个阶段

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
I. Komarova, E. Ustyuzhanina, Kava Khodzha
{"title":"权利稀释:产权制度发展的一个阶段","authors":"I. Komarova, E. Ustyuzhanina, Kava Khodzha","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.078-088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work is devoted to the consideration of two trends in the development of property relations – the trend towards greater specification of individual rights, which is characteristic of the market economy model, and the trend of dilution of rights and incompleteness of obligations that is typical for the network model of relations. For a long time, the prevailing point of view in economic research was that a high certainty of property rights is a necessary condition for the effective development of the economy. The article presents the main arguments of the supporters of this position. At the same time, within the framework of the new institutional theory, the two trends casting doubt on this postulate emerged – the theory of property regimes and the economic theory of contracts. The article justifies that under certain conditions strict certainty of property rights may create some barriers to improving the efficiency of economic interaction. Such ways of organizing economic interaction as cooperation and partnership can be based on a system of implicit expectations, which are a classic example of a fuzzy specification of rights and obligations. The authors note that the dilution of rights is characteristic not only for a stationary state – the determination of rules for accessing resources, the order of its use, and the order of changing both of them. The dynamic perspective of the property problem is no less important – the dilution of obligatory rights associated with contractual relations. In real practice incomplete contracts characterized by a fuzzy specification of mutual rights and obligations are common. Thus, in the modern economy, a fuzzy specification of rights is characteristic of both the static (property rights) and dynamic (obligatory rights) aspects of the distribution of rights and obligations.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"337 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dilution of Rights as a Stage in the Development of the Institution of Property\",\"authors\":\"I. Komarova, E. Ustyuzhanina, Kava Khodzha\",\"doi\":\"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.078-088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work is devoted to the consideration of two trends in the development of property relations – the trend towards greater specification of individual rights, which is characteristic of the market economy model, and the trend of dilution of rights and incompleteness of obligations that is typical for the network model of relations. For a long time, the prevailing point of view in economic research was that a high certainty of property rights is a necessary condition for the effective development of the economy. The article presents the main arguments of the supporters of this position. At the same time, within the framework of the new institutional theory, the two trends casting doubt on this postulate emerged – the theory of property regimes and the economic theory of contracts. The article justifies that under certain conditions strict certainty of property rights may create some barriers to improving the efficiency of economic interaction. Such ways of organizing economic interaction as cooperation and partnership can be based on a system of implicit expectations, which are a classic example of a fuzzy specification of rights and obligations. The authors note that the dilution of rights is characteristic not only for a stationary state – the determination of rules for accessing resources, the order of its use, and the order of changing both of them. The dynamic perspective of the property problem is no less important – the dilution of obligatory rights associated with contractual relations. In real practice incomplete contracts characterized by a fuzzy specification of mutual rights and obligations are common. Thus, in the modern economy, a fuzzy specification of rights is characteristic of both the static (property rights) and dynamic (obligatory rights) aspects of the distribution of rights and obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"volume\":\"337 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.078-088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.1.078-088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作致力于考虑财产关系发展的两种趋势——市场经济模式所特有的个人权利更具体的趋势,以及网络关系模式所特有的权利稀释和义务不完整的趋势。长期以来,经济学研究的主流观点是,产权的高度确定性是经济有效发展的必要条件。这篇文章提出了这一立场的支持者的主要论点。与此同时,在新制度理论的框架内,出现了对这一假设提出质疑的两种趋势——财产制度理论和契约经济理论。在一定条件下,严格的产权确定性可能会对提高经济互动效率造成一定的障碍。诸如合作和伙伴关系等组织经济互动的方式可以建立在一种隐性期望系统的基础上,这是模糊规定权利和义务的典型例子。这组作者指出,权利的稀释不仅是固定状态的特征——确定获取资源的规则、使用资源的顺序以及改变这两者的顺序。财产问题的动态视角同样重要——与契约关系相关的债权的稀释。在现实实践中,以相互权利和义务的模糊规定为特征的不完全合同是常见的。因此,在现代经济中,权利的模糊规定是权利和义务分配的静态(财产权)和动态(债权)方面的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Dilution of Rights as a Stage in the Development of the Institution of Property
The work is devoted to the consideration of two trends in the development of property relations – the trend towards greater specification of individual rights, which is characteristic of the market economy model, and the trend of dilution of rights and incompleteness of obligations that is typical for the network model of relations. For a long time, the prevailing point of view in economic research was that a high certainty of property rights is a necessary condition for the effective development of the economy. The article presents the main arguments of the supporters of this position. At the same time, within the framework of the new institutional theory, the two trends casting doubt on this postulate emerged – the theory of property regimes and the economic theory of contracts. The article justifies that under certain conditions strict certainty of property rights may create some barriers to improving the efficiency of economic interaction. Such ways of organizing economic interaction as cooperation and partnership can be based on a system of implicit expectations, which are a classic example of a fuzzy specification of rights and obligations. The authors note that the dilution of rights is characteristic not only for a stationary state – the determination of rules for accessing resources, the order of its use, and the order of changing both of them. The dynamic perspective of the property problem is no less important – the dilution of obligatory rights associated with contractual relations. In real practice incomplete contracts characterized by a fuzzy specification of mutual rights and obligations are common. Thus, in the modern economy, a fuzzy specification of rights is characteristic of both the static (property rights) and dynamic (obligatory rights) aspects of the distribution of rights and obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信